Planning and adjustments for the control of reach extent in a virtual environment

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Stewart, Jill Campbell ^a   Gordon, James ^a   Winstein, Carolee J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Motor planning; Reaching; Upper extremity; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ANTICIPATION; ARM; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HAND; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STATISTICAL MODEL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ANTICIPATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ARM; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOTOR SKILLS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84874397757     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-27     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Holden MK, Cyberpsychol Behav 2005 8 187 211 discussion 212-189 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.187 15971970 (Pubitemid 40847797)
2. Virtual reality and haptics as a training device for movement rehabilitation after stroke: a single-case study. Broeren J, Rydmark M, Sunnerhagen KS, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004 85 1247 1250 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.09. 020 15295748 (Pubitemid 39024423)
3. Guest editorial: the potential of virtual reality for rehabilitation. Weiss PL, Katz N, Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 2004 41 22ii x 21272730
4. Effects of altering initial position on movement direction and extent. Sainburg RL, Lateiner JE, Latash ML, Bagesteiro LB, J Neurophysiol 2003 89 401 415 12522189 (Pubitemid 36134031)
5. Interlimb differences in control of movement extent. Sainburg RL, Schaefer SY, J Neurophysiol 2004 92 1374 1383 10.1152/jn.00181.2004 15115793 (Pubitemid 39100639)
6. The role of execution noise in movement variability. van Beers RJ, Haggard P, Wolpert DM, J Neurophysiol 2004 91 1050 1063 14561687 (Pubitemid 38168871)
7. The role of inertial sensitivity in motor planning. Sabes PN, Jordan MI, Wolpert DM, J Neurosci 1998 18 5948 5957 9671681 (Pubitemid 28341370)
8. Flexible strategies for sensory integration during motor planning. Sober SJ, Sabes PN, Nat Neurosci 2005 8 490 497 15793578 (Pubitemid 41007567)
9. Reaching within video-capture virtual reality: using virtual reality as a motor control paradigm. Dvorkin AY, Shahar M, Weiss PL, Cyberpsycholology & Behavior 2006 9 133 136 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.133
10. Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis. Viau A, Feldman AG, McFadyen BJ, Levin MF, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2004 1 11 10.1186/1743-0003-1-11 15679937 (Pubitemid 40397793)
11. Kinematics of pointing movements made in a virtual versus a physical 3-dimensional environment in healthy and stroke subjects. Knaut LA, Subramanian SK, McFadyen BJ, Bourbonnais D, Levin MF, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009 90 793 802 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.10.030 19406299
12. Comparison of grasping movements made by healthy subjects in a 3-dimensional immersive virtual versus physical environment. Magdalon EC, Michaelsen SM, Quevedo AA, Levin MF, Acta Psychol (Amst) 2011 138 126 134 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.05.015
13. Differential effect of task conditions on errors of direction and extent of reaching movements. Messier J, Kalaska JF, Exp Brain Res 1997 115 469 478 10.1007/PL00005716 9262201 (Pubitemid 27296444)
14. Goal-directed reaching: movement strategies influence the weighting of allocentric and egocentric visual cues. Neely KA, Tessmer A, Binsted G, Heath M, Exp Brain Res 2008 186 375 384 10.1007/s00221-007-1238-z 18087697
15. Effects of roll visual motion on online control of arm movement: reaching within a dynamic virtual environment. Dvorkin AY, Kenyon RV, Keshner EA, Exp Brain Res 2009 193 95 107 10.1007/s00221-008-1598-z 18936925
16. The influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to a stationary object. Whitney D, Westwood DA, Goodale MA, Nature 2003 423 869 873 10.1038/nature01693 12815432 (Pubitemid 36781278)
17. The influence of target sensory modality on motor planning may reflect errors in sensori-motor transformations. Sarlegna FR, Przybyla A, Sainburg RL, Neuroscience 2009 164 597 610 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.07.057 19647787
18. Sensorimotor representations for pointing to targets in three-dimensional space. Soechting JF, Flanders M, J Neurophysiol 1989 62 582 594 2769349 (Pubitemid 19208085)
19. Errors in pointing are due to approximations in sensorimotor transformations. Soechting JF, Flanders M, J Neurophysiol 1989 62 595 608 2769350 (Pubitemid 19208086)
20. The effect of target modality on visual and proprioceptive contributions to the control of movement distance. Sarlegna FR, Sainburg RL, Exp Brain Res 2006 176 267 280
21. Multisensory integration during motor planning. Sober SJ, Sabes PN, J Neurosci 2003 23 6982 6992 12904459 (Pubitemid 36975864)
22. Accuracy of planar reaching movements. II. Systematic extent errors resulting from inertial anisotropy. Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Cooper SE, Ghez C, Exp Brain Res 1994 99 112 130 10.1007/BF00241416 7925785 (Pubitemid 24169581)
23. Comparison of variability of initial kinematics and endpoints of reaching movements. Messier J, Kalaska JF, Exp Brain Res 1999 125 139 152 10.1007/s002210050669 10204767 (Pubitemid 29139933)
24. Accuracy of planar reaching movements. I. Independence of direction and extent variability. Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C, Exp Brain Res 1994 99 97 111 10.1007/BF00241415 7925800 (Pubitemid 24169580)
25. Organizing principles for single-joint movements. I. A speed-insensitive strategy. Gottlieb GL, Corcos DM, Agarwal GC, J Neurophysiol 1989 62 342 357 2769334 (Pubitemid 19208065)
26. Common principles underlying the control of rapid, single degree-of-freedom movements at different joints. Pfann KD, Hoffman DS, Gottlieb GL, Strick PL, Corcos DM, Exp Brain Res 1998 118 35 51 10.1007/s002210050253 9547076 (Pubitemid 28052676)
27. Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. I. Role of opposing muscles. Ghez C, Gordon J, Exp Brain Res 1987 67 225 240 3622686 (Pubitemid 17105376)
28. Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. II. Pulse height control. Gordon J, Ghez C, Exp Brain Res 1987 67 241 252 10.1007/BF00248546 3622687 (Pubitemid 17105377)
29. Initial agonist burst duration depends on movement amplitude. Brown SH, Cooke JD, Exp Brain Res 1984 55 523 527 6468556 (Pubitemid 14085207)
30. Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. III. Compensatory adjustments for initial errors. Gordon J, Ghez C, Exp Brain Res 1987 67 253 269 10.1007/BF00248547 3622688 (Pubitemid 17105378)
31. Control of velocity and position in single joint movements. Mutha PK, Sainburg RL, Hum Mov Sci 2007 26 808 823 10.1016/j.humov.2007.06.001 17931729 (Pubitemid 350091323)
32. Deficits in compensatory trajectory adjustments after unilateral sensorimotor stroke. Fisher BE, Winstein CJ, Velicki MR, Exp Brain Res 2000 132 328 344 10.1007/s002219900316 10883381 (Pubitemid 30330208)
33. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Oldfield RC, Neuropsychologia 1971 9 97 113 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 5146491
34. Winter D, Biomechanics and motor control of human movement Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc 3 2005
35. Portney L, Watkins M, Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall 3 2009
36. Spatial control of arm movements. Morasso P, Exp Brain Res 1981 42 223 227 7262217 (Pubitemid 11147291)
37. Responses to force perturbations preceding voluntary human arm movements. Brown SH, Cooke JD, Brain Res 1981 220 350 355 10.1016/0006-8993(81)91224-5 7284760 (Pubitemid 11061864)
38. Viewing medium affects arm motor performance in 3D virtual environments. Subramanian SK, Levin MF, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011 8 36 10.1186/1743-0003-8-36 21718542
39. Contribution of planning and updating to accuracy of reaching movements in normals and stroke. Krakauer J, Gordon J, Veytsman M, Ghez C, Soc Neurosci Abstr 2002 169 164
40. Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Desmurget M, Grafton S, Trends Cogn Sci 2000 4 423 431 10.1016/S1364-6613(00) 01537-0 11058820
41. Computational principles of movement neuroscience