Evolution towards self-compatibility when mates are limited

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1967-1973

  Willi, Y ^a,b  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Inbreeding depression; Inbreeding load; Leaky self incompatibility; Mate limitation; Mating system; Polyploidy; Ranunculaceae; Reproductive assurance; S locus

Indexed keywords

AUTOGAMY; DICOTYLEDON; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FITNESS; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; POLYPLOIDY; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SELF INCOMPATIBILITY;

ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; INBREEDING; RANUNCULACEAE;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; INBREEDING; RANUNCULUS;

RANUNCULACEAE; RANUNCULUS REPTANS;

EID: 69249177165     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01806.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Armbruster, P. Reed, D.H. 2005. Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95 : 235 242.
2. Barrett, S.C.H. Harder, L.D. 2006. David G. Lloyd and the evolution of floral biology: from natural history to strategic analysis. In : Ecology and Evolution of Flowers (L.D. Harder S.C.H. Barrett, eds pp. 1 22. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
3. Bever, J.D. Felber, F. 1992. The theoretical population genetics of autopolyploidy. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 8 : 185 217.
4. Busch, J.W. Schoen, D.J. 2008. The evolution of self-incompatibility when mates are limiting. Trends Plant Sci. 13 : 128 136.
5. Butruille, D.V. Boiteux, L.S. 2000. Selection-mutation balance in polysomic tetraploids: impact of double reduction and gametophytic selection on the frequency and subchromosomal localization of deleterious mutations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97 : 6608 6613.
6. Byers, D.L. Waller, D.M. 1999. Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30 : 479 513.
7. Charlesworth, D. Charlesworth, B. 1979. The evolution and breakdown of S-allele systems. Heredity 43 : 41 55.
8. Fischer, M., Hock, M. Paschke, M. 2003. Low genetic variation reduces cross-compatibility and offspring fitness in populations of a narrow endemic plant with a self-incompatibility system. Cons. Genet. 4 : 325 336.
9. Glémin, S., Gaude, T., Guillemin, M.L., Lourmas, M., Olivieri, I. Mignot, A. 2005. Balancing selection in the wild: testing population genetics theory of self-incompatibility in the rare species Brassica insularis. Genetics 171 : 279 289.
10. Golmirzaie, A.M., Ortiz, R., Atlin, G.N. Iwanaga, M. 1998. Inbreeding and true seed in tetrasomic potato. I. Selfing and open pollination in Andean landraces (Solanum tuberosum Gp. Andigena). Theor. Appl. Genet. 97 : 1125 1128. (Pubitemid 29014638)
11. Goodwillie, C. 2008. Transient SI and the dynamics of self-incompatibility alleles: a simulation model and empirical test. Evolution 62 : 2105 2111.
12. Goodwillie, C., Partis, K.L. West, J.W. 2004. Transient self-incompatibility confers delayed selfing in Leptosiphon jepsonii (Polemoniaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 165 : 387 394.
13. Goodwillie, C., Kalisz, S. Eckert, C.G. 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36 : 47 79.
14. Hadfield, J.D. 2009. MCMCglmm: Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for generalised linear mixed models. URL http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ MCMCglmm/vignettes/Tutorial.pdf.
15. Hedrick, P.W. 2001. Conservation genetics: where are we now? Trends Ecol. Evol. 16 : 629 636.
16. Holderegger, R., Häner, R., Csencsics, D., Angelone, S. Hoebee, S.E. 2008. S-allele diversity suggests no mate limitation in small populations of a self-incompatible plant. Evolution 62 : 2922 2928.
17. Husband, B.C. Schemske, D.W. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50 : 54 70.
18. Igic, B. Kohn, J.R. 2006. The distribution of plant mating systems: study bias against obligately outcrossing species. Evolution 60 : 1098 1103.
19. Kolb, A. 2005. Reduced reproductive success and offspring survival in fragmented populations of the forest herb Phyteuma spicatum. J. Ecol. 93 : 1226 1237.
20. Lande, R. Schemske, D.W. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39 : 24 40. (Pubitemid 16276773)
21. Levin, D.A. 1996. The evolutionary significance of pseudo-self-fertility. Am. Nat. 148 : 321 332.
22. Lloyd, D.G. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. Am. Nat. 113 : 67 79.
23. Lundqvist, A. 1990. The complex S-gene system for control of self-incompatibility in the buttercup genus Ranunculus. Hereditas 113 : 29 46.
24. Lundqvist, A. 1994. The self-incompatibility system in Ranunculus repens (Ranunculaceae). Hereditas 120 : 151 157.
25. Lundqvist, A. 1998. Disomic control of self-incompatibility in the tetraploid Ranunculus repens (Ranunculaceae). Hereditas 128 : 181 183.
26. Mable, B.K. 2008. Genetic causes and consequences of the breakdown of self-incompatibility: case studies in the Brassicaceae. Genet. Res. 90 : 47 60.
27. Maynard Smith, J. 1978. The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
28. de Nettancourt, D. 2001. Incompatibility and Incongruity in Wild and Cultivated Plants, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin.
29. Pickup, M. Young, A.G. 2008. Population size, self-incompatibility and genetic resuce in diploid and tetraploid races of Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides (Asteraceae). Heredity 100 : 268 274.
30. Porcher, E. Lande, R. 2005. Loss of gametophytic self-incompatibility with evolution of inbreeding depression. Evolution 59 : 46 60.
31. Prati, D. Peintinger, M. 2000. Biological flora of Central Europe: Ranunculus reptans L. Flora 195 : 135 145.
32. SAS Institute 2006. The GLIMMIX Procedure. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
33. Takayama, S. Isogai, A. 2005. Self-incompatibility in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 56 : 467 489.
34. Vallejo-Marín, M. Uyenoyama, M.K. 2004. On the evolutionary costs of self-incompatibility: incomplete reproductive compensation due to pollen limitation. Evolution 58 : 1924 1935.
35. Vekemans, X., Schierup, M.H. Christiansen, F.B. 1998. Mate availability and fecundity selection in multi-allelic self-incompatibility systems in plants. Evolution 52 : 19 29.
36. Vogler, D.W. Stephenson, A.G. 2001. The potential for mixed mating in a self-incompatible plant. Int. J. Plant Sci. 162 : 801 805.
37. Vogler, D.W., Filmore, K. Stephenson, A.G. 1999. Inbreeding depression in Campanula rapunculoides L. I. A comparison of inbreeding depression in plants derived from strong and weak self-incompatibility phenotypes. J. Evol. Biol. 12 : 483 494.
38. Willi, Y. Fischer, M. 2005. Genetic rescue in interconnected populations of small and large size of the self-incompatible Ranunculus reptans. Heredity 95 : 437 443.
39. Willi, Y., Van Buskirk, J. Fischer, M. 2005. A threefold genetic Allee effect: population size affects cross-compatibility, inbreeding depression, and drift load in the self-incompatible Ranunculus reptans. Genetics 169 : 2255 2265.
40. Willi, Y., Van Buskirk, J. Hoffmann, A.A. 2006. Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37 : 433 458.
41. Willi, Y., Dietrich, S., van Kleunen, M. Fischer, M. 2007a. Inter-specific competitive stress does not affect the magnitude of inbreeding depression. Evol. Ecol. Res. 9 : 959 974.
42. Willi, Y., Van Buskirk, J., Schmid, B. Fischer, M. 2007b. Genetic isolation of fragmented populations is exacerbated by drift and selection. J. Evol. Biol. 20 : 534 542.
43. Wright, S. 1939. The distribution of self-sterility alleles in populations. Genetics 24 : 538 552.