The minimum transition hypothesis for intermittent hierarchical motor control

Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue FEB, 2013, Pages

  Karniel, Amir ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

Blind source separation; Intermittent control; Motor control; Muscle synergies; Spinal cord

Indexed keywords

BRAIN MACHINE INTERFACE; CONTINUOUS CONTROL; CONTROL LAWS; CONTROL SIGNAL; CONTROL STRATEGIES; CURRENT MODELS; HUMAN MOTOR CONTROL; INTERMITTENCY; INTERMITTENT CONTROLS; MINIMIZING THE NUMBER OF; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR SYSTEMS; MUSCLE SYNERGIES; NEURAL CONTROL; NEUROSCIENCE LITERATURE; SINGLE NEURAL; SKILL LEARNING; SPINAL CORDS; THEORETICAL MODELS;

BLIND SOURCE SEPARATION; CONTROL THEORY; FORECASTING; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION; MUSCLE;

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; LEARNING; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR NERVE CONDUCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; NONHUMAN; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PREDICTION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84874122800     PISSN: 16625188     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2013.00012     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. O.G. Meijer, Making Things Happen: An Introduction to the History of Movement Science. in: M.L. Latash, and V.M. Zatsiorsky, (Eds.), Classics in Movement Science, Human Kinetics, 2001.
2. G. Whitteridge, (Ed.), De Motu Locali Animalium [on animal movement] (I627). WILLIAM HARVEY. Edited, translated and introduced by Gweneth Whitteridge., Cambridge University Press, 1959.
3. A. Karniel, Open questions in computational motor control Journal of Integrative Neuroscience 10 (2011) 385-411.
4. J. Doeringer, and N. Hogan, Intermittency in preplanned elbow movements persists in the absence of visual feedback. Journal of neurophysiology 80 (1998) 1787-1799.
5. A. Fishbach, S.A. Roy, C. Bastianen, L.E. Miller, and J.C. Houk, Kinematic properties of on line error corrections in the monkey. Experimental Brain Research 164 (2005) 442-457.
6. S. Hanneton, A. Berthoz, J. Droulez, and J.J.E. Slotine, Does the brain use sliding variables for the control of movements? Biological Cybernetics 77 (1997) 381-393.
7. F. Navas, and L. Stark, Sampling or Intermittency in Hand Control System Dynamics. Biophysical Journal 8 (1968) 252-&.
8. P.D. Neilson, M.D. Neilson, and N.J. O'Dwyer, Internal models and intermittency: A theoretical account of human tracking behavior. Biological Cybernetics 58 (1988) 101-112.
9. V. Squeri, L. Masia, M. Casadio, P. Morasso, and E. Vergaro, Force-Field Compensation in a Manual Tracking Task. PLoS ONE 5 (2010) e11189.
10. J.P. Welsh, and R. Llinas, Some organizing principles for the control of movement based on olivocerebellar physiology. Prog Brain Res 114 (1997) 449-61.
11. P.J. Gawthrop, and L. Wang, Intermittent predictive control of an inverted pendulum. Control Engineering Practice 14 (2006) 1347-1356.
12. I.D. Loram, H. Gollee, M. Lakie, and P.J. Gawthrop, Human control of an inverted pendulum: is continuous control necessary? Is intermittent control effective? Is intermittent control physiological? J Physiol 589 (2011) 307-24.
13. S. Ben-Itzhak, and A. Karniel, Minimum acceleration criterion with constraints implies bangbang control as an underlying principle for optimal trajectories of arm reaching movements. Neural Computation 20 (2008) 779-812.
14. R.T. Bye, and P.D. Neilson, The BUMP model of response planning: Variable horizon predictive control accounts for the speed-accuracy tradeoffs and velocity profiles of aimed movement. Human Movement Science 27 (2008) 771-798.
15. R.T. Bye, and P.D. Neilson, The BUMP model of response planning: Intermittent predictive control accounts for 10 Hz physiological tremor Human Movement Science 29 (2010) 713-736.
16. P.J. Gawthrop, and L. Wang, Event-driven intermittent control. International Journal of Control 82 (2009) 2235-2248.
17. A. Karniel, and F.A. Mussa-Ivaldi, Sequence, time, or state representation: how does the motor control system adapt to variable environments? Biological Cybernetics 89 (2003) 10-21.
18. R. Shadmehr, and S.P. Wise, The Computational Neurobiology of Reaching and Pointing: A Foundation for Motor Learning, MIT Press, 2005.
19. E. Todorov, and M.I. Jordan, Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nature neuroscience 5 (2002) 1226-35.
20. A. Karniel, F.A. Mussa-Ivaldi, A. d'Avella, and E. Bizzi, A minimum transition hypothesis to account for motor synergies, The twelve annual neural control of movement meeting, Naples, Florida, 2002.
21. M. Berniker, A. Jarc, E. Bizzi, and M.C. Tresch, Simplified and effective motor control based on muscle synergies to exploit musculoskeletal dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106 (2009) 7601-6.
22. V.C. Cheung, A. d'Avella, and E. Bizzi, Adjustments of motor pattern for load compensation via modulated activations of muscle synergies during natural behaviors. J Neurophysiol 101 (2009) 1235-57.
23. A. d'Avella, and E. Bizzi, Shared and specific muscle synergies in natural motor behaviors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102 (2005) 3076-81.
24. D. Domkin, J. Laczko, S. Jaric, H. Johansson, and M.L. Latash, Structure of joint variability in bimanual pointing tasks. Experimental Brain Research 143 (2002) 11-23.
25. S. Grossberg, and R.W. Paine, A neural model of cortico-cerebellar interactions during attentive imitation and predictive learning of sequential handwriting movements. Neural Networks 13 (2000) 999-1046.
26. N. Kang, M. Shinohara, V. Zatsiorsky, and M. Latash, Learning multi-finger synergies: an uncontrolled manifold analysis. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH 157 (2004) 336-350.
27. F.A. Mussa-Ivaldi, and S.A. Solla, Neural primitives for motion control. Ieee Journal of Oceanic Engineering 29 (2004) 640-650.
28. S.A. Overduin, A. d'Avella, J. Roh, and E. Bizzi, Modulation of muscle synergy recruitment in primate grasping. J Neurosci 28 (2008) 880-92.
29. P. Saltiel, K. Wyler-Duda, A. D'Avella, M.C. Tresch, and E. Bizzi, Muscle synergies encoded within the spinal cord: evidence from focal intraspinal NMDA iontophoresis in the frog. J Neurophysiol 85 (2001) 605-19.
30. R. Sosnik, T. Flash, B. Hauptmann, and A. Karni, The acquisition and implementation of the smoothness maximization motion strategy is dependent on spatial accuracy demands. Experimental Brain Research 176 (2007) 311-331.
31. M.C. Tresch, P. Saltiel, and E. Bizzi, The construction of movement by the spinal cord. Nature neuroscience 2 (1999) 162-7.
32. S.F. Giszter, E. Loeb, F.A. Mussa-Ivaldi, and E. Bizzi, Repeatable spatial maps of a few force and joint torque patterns elicited by microstimulation applied throughout the lumbar spinal cord of the spinal frog. Human Movement Science 19 (2000) 597-626.
33. V.C. Cheung, A. d'Avella, M.C. Tresch, and E. Bizzi, Central and sensory contributions to the activation and organization of muscle synergies during natural motor behaviors. J Neurosci 25 (2005) 6419-34.
34. A. d'Avella, P. Saltiel, and E. Bizzi, Combinations of muscle synergies in the construction of a natural motor behavior. Nature neuroscience 6 (2003) 300-8.
35. W.J. Kargo, and S.F. Giszter, Individual premotor drive pulses, not time-varying synergies, are the units of adjustment for limb trajectories constructed in spinal cord. Journal of Neuroscience 28 (2008) 2409-2425.
36. W. Abend, E. Bizzi, and P. Morasso, Human arm trajectory formation. Brain 105 (1982) 331-48.
37. T. Flash, and N. Hogan, The coordination of arm movements: An experimentally confirmed mathematical model. Journal of Neuroscience 5 (1985) 1688-1703.
38. C.M. Harris, and D.M. Wolpert, Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394 (1998) 780-784.
39. Y. Uno, M. Kawato, and R. Suzuki, Formation and Control of Optimal Trajectory in Human Multijoint Arm Movement-Minimum Torque-Change Model. Biological Cybernetics 61 (1989) 89-101.
40. J.B. Dingwell, C.D. Mah, and F.A. Mussa-Ivaldi, Experimentally confirmed mathematical model for human control of a non-rigid object. Journal of Neurophysiology 91 (2004) 1158-1170.
41. M. Svinin, I. Goncharenko, Z.W. Luo, and S. Hosoe, Reaching movements in dynamic environments: How do we move flexible objects? IEEE Transactions on Robotics 22 (2006). 724-739.
42. M. Svinin, Y. Masui, Z.W. Luo, and S. Hosoe, On the dynamic version of the minimum hand jerk criterion. Journal of Robotic Systems 22 (2005) 661-676.
43. R. Leib, and A. Karniel, Minimum acceleration with constraints of center of mass: a unified model for arm movements and object manipulation. Journal of Neurophysiology 108 (2012). 1646-1655.
44. Y. Loewenstein, S. Mahon, P. Chadderton, K. Kitamura, H. Sompolinsky, Y. Yarom, and M.H. Hausser, Bistability of cerebellar Purkinje cells modulated by sensory stimulation. Nature Neuroscience 8 (2005) 202-211.
45. M.M. Yartsev, R. Givon-Mayo, M. Maller, and O. Donchin, Pausing purkinje cells in the cerebellum of the awake cat. Front Syst Neurosci 3 (2009) 2.
46. E. Todorov, W. Li, and X. Pan, From task parameters to motor synergies: A hierarchical framework for approximately-optimal control of redundant manipulators. J Robot Syst 22 (2005) 691-710.
47. A. Karniel, Computational Motor Control. in: M.D. Binder, N. Hirokawa, and U. Windhorst, (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009, pp. 832-837.
48. G.N. Nair, F. Fagnani, S. Zampieri, and R.J. Evans, Feedback Control Under Data Rate Constraints: An Overview. Proceedings of the Ieee 95 (2007) 108-137.