Ensemble of surrogates for dual response surface modeling in robust parameter design

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 173-197

  Zhou, Xiaojian ^a   Ma, Yizhong ^a   Tu, Yiliu ^b   Feng, Ying ^a  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

ensemble; kriging; nonparametric regression; radial basis function; robust design; support vector regression; surrogate

Indexed keywords

ENSEMBLE; KRIGING; NON-PARAMETRIC REGRESSION; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTIONS; ROBUST DESIGNS; SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION (SVR); SURROGATE;

INTERPOLATION; OPTIMIZATION; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 84874108748     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: 10991638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.1298     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Taguchi G,. Introduction to quality engineering. UNIPBUK/Krans International: White Plains, New York, 1986.
2. Taguchi G,. Systems of experimental design: engineering methods to optimize quality and minimize cost. UNIPBUK/Krans International: White Plains, New York, 1987.
3. Myers RH, Khuri AI, Vining G,. Response surface alternatives to the taguchi robust parameter design approach. The American Statistician 1992; 46: 131-139.
4. Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM,. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments; third edition. John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2009.
5. Del Castillo E,. Process optimization: a statistical approach. Springer: New York, 2007.
6. Vining GG, Myers RH,. Combining taguchi and response surface philosophies: a dual response approach. Journal of Quality Technology 1990; 22: 38-45.
7. Del Castillo E, Montgomery DC,. A nonlinear programming solution to the dual response problem. Journal of Quality Technology 1993; 25: 199-204.
8. Lin DKJ, Tu W,. Dual response surface optimization. Journal of Quality Technology 1995; 27: 34-39.
9. Copeland KAF, Nelson PR,. Dual response optimization via direct function minimization. Journal of Quality Technology 1996; 28: 331-336.
10. Ames AE, Mattucci N, Macdonald S, Szonyi G, Hawkins DM,. Quality loss functions for optimization across multiple response surfaces. Journal of Quality Technology 1997; 29: 339-346.
11. Antony J,. Multi-response optimization in industrial experiments using taguchis quality loss function and principal component analysis. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2000; 16 (1): 3-8.
12. Kim K, Lin DKJ,. Dual response surface optimization: A fuzzy modeling approach. Journal of Quality Technology 1998; 30: 1-10.
13. Tong L, Su C,. Optimizing multi-response problems in the taguchi method by fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 1997; 13 (1): 25-34.
14. Kumar P, Barua PB, Gaindhar JL,. Quality optimization (multi-characteristics) through taguchis technique and utility concept. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2000; 16 (6): 475-485.
15. Tang LC, Xu K,. Unified approach for dual response surface optimization. Journal of Quality Technology 2002; 34: 437-447.
16. Kim YJ, Cho BR,. Development of prioritybased robust design. Quality Engineering 2002; 14: 355-363.
17. Koksoy O, Doganaksoy N,. Joint optimization of mean and standard deviation in response surface experimentation. Journal of Quality Technology 2003; 35 (3): 239-252.
18. Lam SW, Tang LC,. A hraphical spproach to thedual response robust design approach. In Reliability and maintainability symposium. Proceedings. Annual, 2005; 200-206.
19. Vining GG, Bohn L,. Response surfaces for the mean and variance using a nonparametric approach. Journal of Quality Technology 1998; 30: 282-291.
20. Anderson-Cook CM, Prewitt K,. Some Guidelines For Using Nonparametric Methods For Modeling Data From Response Surface Designs. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 2005; 4 (1): 106-119.
21. Pickle SM, Robinson TJ, Birch JB, Anderson-Cook CM,. A semi-parametric approach to robust parameter design. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2008; 138: 114-131.
22. Koksoy O, Yalcinoz T,. A Hopfield neural network approach to the dual response problem. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2005; 21: 595-603.
23. Shaibu AB, Cho BR,. Another view of dual response surface modeling and optimization in robust parameter design. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2009; 41: 631-641.
24. Owen A,. Orthogonal arrays for computer experiments, integration, and visualization. Statistica Sinica 1992; 2: 439-452.
25. Fang KT, Lin DKJ, Winker P, Zhang Y,. Orthogonal arrays for computer experiments, integration, and visualization. Technometrics 2000; 39 (3): 237-248.
26. McKay MD, Bechman RJ, Conover WJ,. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 1979; 21 (2): 239-245.
27. Matsuura S, Suzuki H, Iida T, Kurec H, Moric H,. Robust Parameter Design Using a Supersaturated Design for a Response Surface Model. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2011; 27 (4): 541-554.
28. Emmett M, Goosb P, Stillmand EC,. A Weighted Prediction-based Selection Criterion for Response Surface Designs. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2011; 27 (5): 719-729.
29. Johnsona RT,., Montgomery DC,. Designing Experiments for Nonlinear Models-An Introduction. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2010; 26 (5): 431-441.
30. Box GEP, Draper NR,. Expirical model building and response surface. John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1987.
31. Myers RH,. Classical and Modern Regression with Applications. PWS-Kent: Boston, MA, 1990.
32. Wan W, Birch JB,. A Semiparametric Technique for the Multi-response Optimization Problem. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2011; 27 (1): 47-59.
33. Hardle W, Muller M, Sperlich S, Werwatz A,. Nonparametric and Semiparametric Models. Springer: Berlin, 2004
34. Einsporn R, Birch JB,. Model robust regression: using parametric regression to improve parametric regression analyses. Technique Report 93-5, Department of Statistics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blackburg, VA, 1993.
35. Mays J, Birch JB, Einsporn R,. An overview of model-robust regression. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 2000; 66: 79-100.
36. Meckesheimer M, Barton RR, Simpson TW, Booker AJ,. Computationally inexpensive metamodel assessment strategies. AIAA Journal 2002; 40 (10): 205-2060.
37. Meckesheimer M, Barton RR, Simpson TW, Limayemn F, Yannou B,. Metamodeling of combined discrete/continuous responses. AIAA Journal 2001; 39 (10): 1950-1959.
38. Hardy RL,. Multiquadratic equations of topography and other irregular surfaces. Journal of Geophysical Research 1971; 76: 1905-1915.
39. Powell MJD,. Radial basis functions for multivariable interpolation: a review. In Proceedings of the IMA Conference on Algorithms for the Approximation of Functions and Data, Mason JC, Cox MG, (eds). Oxford University Press: London, 1987; 143-167.
40. McDonald DB, Grantham WJ, Tabor WL, Murphy MJ,. Response surface model development for global/local optimization using radial basis functions. In The 8th AIAA Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Long Beach, CA, 2000.
41. Sacks J, Schiller SB, Welch WJ,. Designs for Computer Experiments. Technometrics 1989; 31 (1): 41-47.
42. Sacks J, Welch WJ, Mitchell TJ, Wynn HP,. Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments. Statistical Science 1989; 4 (4): 409-435.
43. Smola AJ, Schlkopf B,. A tutorial on support vector regression. Statistics and Computing 2004; 14 (3): 199-222.
44. Goel T, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Queipo NV,. Ensemble of surrogates. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 2007; 33: 199-216.
45. Ding R, Lin D, Wei D,. Dual response surface optimization: A weighted MSE approach. Quality Engineering 2004; 16 (3): 377-385.
46. Jeong I-J, Kimb K-J, Lin DKJ,. Bayesian Analysis for Weighted Mean-squared Error in Dual Response Surface Optimization. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2010; 26 (5): 417-730.
47. Acar E, Rais-Rohani M,. Ensemble of metamodels with optimized weight factors. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 2009; 37: 279-294.
48. Viana FAC, Haftka RT, Steffen V, Jr,. Multiple surrogate: how crossvalidation errors can help us to obtain the best predictor. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 2009; 39: 439-457.
49. Bishop CM,. Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press: New York, 1995.
50. Zerpa L, Queipo NV, Pintos S, Salager J,. An optimization methodology of alkalinesurfactant-polymer flooding processes using field scale numerical simulation and multiple surrogates. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 2005; 47: 197-208.
51. Zhou XJ, Ma YZ, Li XF,. Ensemble of surrogates with recursive arithmetic average. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s00158-011-0655-6
52. Ueberhuber CW,. Numerical computation 2: methods, software and analysis. Springer: New York, 1997.
53. Lophaven SN, Nielsen HB, Sondergaard J,. DACE: A Matlab kriging toolbox, version 2.0. IMM Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, 2002.