Status, Threat, and Stereotypes: Understanding the Function of Rape Myth Acceptance

Social Justice Research

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 18-41

  Chapleau, Kristine M ^a,b   Oswald, Debra L ^a  

^a MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Liberal reactive hypothesis; Rape myth acceptance; Sexual violence; Stereotypes; System justification theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874657966     PISSN: 08857466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11211-013-0177-z     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111-125. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 84. 1. 111.
2. Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other 'authoritarian personality'. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47-91. doi: 10. 1016/S0065-2601(08)60382-2.
3. Ashburn-Nardo, L., Knowles, M. L., & Monteith, M. J. (2003). Black Americans' implicit racial associations and their implications for intergroup judgment. Social Cognition, 21, 61-87. doi: 10. 1521/soco. 21. 1. 61. 21192.
4. Benedict, H. (1992). Virgin or vamp: How the press covers sex crimes. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Bohner, L., & Lampridis, E. (2004). Expecting to meet a rape victim affects women's self-esteem: The moderating role of rape myth acceptance. Group Process and Intergroup Relations, 7, 77-88. doi: 10. 1177/1368430204039974.
6. Bohner, G., Reinhard, M., Rutz, S., Sturm, S., Kerschbaum, B., & Effler, D. (1998). Rape myths as neutralizing cognitions: Evidence for a causal impact of anti-victim attitudes on men's self-reported likelihood of raping. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 257-268. doi: 10. 1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199803/04)28: 2<257: AID-EJSP871> 3. 0. CO; 2-1.
7. Bohner, G., Siebler, F., & Schmelcher, J. (2006). Social norms and the likelihood of raping: Perceived rape myth acceptance of others affects men's rape proclivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 286-297. doi: 10. 1177/0146167205280912.
8. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 38. 2. 217.
9. Caricati, L. (2007). The relationship between social dominance orientation and gender: The mediating role of social values. Sex Roles, 57, 159-171. doi: 10. 1007/s11199-007-9231-3.
10. Chapleau, K. M., & Oswald, D. L. (2010). Power, sex, and rape myth acceptance: Testing two models of rape proclivity. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 66-78. doi: 10. 1080/00224490902954323.
11. Chapleau, K. M., Oswald, D. L., & Russell, B. L. (2007). How ambivalent sexism toward women and men support rape myth acceptance. Sex Roles, 57, 131-136. doi: 10. 1007/s11199-007-9196-2.
12. Conway, M., Pizzamiglio, M. T., & Mount, L. (1996). Status, communality, and agency: Implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 71, 25-38.
13. Currier, D., & Carlson, J. (2009). Creating attitudinal change through teaching: How a course on "women and violence" changes students' attitudes about violence against women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 1735-1754. doi: 10. 1177/0886260509335239.
14. Du Mont, J., Miller, K. L., & Myhr, T. L. (2003). The role of "real rape" and "real victim" stereotypes in the police reporting practices of sexually assaulted women. Violence Against Women, 9, 466-486.
15. Eagly, A. H., Diekman, A. B., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Koenig, A. M. (2004). Gender gaps in sociopolitical attitudes: A social psychological analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 796-816. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 87. 6. 796.
16. Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 543-558.
17. Eagly, A., & Steffen, V. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 46, 735-754.
18. Eyssel, F., & Bohner, G. (2011). Schema effects of rape myth acceptance on judgments of guilt and blame in rape cases: The role of perceived entitlement to judge. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 1579-1605. doi: 10. 1177/0886260510370593.
19. Garcia-Marques, L., Santos, A. S. C., & Mackie, D. M. (2006). Stereotypes: Static abstractions or dynamic knowledge structures? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 814-831. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 91. 5. 814.
20. George, W. H., & Martinez, L. J. (2002). Victim blaming in rape: Effects of victim and perpetrator race, type of rape, and participant racism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 110-119. doi: 10. 1111/1471-6402. 00049.
21. Gerger, H., Kley, H., Bohner, G., & Siebler, F. (2007). The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression scale: Development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 422-440. doi: 10. 1002/ab. 20195.
22. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 70. 3. 491.
23. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Ambivalent stereotypes as legitimizing ideologies: Differentiating paternalistic and envious prejudice. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 278-306). New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Green, E. G. T., Thomsen, L., Sidanius, J., Staerklé, C., & Potanina, P. (2009). Reactions to crime as a hierarchy regulating strategy: The moderating role of social dominance orientation. Social Justice Research, 22, 416-436. doi: 10/1007/s11211-009-0106-3.
25. Groth, A. N., & Burgess, A. W. (1978). Rape: A pseudosexual act. International Journal of Women's Studies, 1, 207-210. doi: 10. 1016/S0148-0685(78)90935-1.
26. Jackman, M. R. (2001). License to kill: Violence and legitimacy in expropriative social relations. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 437-467). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Jones, C., & Aronson, E. (1973). Attribution of fault to a rape victim as a function of respectability of the victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 415-419. doi: 10. 1037/h0034463.
28. Jost, J. T. (1997). An experimental replication of the depressed-entitlement effect among women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 387-393. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1471-6402. 1997. tb00120. x.
29. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27. doi: 10. 1111/j. 2044-8309. 1994. tb01008. x.
30. Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111-153. doi: 10. 1080/10463280240000046.
31. Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498-509.
32. Jost, J. T., Kivetz, Y., Rubini, M., Guermandi, G., & Mosso, C. (2005). System-justifying functions of complementary regional and ethnic stereotype: Cross-national evidence. Social Justice Research, 18, 305-333. doi: 10. 1007/s11211-005-6827-z.
33. Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., & Carvallo, M. R. (2002). Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 586-602.
34. Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., & Ni Sullivan, B. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13-36. doi: 10. 1002/ejsp. 127.
35. Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209-232. doi: 10. 1006/jesp. 1999. 1403.
36. Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823-837.
37. Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., Mandisodza, A. N., Sherman, S. J., Petrocelli, J. V., & Johnson, A. L. (2007). Panglossian ideology in the service of system justification: How complementary stereotypes help us to rationalize inequality. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 305-358). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
38. Knowles, E. D., Lowery, B. S., Hogan, C. H., & Chow, R. M. (2009). On the malleability of ideology: Motivated construals of color blindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 857-869. doi: 10. 1037/a0013595.
39. Kugler, M. B., Cooper, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2010). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality correspond to different psychological motives. Social Justice Research, 23, 117-155. doi: 10. 1007/s11211-010-0112-5.
40. LaFree, G. D. (1980). The effect of sexual stratification by race on official reactions to rape. American Sociological Review, 45, 842-854. doi: 10. 2307/2094898.
41. Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030-1051. doi: 10. 1037/0033-2909. 85. 5. 1030.
42. Lisak, D., & Miller, P. M. (2002). Repeat rape and multiple offending among undetected rapists. Violence and Victims, 17, 73-84. doi: 10. 1891/vivi. 17. 1. 73. 33638.
43. Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133-164. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1471-6402. 1994. tb00448. x.
44. Mirels, H. L., & Garrett, J. B. (1971). The Protestant ethic as a personality variable. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 40-44. doi: 10. 1037/h0030477.
45. Nail, P. R., McGregor, I., Drinkwater, A. E., Steele, G. M., & Thompson, A. W. (2009). Threat causes liberals to think like conservatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 901-907. doi: 10. 1016/j. jesp. 2009. 04. 013.
46. Overbeck, J., Jost, J. T., Mosso, C., & Flizik, A. (2004). Resistant vs. acquiescent responses to group inferiority as a function of social dominance orientation in the USA and Italy. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 7, 35-54. doi: 10. 1177/1368430204039972.
47. Patton, T. O., & Snyder-Yuly, J. (2007). Any four black men will do: Rape, race, and the ultimate scapegoat. Journal of Black Studies, 37, 859-895. doi: 10. 1177/0021934706296025.
48. Payne, D. L., Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27-68. doi: 10. 1006/jrpe. 1998. 2238.
49. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 67. 4. 741.
50. Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., & Sidanius, J. (1997). The gender gap: Differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 49-68. doi: 10. 1111/j. 2044-8309. 1997. tb01118. x.
51. Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437-448. doi: 10. 3102/10769986031004437.
52. Pula, K., McPherson, S., & Parks, C. D. (2012). Invariance of a two-factor model of social dominance orientation across gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 385-389. doi: 10. 1016/j. paid. 2011. 10. 046.
53. Ståhl, T., Eek, D., & Kazemi, A. (2010). Rape victim blaming as system justification: The role of gender and activation of complementary stereotypes. Social Justice Research, 23, 239-258. doi: 10. 1007/s11211-010-0117-0.
54. Törnblom, K., & Kazemi, A. (2010). Justice judgments of physical abuse and theft: The importance of outcome and procedure. Social Justice Research, 23, 308-328. doi: 10. 1007/s11211-010-0121-4.
55. Uhlmann, E. L., Brescoll, V. L., & Machery, E. (2010). The motives underlying stereotype-based discrimination against members of stigmatized groups. Social Justice Research, 23, 1-16. doi: 10. 1007/s11211-010-0110-7.
56. Viki, G. T., Abrams, D., & Masser, B. (2004). Evaluating stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent sexism in perpetrator blame and recommended sentence length. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 295-303. doi: 10. 1023/B: LAHU. 0000029140. 72880. 69.
57. Wakslak, C., Jost, J. T., Tyler, T. R., & Chen, E. (2007). Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive policies. Psychological Science, 18, 267-274. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 2007. 01887. x.
58. West, S. G., Aiken, L. S., & Krull, J. L. (1996). Experimental personality designs: Analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. Journal of Personality, 64, 1-48. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-6494. 1996. tb00813. x.
59. Wolfgang, M. E., & Riedel, M. (1975). Rape, race and the death penalty in Georgia. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 45, 658-668. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1939-0025. 1975. tb01193. x.
60. Yamawaki, N., Darby, R., & Queiroz, A. (2007). The moderating role of ambivalent sexism: The influence of power status on perception of rape victim and rapist. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147, 41-56. doi: 10. 3200/SOCP. 147. 1. 41-56.