Development of computing environment for the seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete frames by using simplified nonlinear models

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1309-1329

  Dolsek, Matjaz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Eurocode; Extended incremental dynamic analysis; Performance based earthquake engineering; Reinforced concrete frames; Software tool

Indexed keywords

EUROCODES; EXTENDED INCREMENTAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE-BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMES; SOFTWARE TOOL;

CIVIL ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CONCRETE BUILDINGS; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; EARTHQUAKES; ENGINEERING GEOLOGY; HINGES; MODEL STRUCTURES; NONLINEAR ANALYSIS; PLASTICS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC WAVES; STEEL BEAMS AND GIRDERS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ROTATION;

BUILDING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NONLINEARITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC HAZARD; SEISMIC MOMENT; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

BANGLADESH; MATLAB;

EID: 78650076244     PISSN: 1570761X     EISSN: 15731456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-010-9184-8     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ambraseys N, Smith P, Bernardi R, Rinaldis D, Cotton F, Berge-Thierry C (2000) Dissemination of european strong-motion data. In: CD-ROM collection. European Council, Environment and Climate Research Programme.
2. Arede A (1997) Seismic assessment of reinforced concrete frame structures with a new flexibility based element. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Porto.
3. ATC (1996) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings (ATC-40). Applied Technology Council, California.
4. Celarec D, Dolšek M, Vamvatsikos D (2009) Estimation of the seismic risk of RC frames with consideration of capacity degradation over time. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering, COMPDYN 2009, CD 217, Rodes.
5. CEN (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance-Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, EN 1998-1. European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels.
6. CEN (2004) Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures-Part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings, EN 1992-1-1. European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels.
7. CEN (2005) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings, Stage 64. European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels.
8. CSI (2006) PERFORM-3D user guide, Version 4. Computers & Structures Inc, Berkeley.
9. CSI (2008) SAP 2000 User Manual, Version 12. Computers & Structures Inc, Berkeley.
10. Deierlein G (2004) Overview of a comprehensive framework for earthquake performance assessment. In: Fajfar P, Krawinkler H (eds) Proceedings of the international workshop on performance-based seismic design-concepts and implementation, Bled, Slovenia, PEER Report 2004/05: 15-26, Berkeley.
11. Dolšek M (2008) PBEE toolbox User's Manual, Version 1. University of Ljubljana. http://ice4risk. slo-projekt. info/applications. htm.
12. Dolšek M (2008a) PBEE toolbox-examples of application, Version 1. University of Ljubljana. http://ice4risk. slo-projekt. info/applications. htm.
13. Dolšek M, Fajfar P (2001) Mathematical modeling of an infilled RC frame structure based on the results of pseudo-dynamic tests. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31: 1215-1230.
14. Dolsek M (2009) Incremental dynamic analysis with consideration of modeling uncertainties. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38: 805-825.
15. Dolšek M, Fajfar P (2007) Simplified probabilistic seismic performance assessment of plan-asymmetric buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36: 2021-2041.
16. Elnashai AS, Papanikolaou VK, Lee DH (2008) Zeus NL-a system for inelastic analysis of structures, User Manual, Version 1. 8. 7.
17. Elwood KJ, Moehle JP (2008) Dynamic collapse analysis for a reinforced concrete frame sustaining shear and axial failures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37: 991-1012.
18. Fajfar P (2000) A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthq Spectr 16(3): 573-592.
19. Fajfar P, Dolšek M, Marušić D, Stratan A (2006) Pre- and post-test mathematical modelling of a plan-asymmetric reinforced concrete frame building. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35: 1359-1379.
20. Fajfar P, Peruš I (1997) A non-parametric approach to attenuation relations. J Earth Eng 1(2): 319-340.
21. Fardis MN (ed) (1996) Experimental and numerical investigations on the seismic response of RC infilled frames and recommendations for code provisions. ECOEST/PREC 8, Rep. No. 6, LNEC, Lisbon.
22. Fardis MN, Biskins DE (2003) Deformation capacity of RC members, as controlled by flexure or shear. In: Kabeyasawa T, Shiohara H (eds) Performance-based engineering for earthquake resistant reinforced concrete structures: a volume honoring Shunsuke Otani. University of Tokyo, Tokyo.
23. FEMA (1997) NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA publication 273), Washington, DC.
24. Fischinger M (1989) Nonlinear dynamic analysis of reinforced concrete buildings under earthquakes: development of design methodology. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana.
25. Fischinger M, Kramar M, Isaković T (2008) Cyclic response of slender RC columns typical of precast industrial buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 6: 519-534.
26. Franchin P, Lupoi A, Pinto PE, Schotanus MIJ (2003) Seismic fragility of reinforced concrete structures using a response surface approach. J Earth Eng 7(Sp. Is. 1): 45-77.
27. Grabec I, Sachse W (1997) Synergetics of measurement, prediction and control. Springer, Berlin.
28. Haselton CB (2006) Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete moment frame buildings. Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University.
29. Ibarra LF, Medina RA, Krawinkler H (2005) Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34(12): 1489-1511.
30. MathWorks (2007) MATLAB the Language of Technical Computing. http://www. mathworks. com/.
31. McKenna F, Fenves GL, Scott MH (2000). Open system for earthquake engineering simulation. Univ. of California, Berkeley. http://opensees. berkeley. edu/.
32. Mergos PE, Kappos AJ (2008) A distributed shear and flexural flexibility model with shear-flexure interaction for R/C members subjected to seismic loading. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37: 1349-1370.
33. MIDAS (2008) Pushover analysis of RC structures as per EC8: 2004, MidasGen Version 7. 4. 1. MIDAS Information Technologies Co, Ltd, Korea.
34. Negro P, Colombo A (1997) Irregularities induced by non-structural masonry panels in framed buildings. Eng Struct 19(7): 576-585.
35. Negro P, Pinto AV, Verzeletti G, Magonette GE (1996) PsD test on four-story R/C building designed according to Eurocodes. J Struct Eng 122(12): 1409-1417.
36. Negro P, Verzeletti G (1996) Effect of infills on the global behaviour of R/C frames: energy considerations from pseudo-dynamic tests. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25: 753-773.
37. Peruš I, Fajfar P, Grabec I (1994) Prediction of the seismic capacity of RC structural walls by non-parametric multidimensional regression. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 23: 1139-1155.
38. Peruš I, Poljanšek K, Fajfar P (2006) Flexural deformation capacity of rectangular RC columns determined by the CAE method. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35: 1453-1470.
39. Pinto AV, Negro P, Pegon P, Arede A (1995) Analysis of the 4 storey R/C building to be tested in the ELSA-reaction wall facility. In: Proceedings of the 10th European conference on earthquake engineering 1995. Balkema, Roterdam.
40. Poljanšek K, Peruš I, Fajfar P (2009) Hysteretic energy dissipation capacity and the cyclic to monotonic drift ratio for rectangular RC columns in flexure. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38: 907-928.
41. Rozman M, Fajfar P (2009) Seismic response of a RC frame building designed according to old and modern practices. Bull Earthq Eng 7: 779-799.
42. Schellenberg A, Yang T (2004) OpenSees navigator. University of California, Berkeley.
43. Scott MH, Kidarsa A, Higgins C (2008) Development of bridge rating applications using OpenSees and Tcl. J Comput Civ Eng 22(4): 264-271.
44. SEISMOSOFT (2007) SeismoStruct Version 4. SeismoSoft Ltd, Messina, Italy.
45. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2002) Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31: 491-514.
46. Vamvatsikos D, Fragiadakis M (2010) Incremental dynamic analysis for estimating seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 39: 683-703.
47. Zevnik J (2007) Seismic vulnerability of reinforced concrete viaducts with hollow piers. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.