Simplified method to include cumulative damage in the seismic response of single-degree-of-freedom systems

Journal of Engineering Mechanics

Volumn 135, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1081-1088

  Cosenza, Edoardo ^a   Manfredi, Gaetano ^a   Polese, Maria ^a  

^a Dept of Structural Engineering ^*  (Italy)

Author keywords

Damage; Ductility; Fatigue; Seismic effects

Indexed keywords

CUMULATIVE DAMAGE; DAMAGE; DAMAGE CRITERIA; DAMAGE EFFECTS; DAMAGE INDEX; DAMAGE POTENTIAL; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGES; ENERGY INDEXES; EQUIVALENT DAMAGE; EXISTING STRUCTURE; FATIGUE; INELASTIC SPECTRA; LOW CYCLE FATIGUES; SEISMIC ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC EFFECTS; SIMPLIFIED EXPRESSIONS; SIMPLIFIED METHOD; SINGLE DEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEMS;

DAMAGE DETECTION; DAMS; DUCTILITY; EARTHQUAKES; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

FATIGUE DAMAGE;

CYCLIC LOADING; DAMAGE MECHANICS; DAMPING; DUCTILITY; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; FATIGUE; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SPECTRAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 70349521827     PISSN: 07339399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:10(1081)     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Applied Technology Council (ATC) 40. (1996). "Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings." Rep. No. SSC 96-01, ATC, Redwood City, Calif.
2. Applied Technology Council (ATC). (1998). "Evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings-Basic procedures manual." FEMA 306 Report, prepared by Applied Technology Council (ATC-43 project), for Partnership for Response and Recovery, Washington, D.C., funded by FEMA.
3. ASCE. (2000). "Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings" FEMA 356 Report, prepared by ASCE for FEMA, Washington, D.C.
4. Bozorgnia, Y., and Bertero, V. V. (2003). "Damage spectra: Characteristics and applications to seismic risk reduction." J. Struct. Eng. JSENDH0733-9445, 129(10), 1330-1340. 10.1061/ (ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:10(1330)
5. Calvi, G. M., and Kingsley, G. R. (1995). "Displacement-based seismic design of multi-degree-of-freedom bridges structures." Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. IJEEBG0098-8847, 24, 1247-1266. 10.1002/ eqe.4290240906
6. Chai, Y. H. (2005). "Incorporating low-cycle fatigue model into duration-dependent inelastic design spectra." Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. IJEEBG0098-8847, 34, 83-96. 10.1002/eqe.422
7. Chopra, A. K., and Goel, R. K. (2001). "Direct displacement based design: Use of inelastic versus elastic design spectra." Earthquake Spectra EASPEF8755-2930, 17(1), 47-64. 10.1193/1.1586166
8. Comitée Européen de Normalisation (CEN). (2003). "Design of structures for earthquake resistance-Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings-Part 3: Strengthening and repair of buildings." EN 1998-1, Brussels.Comitée Européen de Normalisation (CEN). (2003). "Design of structures for earthquake resistance-Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings-Part 3: Strengthening and repair of buildings." EN 1998-1, Brussels.
9. Cosenza, E., and Manfredi, G. (1996). "Seismic design based on low cycle fatigue criteria." Proc., 11th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
10. Cosenza, E., and Manfredi, G. (1997). "The improvement of the seismic resistant design for existing and new structures using damage concept." Seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes, P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler, eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 119-130.
11. Cosenza, E., Manfredi, G., and Ramasco, R. (1993). "The use of damage functionals in earthquake-resistant design: A comparison among different procedures." Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. IJEEBG0098-8847, 22, 855-868. 10.1002/eqe.4290221003
12. Fajfar, P. (1992). "Equivalent ductility factors taking into account low-cycle fatigue." Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. IJEEBG0098-8847, 21, 837-848. 10.1002/eqe.4290211001
13. Fédération international du béton (fib). (2003a). "Seismic assessment and retrofit of reinforced concrete buildings." State-of-Art Report.
14. Fédération international du béton (fib). (2003b). "Displacement based seismic design of reinforced concrete buildings." State-of-Art Report.
15. Hancock, J., and Bommer, J. J. (2005). "The effective number of cycles of earthquake ground motion." Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. IJEEBG0098-8847, 34, 637-664. 10.1002/eqe.437
16. Iervolino, I., Giorgio, M., Galasso, C., and Manfredi, G. (2008). "Prediction relationships for a vector-valued ground motion intensity measure accounting for cumulative damage potential." Proc., 4th WCEE-14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Mira Digital Publishing.
17. Iervolino, I., Manfredi, G., and Cosenza, E. (2006). "Ground motion duration effects on nonlinear seismic response." Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 35, 21-38. 10.1002/eqe.5290098-8847
18. Krawinkler, H., and Nassar, A. A. (1992). "Seismic design based on ductility and cumulative damage demands and capacities." Nonlinear seismic analysis of RC buildings, P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler, eds., Elsevier Science, New York, 23-40.
19. Krawinkler, H., and Zohrei, M. (1983). "Cumulative damage in steel structures subjected to earthquake ground motion." Comput. Struct. CMSTCJ0045-7949, 16, 531-541. 10.1016/0045-7949(83)90193-1
20. Kunnath, S. K., and Chai, Y. H. (2004). "Cumulative damage based inelastic cyclic demand spectrum." Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. IJEEBG0098-8847, 33, 499-520. 10.1002/eqe.363
21. Lu, Y., and Wei, J. (2008). "Damage-based inelastic response spectra for seismic design incorporating performance considerations." Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. SDEEEJ0267-7261, 28, 536-549. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.08.002
22. Malhotra, P. K. (2002). "Cyclic demand spectrum." Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. IJEEBG0098-8847, 31, 1441-1457.10.1002/eqe.171
23. Manfredi, G. (2001). "Evaluation of seismic energy demand." Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. IJEEBG0098-8847, 30(4), 485-499. 10.1002/ eqe.17
24. Manfredi, G., Polese, M., and Cosenza, E. (2003). "Cumulative demand of the earthquake ground motions in the near source." Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. IJEEBG0098-8847, 32(12), 1853-1865. 10.1002/ eqe.305
25. Miranda, E. (2001). "Estimation of inelastic deformation demands of SDOF systems." J. Struct. Eng. JSENDH0733-9445, 127(9), 1005-1012. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:9(1005)
26. Miranda, E., and Bertero, V. V. (1994). "Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant design." Earthquake Spectra EASPEF8755-2930, 10, 357-359. 10.1193/1.1585778
27. Newmark, N. M., and Hall, W. J. (1982). Earthquake spectra and design, EERI, Berkeley, Calif.
28. Park, Y. J., and Ang, A. H.-S. (1985). "Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete." J. Struct. Eng. JSENDH0733-9445, 111(4), 722-739. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722)
29. Park, Y. J., Ang, A. H.-S., and Wen, Y. K. (1987). "Damage-limiting aseismic design of buildings." Earthquake Spectra EASPEF8755-2930, 3(1), 1-26. 10.1193/1.1585416
30. Stephens, J. E., and Yao, J. T. P. (1987). "Damage assessment using response measurements." J. Struct. Eng. JSENDH0733-9445, 113(4), 787-801. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:4(787)
31. Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC). (1995). "Performance based seismic design engineering." Rep. Prepared for SEAOC Vision 2000 Committee, SEAOC, Sacramento, Calif.
32. Teran-Gilmore, A., and Jirsa, J. O. (2005). "A damage model for practical seismic design that accounts for low cycle fatigue." Earthquake Spectra EASPEF8755-2930, 21(3), 803-832. 10.1193/1.1979500