The effects of a bottleneck on inbreeding depression and the genetic load

American Naturalist

Volumn 155, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 154-167

  Kirkpatrick, Mark ^a,b   Jarne, Philippe ^a,c  

^a INSTITUT DES SCIENCES DE L EVOLUTION   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^c CENTRE D ECOLOGIE FONCTIONNELLE ET EVOLUTIVE   (France)

Author keywords

Bottlenecks; Deleterious mutations; Genetic load; Inbreeding depression; Self fertilization

Indexed keywords

INBREEDING DEPRESSION; MUTATION; POPULATION BOTTLENECK; POPULATION GENETICS;

EID: 0034127251     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/303312     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Barrett, S. C. H. 1998. The reproductive biology and genetics of island species. Pages 18-34 in P. R. Grant, ed. Evolution on islands. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
2. Bataillon, T., and M. Kirkpatrick. In press. Inbreeding depression due to mildly deleterious mutations in finite populations: size does matter. Genetical Research.
3. Charlesworth, B., and D. Charlesworth. 1998. Some evolutionary consequences of deleterious mutations. Genetica 102/103:3-19.
4. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:237-268.
5. Charlesworth, D., M. T. Morgan, and R. Charlesworth. 1992. The effect of linkage and population size on inbreeding depression due to mutational load. Genetical Research 59:49-61.
6. Cornuet, J.-M., and G. Luikart. 1996. Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001-2014.
7. Crow, J. F. 1970. Genetic loads and the cost of natural selection. Pages 128-177 in K. Kojima, eds. Mathematical topics in population biology. Springer, Berlin.
8. -. 1993. Mutation, mean fitness, and genetic load. Oxford Surveys of Evolutionary Biology 9:3-42.
9. Dudash, M. R., and D. E. Carr. 1998. Genetics underlying inbreeding depression in Mimulus with contrasting mating systems. Nature (London) 393:682-684.
10. Falk, D. A., and K. E. Holsinger, eds. 1991. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
11. Fiedler, P. L., and S. K. Jain, eds. 1992. Conservation biology: the theory and practice of nature conservation, preservation and management. Chapman & Hall, New York.
12. Fisher, R. A. 1941. Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Annals of Eugenics 11:53-63.
13. Frankham, R. 1995. Conservation genetics. Annual Review of Genetics 29:305-327.
14. Haldane, J. B. S. 1927. The mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection. V. Selection and mutation. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 23: 838-844.
15. -. 1937. The effect of variation on fitness. American Naturalist 71:337-349.
16. Hedrick, P. W. 1994. Purging inbreeding depression and the probability of extinction: full-sib mating. Heredity 73:363-372.
17. Jarne, P. 1995. Mating system, bottlenecks and genetic polymorphism in hermaphroditic animals. Genetical Research 65:193-207.
18. Jarne, P., and D. Charlesworth. 1993. The evolution of the selfing rate in functionally hermaphrodite plants and animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 441-466.
19. Keller, L. F., P. Arcese, J. N. M. Smith, W. M. Hochachka, and S. C. Stearns. 1994. Selection against inbred song sparrows during a natural population bottleneck. Science (Washington, D.C.) 372:356-357.
20. Kimura, M, T. Maruyama, and J. F. Crow. 1963. The mutation load in small populations. Genetics 48: 1303-1312.
21. Lande, R. 1994. Risk of population extinction from fixation of new deleterious mutations. Evolution 48:1460-1469.
22. Lande, R., and D. W. Schemske. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39:24-40.
23. Lande, R., D. W. Schemske, and S. T. Schultz. 1994. High inbreeding depression, selective interference among loci, and the threshold selfing rate for purging recessive lethal mutations. Evolution 48:965-978.
24. Lloyd, D. G. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. American Naturalist 113:67-79.
25. Lynch, M., J. Conery, and R. Bürger. 1995. Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. American Naturalist 146:489-518.
26. Maruyama, T., and P. A. Fuerst. 1985. Population bottlenecks and nonequilibrium models in population genetics. II. Number of alleles in a small population that was formed by a recent bottleneck. Genetics III: 675-689.
27. Nei, M., T. Maruyama, and R. Chakraborty. 1975. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29:1-10.
28. Ralls, K., and J. Ballou. 1986. Captive breeding programs for populations with a small number of individuals. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 1:19-22.
29. Ronfort, J., and D. Couvet. 1995. A stochastic model of selection on selfing rates in structured populations. Genetical Research 65:209-222.
30. Saccheri, I., M. Kuussaari, M. Kankare, P. Vikman, W. Fortelius, and I. Hanski. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature (London) 392:491-494.
31. Uyenoyama, M. K., and D. M. Waller. 1991. Coevolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression. I. Genetic modification in response to mutation-selection balance at one and two loci. Theoretical Population Biology 40: 14-16.
32. Uyenoyama, M. K., K. E. Holsinger, and D. M. Waller. 1993. Ecological and genetic factors directing the evolution of self-fertilization. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 9:327-381.
33. Wang, J., A. Caballero, P. D. Keightley, and W. G. Hill. 1998. Bottleneck effect on genetic variance: a theoretical investigation of the role of dominance. Genetics 150: 435-447.