Damage-dependent vulnerability curves for existing buildings

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 853-870

  Polese, Maria ^a   Di Ludovico, Marco ^a   Prota, Andrea ^a   Manfredi, Gaetano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Collapse fragility; Damage; Pushover; Reparability; Residual capacity; Vulnerability variation

Indexed keywords

HINGES; SECONDARY BATTERIES;

COLLAPSE FRAGILITIES; DAMAGE; PUSHOVER; REPARABILITY; RESIDUAL CAPACITY; VULNERABILITY VARIATION;

EARTHQUAKES;

CONCRETE STRUCTURE; DAMAGE MECHANICS; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STIFFNESS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 84876310585     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2249     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ATC Procedures for the Post Earthquake Safety Evaluation of Buildings, Applied Technology Council. ATC-20 Report, Redwood City, California, 1989.
2. Baggio C, Bernardini A, Colozza R, Di Pasquale G, Dolce M, Goretti A, Martinelli A, Orsini G, Papa F, Zuccaro G, Pinto AV, Taucer F. Field Manual for post-earthquake damage and safety assessment and short term countermeasures (AeDES). EUR 22868 EN, Joint Research Center, ISPRA, Italy, 2007.
3. Amadio C, Fragiacomo M, Rajgelj S. The effects of repeated earthquake ground motions on the non-linear response of SDOF systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32:291-308.
4. Jalayer F, Asprone D, Prota A, Manfredi G. A decision support system for post-earthquake reliability assessment of structures subjected to aftershocks: an application to L'Aquila earthquake, 2009. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2011; 9:997-1014.
5. Fragiacomo M, Amadio C, Macorini L. Seismic response of steel frames under repeated earthquake ground motions. Engineering Structures 2004; 26:2021-2035.
6. Krawinkler H, Seneviratna GDPK. Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation. Engineering Structures 1998; 20:452-464.
7. Chopra AK, Goel RK. A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 33:903-927.
8. Fajfar P. Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999; 28:979-93.
9. FEMA. FEMA 306: Evaluation Of Earthquake Damaged Concrete And Masonry Wall Buildings - Basic procedures manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency: Washington DC, 1998.
10. th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, B.C., Canada. Paper No. 1708, 2004.
11. Maffei J, Telleen K, Mohr D, Holmes W. Test Applications of Advanced Seismic Assessment Guidelines. PEER Report 2005/09, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2006.
12. Yazgan U, Dazio A. Post-earthquake damage assessment using residual displacements. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2011. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.1184
13. Yazgan U, Dazio A. The use of post-earthquake residual displacements as a performance indicator in seismic assessment. Georisk 2011; 5(1):59-76.
14. Hatzigeorgiou GD, Papagiannopoulos GA, Beskos DE. Evaluation of maximum seismic displacements of SDOF systems from their residual deformation. Engineering Structures 2011; 33:3422-3431.
15. Polese M, Prota A, Manfredi G, Dolce M. Residual drifts in earthquake damaged R.C. buildings. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 2012; submitted.
16. FEMA. FEMA 307: Evaluation Of Earthquake Damaged Concrete And Masonry Wall Buildings - Technical Resources. Federal Emergency Management Agency: Washington DC, 1998.
17. th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada. Paper No. 124, 2004.
18. Di Ludovico M, Polese M, Gaetani D'Aragona M, Prota A, Manfredi G. Modeling of damaged RC columns in nonlinear static analyses: a proposal for plastic hinges modification factors. Engineering Structures, submitted.
19. th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, B.C., Canada. Paper No. 3353, 2004.
20. ASCE-SEI 41-06. Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, ASCE Standard. American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, Virginia, 2007.
21. ACI 369R-11. Guide for Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Concrete Frame Buildings and Commentary. Reported by ACI committee 369, American Concrete Institute, 2011. ISBN: 978-0-87031-419-3
22. Dolšek M. Development of computing environment for the seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete frames by using simplified nonlinear models. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2010; 8:1309-1329.
23. FEMA HAZUS99. Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology: User's Manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency: Washington DC, 1999.
24. Polese M, Prota A, Manfredi G. Residual capacity of r.c. earthquake damaged buildings. XIV Convegno Anidis, Bari, 18-22 September 2011 (in Italian).
25. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell A. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31(3):491-514.
26. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell A. Direct Estimation of the Seismic Demand and Capacity of Oscillators with Multi-Linear Static Pushovers through IDA. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35:1097-1117.
27. ATC 58-1 75% Draft. Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings Volume 1 - Methodology. Applied Technology Council: Redwood City, California, 2011.
28. Fajfar P. A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthquake Spectra 2000; 16(3):573-92.
29. Vidic T, Fajfar P, Fischinger M. Consistent inelastic design spectra: strength and displacement. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1994; 23:507-521.
30. Dolšek M, Fajfar P. The effect of masonry infills on the seismic response of a four storey reinforced concrete frame - a probabilistic assessment. Engineering Structures 2008; 30(7):1991-2001.
31. Decreto Ministeriale n. 40 del 3/3/1975 Approvazione delle norme tecniche per le costruzioni in zone sismiche. G.U. n. 93 dell'8/4/1975 (in Italian).
32. Ricci P, De Luca F, Verderame GM. 6th April 2009L'Aquila earthquake, Italy: reinforced concrete building performance. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2011; 9:285-305.
33. Comitée Européen de Normalisation, European Standard EN 1998-3: Eurocode8. Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 3. Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. CEN: Brussels, 2004.
34. Mwafy AM, Elnashai AS. Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings. Engineering Structures 2001; 23(2001):407-424.
35. R.D.L. no. 2229/1939. Norme per l'esecuzione delle opere in conglomerate cementizio semplice o armato 1939, (In Italian), 1939.
36. D.M. May, 30th 1972 no. 9161. Norme tecniche per il calcolo, l'esecuzione, ed il collaudo delle strutture in conglomerato cementizio armato normale e precompresso e per le strutture metalliche, (In Italian), 1972.
37. Di Ludovico M, Verderame GM, Prota A, Manfredi G, Cosenza E. Experimental investigation on non-conforming RC columns with plain and deformed bars. ACI Structural Journal 2010, (submitted).
38. Elwood KJ, Eberhard MO. Effective Stiffness of Reinforced Concrete Columns. ACI Structural Journal 2009; 106-S45(4):476-484.
39. Comitée Européen de Normalisation, European Standard EN 1998-1: Eurocode8. Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1. General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. CEN: Brussels, 2005.
40. Holmes WT. Policies and standards for reoccupancy repair of earthquake-damaged buildings. Earthquake Spectra 1994; 10(3):197-208.
41. Fajfar P, Gašperšič P. The N2 method for the seismic damage analysis of RC buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1996; 25:31-46.
42. Faella G, Kilar V. Asymmetric multistorey R/C frame structures: push-over versus nonlinear dynamic analysis. In: Proceedings 11th ECEE, Paris, CD-Rom, 1996.