Facet violation with the placement of percutaneous pedicle screws

Spine

Volumn 36, Issue 26, 2011, Pages

  Patel, Rakesh D ^a   Graziano, Gregory P ^a   Vanderhave, Kelly L ^a   Patel, Alpesh A ^b   Gerling, Michael C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

facet violation; lumbar spine; pedicle screw; percutaneous screw

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CADAVER; FACET VIOLATION; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; LUMBAR SPINE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NERVE COMPRESSION; NERVE INJURY; PEDICLE SCREW; PERCUTANEOUS PEDICLE SCREW; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK REDUCTION; SPINE INJURY; SPINE INSTABILITY; SPINE SURGERY;

BONE SCREWS; CADAVER; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SACRUM; ZYGAPOPHYSEAL JOINT;

EID: 83255192144     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318221a800     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Odgers CJ IV , Vaccaro AR , Pollack ME , et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement with the assistance of lateral plain radiography. J Spinal Disord 1996 ; 9 : 334-8. (Pubitemid 26299039)
2. Park Y , Ha JW. Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007 ; 32 : 537-43. (Pubitemid 46398919)
3. Kim DY , Lee SH , Chung SK , et al. Comparison of multifi dus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fi xation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005 ; 30 : 123-9.
4. Ringel F , Stoffel M , Stuer C , et al. Minimally invasive transmuscular pedicle screw fi xation of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Neurosurgery 2006 ; 59 :ON S361 - 6 ; discussion ONS366-7.
5. Chung KJ , Suh SW , Swapnil K , et al. Facet joint violation during pedicle screw insertion: a cadaveric study of the adult lumbosacral spine comparing the two pedicle screw insertion techniques. Int Orthop 2007 ; 31 : 653-6. (Pubitemid 47573369)
6. Heim SE. Transpedicle instrumentation in the degenerative spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997 : 97-110. (Pubitemid 27172055)
7. Vaccaro AR , Garfi SR. Internal fi xation (pedicle screw fi xation) for fusions of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995 ; 20 : 157S - 65S.
8. Weinstein JN , Rydevik BL , Rauschning W. Anatomic and technical considerations of pedicle screw fi xation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992 Nov ; 34-46.
9. West JL III , Ogilvie JW , Bradford DS. Complications of the variable screw plate pedicle screw fi xation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1991 ; 16 : 576-9.
10. Magerl F. External skeletal fi xation of the lower thoracic and the lumbar spine. In: Uhthoff HK , ed. Current Concepts of External Fixation of Fractures. New York, NY : Springer-Verlag ; 1982 : 353-66.
11. Kim DH , Albert TJ. Update on use of instrumentation in lumbar spine disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2002 ; 16 : 123-40.
12. Peng CW , Yue WM , Poh SY , et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009 ; 34 : 1385-9.
13. Shunwu F , Xing Z , Fengdong Z , et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010 ; 35 : 1615-20.
14. Lehmann W , Ushmaev A , Ruecker A , et al. Comparison of open versus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion in a sheep model. Eur Spine J 2008 ; 17 : 857-63.