A proposal for plastic hinges modification factors for damaged RC columns

Engineering Structures

Volumn 51, Issue , 2013, Pages 99-112

  Di Ludovico, Marco ^a   Polese, Maria ^a   Gaetani d'Aragona, Marco ^a   Prota, Andrea ^a   Manfredi, Gaetano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Earthquake damage; Experimental based calibration; Modification factors; Performance loss; Plastic hinge; RC column

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE DAMAGES; MODIFICATION FACTORS; PERFORMANCE LOSS; PLASTIC HINGES; RC COLUMN;

EARTHQUAKES; HINGES; SEISMIC DESIGN; STIFFNESS;

DUCTILITY;

BUILDING; CALIBRATION; COLUMN; CONCRETE STRUCTURE; DISPLACEMENT; DUCTILITY; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; REINFORCED CONCRETE; STIFFNESS; STRENGTH;

MEDITERRANEAN REGION;

EID: 84874388606     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.01.009     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Nakano Y, Maeda M, Kuramoto H, Murakami M. Guideline for post-earthquake damage evaluation and rehabilitation of RC buildings in Japan. In: 13th World conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 2004. Paper no 124.
2. ATC 20. Procedures for post-earthquake safety evaluation of buildings. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California; 1989.
3. Baggio C, Bernardini A, Colozza R, Di Pasquale G, Dolce M, Goretti A, et al. Field manual for post-earthquake damage and safety assessment and short term countermeasures AeDES, EUR 22868 EN-2007. Joint Research Center, Ispra, Italy; 2007.
4. Dandoulaki M, Panoutsopoulou M, Ioannides K. An overview of post-earthquake building inspection practices in Greece and the introduction of a rapid building usability evaluation procedure after the 1996 Konitsa earthquake. In: Proceedings of the 11th European conference on earthquake engineering, Balkema, Rotterdam; 1998.
5. Holmes W.T. Policies and standards for reoccupancy repair of earthquake-damaged buildings. Earthq Spectra 1994, 10(1):197-208.
6. FEMA 306. Evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings - basic procedures manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC; 1998.
7. FEMA 307. Evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings - technical resources. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC; 1998.
8. JBDPA, The Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association. Guideline for post-earthquake damage evaluation and rehabilitation; 1977, revised in 1990 and 2001 [in Japanese].
9. Maeda M, Nakano Y, Lee KS. Post-earthquake damage evaluation for R/C buildings based on residual seismic capacity. In: 13th World conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 2004. Paper no 1179.
10. Bazzurro P, Cornell CA, Menun CA, Motahari M. Guidelines for seismic assessment of damaged buildings. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 2004. Paper no 1708.
11. Maffei J, Telleen K, Mohr D, Holmes W, Nakayama Y. Test applications of advanced seismic assessment guidelines. Report no PEER 2005/09, prepared for Pacific Gas & Electric Company and Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, Berkeley, CA; October 2004.
12. Bal I.E., Crowley H., Pinho R., Gülay G. Detailed assessment of structural characteristics of Turkish RC building stock for loss assessment models. Soil Dynam Earthq Eng 2008, 28:914-932.
13. Verderame G.M., Ricci P., Manfredi G., Cosenza E. Ultimate chord rotation of RC columns with smooth bars: some considerations about EC8 prescriptions. Bull Earthq Eng 2010, 8(June):1351-1373.
14. DolŠek M. Development of computing environment for the seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete frames by using simplified nonlinear models. Bull Earthq Eng 2010, 8(May):1309-1329.
15. Fajfar P. Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 1999, 28(August):979-993.
16. Polese M., Verderame G.M., Mariniello C., Iervolino I., Manfredi G. Vulnerability curves for gravity load designed RC buildings in Naples - Italy. J Earthq Eng 2008, 12(S2):234-245. ISSN 1363-2469.
17. Polese M., Di Ludovico M., Prota A., Manfredi G. Damage dependent vulnerability curves for existing buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 2012, 10.1002/eqe.2249.
18. Fabbrocino G., Verderame G.M., Manfredi G. Experimental behavior of anchored smooth rebars in old type reinforced concrete buildings. Eng Struct 2005, 27(10):1575-1585.
19. PEER, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. Structural performance database. University of California, Berkeley. http://nisee.berkeley.edu/spd/.
20. Berry M, Parrish M, Eberhard M. PEER structural performance database user's manual. Pacific Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California, 38 pp. http://nisee.berkeley.edu/spd/.
21. ASCE SEI 41-06. Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings, ASCE standard, published by the American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia; 2007.
22. Atalay MB, Penzien J. The seismic behavior of critical regions of reinforced concrete components as influenced by moment, shear and axial force. Report no EERC 75-19. University of California, Berkeley; December 1975. 226 p.
23. Nosho K, Stanton J, MacRae G. Retrofit of rectangular reinforced concrete columns using Tonen Forca tow sheet carbon fiber wrapping. Report no SGEM 96-2. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; July 1996.
24. Matamoros AB. Study of drift limits for high-strength concrete columns. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois; October 1999.
25. Lynn A.C., Moehle J.P., Mahin S.A., Holmes W.T. Seismic evaluation of existing reinforced concrete columns. Earthq Spectra 1996, 21(4):715-739.
26. Di Ludovico M, Verderame GM, Prota A, Manfredi G, Cosenza E. Experimental investigation on non-conforming full scale RC columns. In: ANIDIS 2009 conference, Bologna, Italy; 2009.
27. Di Ludovico M., Verderame G., Prota A., Manfredi G., Cosenza E. Experimental behavior of non-conforming RC columns with plain bars under biaxial bending. ASCE, J Struct Eng 2012, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000703).
28. Verderame G.M., Fabbrocino G., Manfredi G. Seismic response of r.c. columns with smooth reinforcement. Part I: monotonic tests. Eng Struct 2008, 30(9):2277-2288.
29. Verderame G.M., Fabbrocino G., Manfredi G. Seismic response of r.c. columns with smooth reinforcement. Part II: cyclic tests. Eng Struct 2008, 30(9):2289-2300.
30. Acun B., Sucuoglu H. Performance of flexure controlled concrete columns under severe displacement cycles. ACI Struct J 2010, 107(3):364-371.
31. ACI 369R-11. Guide for seismic rehabilitation of existing concrete frame buildings and commentary. ACI Committee 369, technical committee document 369R-11; 2011. 35 pp.
32. Elwood K.J., Matamoros A., Wallace J.W., Lehman D.E., Heintz J.A., Mitchell A., et al. Update of ASCE/SEI 41 concrete provisions. Earthq Spectra 2007, 23(3):493-523.
33. Elwood K.J., Eberhard M.O. Effective stiffness of reinforced concrete columns. ACI Struct J, Am Concr Inst 2009, 106(4):476-484.
34. Fardis MN, Biskinis DE. Deformation capacity of r.c. members, as controlled by flexure or shear. In: Kabeyasawa T, Shiohara H, editors. Performance based engineering for earthquake resistant reinforced concrete structures: a volume honoring Shunsuke Otani. University of Tokyo; 2003. p. 511.
35. Krawinkler H., Seneviratna G.D.P.K. Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation. Eng Struct 1998, 20:452-464.
36. Comitée Européen de Normalisation. European Standard EN 1998-1: Eurocode 8. Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1. General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. CEN, Brussels; 2005.
37. Comitée Européen de Normalisation, European Standard EN 1998-3: Eurocode 8. Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 3. Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. CEN, Brussels; 2004.
38. Fajfar P. Equivalent ductility factors taking into account low cycle fatigue. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 1992, 21:837-848.
39. Sucuǒlu H., Erberik A. Energy-based hysteresis and damage models for deteriorating systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 2004, 33:69-88.
40. Cosenza E., Manfredi G., Polese M. A simplified method to include cumulative damage in the seismic response of SDOF systems. J Eng Mech, ASCE 2009, 135(10):1081-1088.
41. Polese M, Di Ludovico M, Prota A, Manfredi G. Residual capacity of earthquake damaged buildings. In: 15th World conference on earthquake engineering, Lisboa, Portugal; 2012. Paper no 1005.
42. Goretti A, Inukai M. Post-earthquake usability and damage evaluation of reinforced concrete buildings designed not according to modern seismic codes, technical report SSN/RRT/02/01; March 2002.