Justice judgments of physical abuse and theft: The importance of outcome and procedure

Social Justice Research

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 308-328

  Törnblom, Kjell ^a   Kazemi, Ali ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SKÖVDE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Justice; Outcome; Physical abuse; Procedure; Theft

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650291960     PISSN: 08857466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11211-010-0121-4     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural justice and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research, 1, 177-198.
2. Austin, W. (1980). Friendship and fairness: Effects of type of relationship and task performance on choice of distribution rules. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 402-407.
3. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. M. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organisations (pp. 43-55). Greenwich: JAI Press.
4. Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189-208.
5. Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (2005). How, when, and why does outcome favorability interact with procedural fairness? In J. Greenbeg & J. A. Coiquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 525-553). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
6. Darley, J. (2002). Just punishments: Research on retributional justice. In M. Ross & D. T. Miller (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life (pp. 314-333). New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-149.
8. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice. A social psychological perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.
9. Elwork, A., Sales, B. D., & Alfini, J. (1977). Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it?Law and Human Behavior, 1, 163-189.
10. Foa, U. G. (1971). Interpersonal and economic resources. Science, 171, 345-351.
11. Foa, E. B., & Foa, U. G. (1976). Resource theory of social exchange. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology (pp. 99-131). Morristown: General Learning Press.
12. Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115-130.
13. Greenberg, J. (1978). Allocator-recipient similarity and the equitable division of rewards. Social Psychology, 41, 337-341.
14. Greenberg, J. (2004). Stress fairness to fare no stress: Managing workplace stress by promoting organizational justice. Organizational Dynamics, 33, 352-365.
15. Hassebrauck, M. (1984). Die beeinflussung von reaktionen auf distributive ungerechtigkeit durch die art der sozialbeziehung. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 15, 278-289.
16. Hegtvedt, K. A. (1993). Approaching distributive and procedural justice: Are separate routes necessary? In B. J. Lawler, B. Markovsky, K. Heimer, & J. O'Brien (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 10, pp. 195-221). Greenwich: JAI.
17. Hegtvedt, K. A., & Markovsky, B. (1995). Justice and injustice. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 257-280). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
18. Hogan, R., & Emler, N. P. (1981). Retributive justice. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior. Adapting to times of scarcity and change (pp. 125-143). New York: Plenum Press.
19. Horai, J., & Bartek, M. (1978). Recommended punishment as a function of injurious intent, actual harm done, and intended consequences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 575-578.
20. Horan, H. D., & Kaplan, M. F. (1983). Criminal intent and consequence severity: Effects of moral reasoning on punishment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 638-645.
21. Karniol, R., & Miller, D. T. (1981). Morality and the development of conceptions of justice. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior. Adapting to times of scarcity and change (pp. 73-90). New York: Plenum Press.
22. Kidder, L. H., Fagan, M. A., & Cohn, E. S. (1981). Giving and receiving. Social justice in close relationships. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior. Adapting to times of scarcity and change (pp. 235-259). New York: Plenum Press.
23. Krutli, P., Stauffacher, M., Flueler, T., & Scholz, R. W. (2008). Can fair processes compensate for unfair distributions?-The total fairness model as applied to a (contentious) real-world problem. Paper presented at the 12th biennial conference of the international society for justice research, Adelaide, Australia.
24. Lamm, H., & Kayser, E. (1978). An analysis of negotiation concerning the allocation of jointly produced profit or loss: The roles of justice norms, politeness, profit maximization, and tactics. International Journal of Group Tensions, 8, 64-80.
25. Lamm, H., Kayser, E., & Schanz, V. (1983). An attributional analysis of interpersonal justice: Ability and effort as inputs in the allocation of gain and loss. The Journal of Social Psychology, 119, 269-281.
26. Lerner, M. J. (1974). The justice motive: "equity" and "parity" among children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 538-550.
27. Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1-52.
28. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum Press.
29. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
30. Miller, D. T. (2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 527-553.
31. Mills, J., & Clark, M. S. (1982). Exchange and communal relationships. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 121-144). Beverly Hills: Sage.
32. Randall, C. S., & Mueller, C. W. (1995). Extensions of justice theory: Justice evaluations and employees' reactions in a natural setting. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 178-194.
33. Rosen, B., & Jerdee, T. H. (1974). Factors influencing disciplinary judgment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 327-331.
34. Rossi, P. H., Simpson, J. E., & Miller, J. L. (1985). Beyond crime seriousness: Fitting the punishment to the crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1, 59-73.
35. Rossi, P. H., Waite, E., Bose, C. E., & Berk, R. E. (1974). The seriousness of crimes: Normative structure and individual differences. American Sociological Review, 39, 224-237.
36. Thompson, J. (2007). Transitional justice in historical perspective. Social Justice Research, 20, 511-522.
37. Törnblom, K. Y. (1992). The social psychology of distributive justice. In K. Scherer (Ed.), Justice: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 177-236). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Törnblom, K, Y., & Jonsson, D. R. (1987). Distribution vs. retribution: The perceived justice of the contribution and equality principles for cooperative and competitive relationships. Acta Sociologica, 30, 25-52.
39. Törnblom, K. Y., & Vermunt, R. (Eds.). (1998). Special issue on fairness conceptions in the contexts of positive and negative outcome allocations: Part I. Social Justice Research, 11, 377-442.
40. Törnblom, K. Y., & Vermunt, R. (1999a). An integrative perspective on social justice: Distributive and procedural fairness evaluations of positive and negative outcome allocations. Social Justice Research, 12, 37-61.
41. Törnblom, K. Y., & Vermunt, R. (Eds.). (1999b). Special issue on Fairness conceptions in the contexts of positive and negative outcome allocations: Part II. Social Justice Research, 12, 1-64.
42. Tyler, T. R., Boeckman, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder: Westview.
43. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). San Diego: Academic Press.
44. Vidmar, N. (2000). Retribution and revenge. In J. Sanders & V. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in law (pp. 31-63). New York: Kluwer/Plenum Press.
45. Vidmar, N. (2002). Retributive justice: Its social context. In M. Ross & D. T. Miller (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life (pp. 291-313). New York: Cambridge University Press.
46. Vidmar, N., & Miller, D. T. (1980). Social psychological processes underlying attitudes toward legal punishment. Law and Society, 14, 565-602.
47. Younts, C. W. 1997. Justice, expectations, and procedural consequences: Toward an integrated theory of procedural and distributive justice. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Sociological Association (Toronto, Canada).