Minimum acceleration with constraints of center of mass: A unified model for arm movements and object manipulation

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 108, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1646-1655

  Leib, Raz ^a   Karniel, Amir ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

Optimal control; Pontryagin's minimum principle; Reaching movement

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MASS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MATHEMATICAL VARIABLE; MINIMUM ACCELERATION WITH CONSTRAINTS FOR THE CENTER OF MASS MODEL; MOTOR CONTROL; OBJECT MANIPULATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACCELERATION; ADULT; ARM; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOVEMENT;

EID: 84866414205     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00224.2012     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abend W, Bizzi E, Morasso P. Human arm trajectory formation. Brain 105: 331-348, 1982.
2. Apostol TM. Calculus: One-Variable Calculus, With an Introduction to Linear Algebra. Waltham, MA: Blaisdell, 1967.
3. Arthurs KL, Andrews DM. Upper extremity soft and rigid tissue mass prediction using segment anthropometric measures and DXA. J Biomech 42: 389-394, 2009.
4. Ben-Itzhak S, Karniel A. Minimum acceleration criterion with constraints implies bang-bang control as an underlying principle for optimal trajectories of arm reaching movements. Neural Comput 20: 779-812, 2008.
5. Berret B, Chiovetto E, Nori F, Pozzo T. Evidence for composite cost functions in arm movement planning: an inverse optimal control approach. PLoS Comput Biol 7: e1002183, 2011.
6. Botzer L, Karniel A. A simple and accurate onset detection method for a measured bell-shaped speed profile. Front Neurosci 3: 61, 2009.
7. Boyce W, DiPrima R. Introduction to Differential Equations. New York: Wiley, 1970.
8. Dingwell JB, Mah CD, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Experimentally confirmed mathematical model for human control of a non-rigid object. J Neurophysiol 91: 1158-1170, 2004.
9. Dingwell JB, Mah CD, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Manipulating objects with internal degrees of freedom: evidence for model-based control. J Neurophysiol 88: 222-235, 2002.
10. Flash T, Hogan N. The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci 5: 1688-1703, 1985.
11. Fourre B, Isableu B, Bernardin D, Gueguen M, Giraudet G, Vuillerme N, Pagano C, Amorim MA. The role of body centre of mass on haptic subjective vertical. Neurosci Lett 465: 230-234, 2009.
12. Friedenberg J, Liby B. Perception of two-body center of mass. Percept Psychophys 64: 531-539, 2002.
13. Friedman M. the use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. J Am Stat Assoc 32: 675-701, 1937.
14. Gawthrop P, Loram I, Lakie M, Gollee H. Intermittent control: a computational theory of human control. Biol Cybern 104: 31-51, 2011.
15. Georgopoulos A, Kalaska J, Caminiti R, Massey J. On the relations between the direction of two-dimensional arm movements and cell discharge in primate motor cortex. J Neurosci 2: 1527-1537, 1982.
16. Gordon KE, Ferris DP, Kuo AD. Metabolic and mechanical energy costs of reducing vertical center of mass movement during gait. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90: 136-144, 2009.
17. Hirsch J, Mjolsness E. A center-of-mass computation describes the precision of random dot displacement discrimination. Vision Res 32: 335-346, 1992.
18. Hogan N. An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements. J Neurosci 4: 2745-2754, 1984.
19. Huegel JC, Lynch AJ, O'Malley MK. Validation of a smooth movement model for a human reaching task. In: ICORR 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2009, p. 799-804.
20. Imamizu H, Miyauchi S, Tamada T, Sasaki Y, Takino R, Putz B, Yoshioka T, Kawato M. Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool. Nature 403: 192-195, 2000.
21. Izawa J, Rane T, Donchin O, Shadmehr R. Motor adaptation as a process of reoptimization. J Neurosci 28: 2883-2891, 2008.
22. Kawato M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9: 718-727, 1999.
23. Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat Neurosci 2: 1026-1031, 1999.
24. Loewenstein Y, Mahon S, Chadderton P, Kitamura K, Sompolinsky H, Yarom Y, Hausser M. Bistability of cerebellar Purkinje cells modulated by sensory stimulation. Nat Neurosci 8: 202-211, 2005.
25. Lukos J, Ansuini C, Santello M. Choice of contact points during multidigit grasping: effect of predictability of object center of mass location. J Neurosci 27: 3894-3903, 2007.
26. Morasso P. Spatial control of arm movements. Exp Brain Res 42: 223-227, 1981.
27. Nowak D, Topka H, Timmann D, Boecker H, Hermsdörfer J. The role of the cerebellum for predictive control of grasping. Cerebellum 6: 7-17, 2007.
28. Pasalar S, Roitman AV, Durfee WK, Ebner TJ. Force field effects on cerebellar Purkinje cell discharge with implications for internal models. Nat Neurosci 9: 1404-1411, 2006.
29. Salimi I, Frazier W, Reilmann R, Gordon AM. Selective use of visual information signaling objects' center of mass for anticipatory control of manipulative fingertip forces. Exp Brain Res 150: 9-18, 2003.
30. Scholz JP, Schöner G. The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task. Exp Brain Res 126: 289-306, 1999.
31. Suzuki M, Yamazaki Y, Mizuno N, Matsunami K. Trajectory formation of the center-of-mass of the arm during reaching movements. Neuroscience 76: 597-610, 1997.
32. Svinin M, Goncharenko I, Zhi-Wei L, Hosoe S. Reaching movements in dynamic environments: how do we move flexible objects? IEEE Trans Robot 22: 724-739, 2006.
33. Svinin M, Masui Y, Luo ZW, Hosoe S. On the dynamic version of the minimum hand jerk criterion. J Robot Syst 22: 661-676, 2005.
34. Uno Y, Kawato M, Suzuki R. Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement. Biol Cybern 61: 89-101, 1989.
35. van de Langenberg R, Kingma I, Beek P. Perception of limb orientation in the vertical plane depends on center of mass rather than inertial eigenvectors. Exp Brain Res 180: 595-607, 2007.
36. Yazdani M, Gamble G, Henderson G, Hecht-Nielsen R. A simple control policy for achieving minimum jerk trajectories. Neural Netw 27: 74-80, 2012.