The relationship between social dominance orientation and gender: The mediating role of social values

Sex Roles

Volumn 57, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages 159-171

  Caricati, Luca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Gender differences; Social dominance orientation; Social values

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547670501     PISSN: 03600025     EISSN: 15732762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-007-9231-3     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Aiello, A., Chirumbolo, A., Leone, L., & Pratto, F. (2005). Uno studio di Adattamento e Validazione della scala di Orientamento/Tendenza alla Dominanza Sociale (Pratto et al. 1994) [A study for the validation of the social dominance orientation scale]. Rassegna di Psicologia, 22, 65-75.
2. Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other "authoritarian personality". In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 30 (pp. 47-92). New York: Academic.
3. Arbuckle, J. L. (2003). Amos 5.0 [Computer Software]. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5. Bem, S. L. (1974). Measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.
6. Bond, M. (1988). Finding universal dimensions of individual variation in multicultural studies of values: The Rokeach and Chinese value surveys. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 1009-1015.
7. Capanna, C., Vecchione, M., & Schwartz, S. H. (2005). La misura dei valori: un contributo alla validazione del Portrait Values Questionnaire su un campione italiano. [The measurement of values. A contribution to the validation of the Portrait Value Questionnaire on an Italian sample]. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 246, 29-41.
8. Caricati, L. (2007a). Orientamento alla dominanza sociale e ipotesi dell'asimmetria ideologica fra maschi e femmine: un'analisi con il modello di Rasch [Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) and asymmetry hypothesis between men and women: An analysis via the Rasch Model]. (in press).
9. Caricati, L. (2007b). Organizzazione, gerarchia e struttura valoriale nei giovani adolescenti: il modello di Schwartz e l'utilizzo del Portrait Value Questionnaire (PVQ).[Organization, hierarchy and structure of values among young adolescents: The Schwartz's Model and use of the Portrait Value Questionnaire (PVQ)]. Rassegna di Psicologia, 24, 147-158.
10. Chatard, A., Guimond, S., Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., & Désert, M. (2005). Domination masculine et identité de genre. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 67-68, 113-123.
11. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, (3rd edn.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
12. Dambrun, M., Duarte, S., & Guimond, S. (2004). Why are men more likely to support group-based dominance than women? The mediating role of gender identification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 287-297.
13. Devos, T., Spini, D., & Schwartz, S. H. (2002). Conflicts among human values and trust in institutions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 481-494.
14. Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 33 (pp. 41-113). San Diego, CA: Academic.
15. Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75-93.
16. Duriez, B., & Van Hiel, A. (2002). The march of modern fascism. A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1199-1213.
17. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408-423.
18. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Taunter (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123-174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. EURISPES (2005). Rapporto Italia 2005. Consulted online at: http://www.eurispes.it/.
20. Feather, N. T. (1984). Masculinity, femininity, psychological androgyny, and the structure of values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 604-620.
21. Foels, R., & Pappas, C. J. (2004). Learning and unlearning the myths we are taught: Gender and social dominance orientation. Sex roles, 50, 743-757.
22. Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763-775.
23. Heaven, P. C. L., & Connors, J. R. (2001). A note on the value correlates of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 925-930.
24. Hitlin, S., & Piliavin, J. A. (2004). Values: Reviving a dormant concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 359-393.
25. Huang, L. L., & Liu, J. H. (2005). Personality and social structural implications of the situational priming of social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 249-499.
26. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
27. Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209-232.
28. Kenny, D. A. (2005). Mediation analysis. Retrieved October 9, 2006, from: http://users.rcn.com/dakenny/mediate.htm.
29. Lyons, S., Duxbury, L., & Higgins, C. (2005). Are gender differences in basic human values a generational phenomenon? Sex roles, 53, 763-778.
30. Maio, G. R., Olson, J. M., Bernard, M. M., & Luke, M. A. (2003). Ideologies, values, attitudes, and behaviour. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 283-308). New York: Plenum.
31. McFarland, S. G. (1998). Toward a typology of prejudiced persons. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Society for Political Psychology, Montreal, Canada, July 1998.
32. McFarland, S. G. (1999). Personality, values, and latent prejudice: A test of a causal model. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Society for Political Psychology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, July 1999.
33. McFarland, S. G., & Adelson, S. (1996). An omnibus study of personality, values, and prejudice. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Society for Political Psychology, Vancouver, British Columbia, July 1996.
34. Pratto, F. (1999). The puzzle of continuing group inequality: Piecing together psychological, social, and cultural forces in social dominance theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 31 (pp. 191-263). San Diego: Academic.
35. Pratto, F., & Hegarty, P. (2000). The political psychology of reproductive strategies. Psychological Science, 11, 57-61.
36. Pratto, F., Liu, J. H., Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Shih, M., Bachrach, H., et al. (2000). Social dominance orientation and the legitimization of inequality across cultures. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 31, 369-409.
37. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
38. Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., & Sidanius. J. (1997). The gender gap: Differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 49-68.
39. Prince-Gibson, E., & Schwartz, S. H. (1998). Value priorities and gender. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 49-67.
40. Ray, J. J. (2006). Social dominance orientation: Theory or artefact?. Retrieved October 9, 2006, from: http://jonjayray.netfirms.com/sdo.html.
41. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
42. Rubin, M., & Hewstone, M. (2004). Social identity, system justification, and social dominance: Commentary on Reicher, Jost et al., and Sidanius et al. Political Psychology, 25, 823-844.
43. Ryckman, R. M., & Houston, D. M. (2003). Value priorities in American and British female and male university students. Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 127-138.
44. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 25 (pp. 1-65). New York: Academic.
45. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the content and structure of values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-45.
46. Schwartz, S. H. (2004). Robustness and fruitfulness of a theory of universals in individual human values. In A. Tamayo & J. Porto (Eds.), Valores e trabalho [Values and work]. Brasilia: Editora Universidade de Brasilia.
47. Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 32, 268-290.
48. Schwartz, S. H., & Boehnke, K. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 230-255.
49. Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burges, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 32,519-542.
50. Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1010-1028.
51. Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 26, 92-116.
52. Sidanius, J. (1993). The psychology of group conflict and the dynamics of oppression: A social dominance perspective. In S. Iyengar & W. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in Political Psychology (pp. 183-219). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
53. Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Liu, J. H., & Pratto, F. (2000). Social dominance orientation, antiegalitarianism and the political psychology of gender: An extension and cross-cultural replication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 41-67.
54. Sidanius, J., & Liu, J. (1992). The gulf war and the Rodney King beating: Implications of the general conservatism and social dominance perspectives. Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 685-700.
55. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
56. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1994). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 998-1011.
57. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476-490.
58. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1974). The personal attributes questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43.
59. Struch, N., Schwartz, S. H., & van der Kloot, W. A. (2002). Meanings of basic values for women and men: A cross-cultural analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 16-28.
60. Triandis, H. C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. The American Psychologist, 51, 407-415.
61. Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. J. (2003). Why social dominance theory has been falsified. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 199-206.
62. Ward, D. (1995). Social dominance theory: Are the genes too tight? Paper presented at the Eighteenth Annual Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Washington, DC.
63. Wilson, M. S., & Liu, J. H. (2003). Social dominance orientation and gender: The moderating role of gender identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 187-198.