A 'Partnership in Teaching Excellence': Ways in which one school-university partnership has fostered teacher development

Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 99-110

  Allen, Jeanne Maree ^a   Howells, Kerry ^a   Radford, Ruth ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^b Tasmanian Department of Education   (Australia)

Author keywords

pre service teacher education; scholarship program; school university partnership; theory practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874154296     PISSN: 1359866X     EISSN: 14692945     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1359866X.2012.753988     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Allen, J.M. 2009. Valuing practice over theory: How beginning teachers re-orient their practice in the transition from the university to the workplace. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25: 647-654.
2. Allen, J.M. 2011. Stakeholders' perspectives of the nature and role of assessment during practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27: 742-750.
3. Allen, J.M. and Peach, D. 2007. Exploring connections between the in-field and on-campus components of a preservice teacher education program: A student perspective. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 8: 23-36.
4. Australian Government Department of Education Science and Training. 2007. Tasmanian professional teaching standards framework, Hobart, Tasmania: Author.
5. Baumfield, V. and Butterworth, M. 2007. Creating and translating knowledge about teaching and learning in collaborative school-university research partnerships: An analysis of what is exchanged in the partnerships, by whom and how. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(4): 411-427.
6. Bloomfield, D. 2009. Working within and against neoliberal accreditation agendas: Opportunities for professional experience. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 37: 27-44.
7. Collinson, V. and Cook, T.F. 2007. Organizational learning: Improving learning, teaching, and leading in school systems, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Darling-Hammond, L. 2006. Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Darling-Hammond, L., Pacheco, A., Michelli, N., LePage, P., Hammerness, K. and Youngs, with P. 2005. "Implementing curriculum renewal in teacher education: Managing organizational and policy change". In Preparing teachers for a changing world, Edited by: Darling-Hammond, L. and Bransford, J.D. 442-479. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
10. Driscoll, A., Benson, N. and Livneh, C. 1994. University/school district collaboration in teacher education: Outcomes and insights. Teacher Education Quarterly, 21(3): 59-68.
11. Freestone, M. 2009. 2009 review of partnerships in teaching excellence, Hobart, Tasmania: Tasmanian Department of Education.
12. Freestone, M. 2011. 2011 review of partnerships in teaching excellence [draft], Hobart, Tasmania: Tasmanian Department of Education.
13. Ganser, T. 1996. The cooperating teacher role. The Teacher Educator, 31: 283-291.
14. Hartsuyker, L. 2007. Top of the class: Report on the inquiry into teacher education. (House of Representatives Standing Committee on Education and Vocational Training), Canberra, ACT: The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.
15. Imig, D.G. and Imig, S.R. 2006. What do beginning teachers need to know? An essay. Journal of Teacher Education, 57: 286-291.
16. James, M. and Worrall, N. 2000. Building a reflective community: development through collaboration between a higher education institution and one school over 10 years. Educational Action Research, 8: 93-114.
17. Jensen, B. and Reichl, J. 2011. Better teacher appraisal and feedback: Improving performance, Melbourne, Vic: Grattan Institute.
18. McKinsey & Company. (2007). How the world's best-performing school systems come out on top. http://www.mckinsey.com/climateservice/socialsector/resources/pdf/Worlds_School_Systems_Final.pdf (http://www.mckinsey.com/climateservice/socialsector/resources/pdf/Worlds_School_Systems_Final.pdf) (Accessed: 15 October 2007).
19. Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, 2nd, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2005. Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers, Paris: Author.
21. Owen, S., Kos, J. and McKenzie, P. 2008. Teacher workforce date and planning processes in Australia, Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.
22. j, Patrick, C.-, Peach, D. and Pocknee, C. 2008. The WIL [Work Integrated Learning] report: A national scoping study [Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC) Final Report], Brisbane, Qld: Queensland University of Technology.
23. Phillips, B. 2008. Teacher education partnerships; Teacher education options: A discussion paper, Tasmanian Department of Education.
24. Skilbeck, M. and Connell, H. 2004. Teachers for the future: The changing nature of society and related issues for the teaching workforce, Canberra, ACT: MCEETYA.
25. Skilbeck, M. and Connell, H. 2005. Submission to the standing committee on education and vocational training inquiry into teacher education, Canberra, ACT: MCEETYA.
26. Smith, R.A. 2000. The future of teacher education: Principles and prospects. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 28: 7-28.
27. Trent, J. and Lim, J. 2010. Teacher identity construction in school-university partnerships: Discourse and practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26: 1609-1618.
28. Yayli, D. 2008. Theory-practice dichotomy in inquiry: Meanings and preservice teacher-mentor teacher tension in Turkish literacy classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24: 889-900.
29. Zeichner, K.M. 2006. Reflections of a university-based teacher educator on the future of college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57: 326-340.