Computationally inexpensive metamodel assessment strategies

AIAA Journal

Volumn 40, Issue 10, 2002, Pages 2053-2060

  Meckesheimer, Martin ^a,c   Booker, Andrew J ^a   Barton, Russell R ^b   Simpson, Timothy W ^b,d  

^a BOEING COMPANY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Applied Statistics Group   (United States)

^d Departments of Mechanical and Nuclear and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; OPTIMIZATION; POLYNOMIALS; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

CROOS VALIDATION STRATEGY; FLIGHT MANUAL SIMULATION; INEXPENSIVE APPROXIMATIONS; METAMODEL ASSESSMENT; SIMULATION RESPONSE FUNCTION;

FLIGHT DYNAMICS;

EID: 0036806493     PISSN: 00011452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2514/2.1538     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Meckesheimer, M., Barton, R. R., Simpson, T. W., Limayem, F., and Yannou, B., "Metamodeling of Combined Discrete/Continuous Responses," AIAA Journal, Vol. 39, No. 10, 2001, pp. 1955-1959.
2. Simpson, T. W., Peplinski, J., Koch, P. N., and Allen, J. K., "Metamodels for Computer-Based Engineering Design: Survey and Recommendations," Engineering with Computers, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2001, pp. 129-150.
3. Haftka, R., Scott, E. P., and Cruz, J. R., "Optimization and Experiments: A Survey," Applied Mechanics Review, Vol. 51, No. 7, 1998, pp. 435-448.
4. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J., and Haftka, R. T., "Multidisciplinary Aerospace Design Optimization: Survey of Recent Developments," Structural Optimization, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1997, pp. 1-23.
5. Kleijnen, J. P. C., "A Comment on Blanning's Metamodel for Sensitivity Analysis: The Regression Metamodel in Simulation," Interfaces, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1975, pp. 21-23.
6. Barton, R. R., "Metamodeling: A State of the Art Review," Proceedings of the 1994 Winter Simulation Conference, edited by J. D. Tew, S. Mannivannan, D. A. Sadowski, A. F. Seila, IEEE Publications, Piscataway, NJ, 1994, pp. 237-244.
7. Jin, R., Chen, W., and Simpson, T. W., "Comparative Studies of Metamodeling Techniques Under Multiple Modeling Criteria," AIAA Paper 2000-4801, Sept. 2000.
8. Kleijnen, J. P. C., and Sargent, R. G., "A Methodology for Fitting and Validating Metamodels in Simulation," European Journal of Operations Research, Vol. 120, No. 1, 2000, pp. 14-29.
9. Yesilyurt, S., and Patera, A. T., "Surrogates for Numerical Simulations; Optimization of Eddy-Promoter Heat Exchangers," Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 121, No. 1-4, 1995, pp. 231-257.
10. Yesilyurt, S., Paraschivoiu, M., Otto, J., and Patera, A. T., "Computer-Simulation Response Surfaces: A Bayesian-Validated Approach," 11th International Conference on Computational Methods in Water Resources (CMWR96) edited by A. A. Aldama, Computational Mechanics Publishing, Boston, Vol. 1, 1996, pp. 13-22.
11. Osio, I. G., and Amon, C. H., "An Engineering Design Methodology with Multistage Bayesian Surrogates and Optimal Sampling," Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1996, pp. 189-206.
12. Eubank, R. L., Spline Smoothing and Nonparametric Regression, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1988.
13. Laslett, G. M., "Kriging and Splines: An Empirical Comparison of their Predictive Performance in Some Applications," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 89, No. 426, 1994, pp. 391-400.
14. Mitchell, T. J., and Morris, M. D., "Bayesian Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments: Two Examples," Statistica Sinica, Vol. 2, 1992, pp. 359-379.
15. Myers, R. H., and Montgomery, D. C., Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, Wiley, New York, 1995.
16. Hock, W., and Schittowski, K., Test Examples for Nonlinear Programming Codes, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981.
17. Booker, A. J. "Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments," 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Vol. 1, AIAA, Reston, VA, 1998, pp. 118-128.
18. Sacks, J., Welch, W. J., Mitchell, T. J., and Wynn, H. P. "Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments," Statistical Science, Vol. 4, No. 4, 1989, pp. 409-435.
19. Simpson, T. W., Mauery, T. M., Korte, J. J., and Mistree, F. "Kriging Metamodels for Global Approximation in Simulation-Based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization," AIAA Journal, Vol. 39, No. 12, 2001, pp. 2233-2241.
20. Hardy, R. L., "Multiquadratic Equations of Topography and Other Irregular Surfaces," Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 76, 1971, pp. 1905-1915.
21. Powell, M. J. D., "Radial Basis Functions for Multivariable Interpolation: A Review," Algorithms for Approximation, edited by J. C. Mason and M. G. Cox, Oxford Univ. Press, London, 1987, pp. 105-210.
22. de Boor, C., and Ron, A., "On Multivariate Polynomial Interpolation," Constructive Approximation, Vol. 6, No. 3, 1990, pp. 287-302.
23. Sacks, J., Schiller, S. B., and Welch, W. J., "Designs for Computer Experiments," Technometrics, Vol. 31, No. 1, 1989, pp. 41-47.
24. de Boor, C., and Ron, A., "The Least Solution for the Polynomial Interpolation Problem," Mathematische Zeitschrift, Vol. 210, No. 3, 1992, pp. 347-378.
25. de Boor, C., and Ron, A., "Computational Aspects of Polynomial Interpolation in Several Variables," Mathematics of Computation, Vol. 58, No. 198, 1992, pp. 705-727.
26. Owen, A. B., "Orthogonal Arrays for Computer Experiments, Integration and Visualization," Statistica Sinica, Vol. 2, 1992, pp. 439-452.
27. McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., and Conover, W. J., "A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code," Technometrics, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1979, pp. 239-245.
28. Tang, B., "Orthogonal Array-Based Latin Hypercubes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 88, No. 424, 1993, pp. 1392-1397.
29. Kalagnanam, J. R., and Diwekar, U. M., "An Efficient Sampling Technique for Off-Line Quality Control," Technometrics, Vol. 39, No. 3, 1997, pp. 308-319.
30. Fang, K.-T., Lin, D. K. J., Winker, P., and Zhang, Y., "Uniform Design: Theory and Application," Technometrics, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2000, pp. 437-248.
31. Fang, K. T., and Wang, Y., Number-Theoretic Methods in Statistics, Chapman and Hall, New York, 1994.
32. Simpson, T. W., Lin, D. K. J., and Chen, W., "Sampling Strategies for Computer Experiments: Design and Analysis," International Journal of Reliability and Applications, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2001, pp. 209-240.
33. Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R., An Introduction to the Bootstrap, Chapman and Hall, New York, 1993, p. 149.
34. Meckesheimer, M., "A Framework for Metamodel-Based Design: Subsystem Metamodel Assessment and Implementation Issues," Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA, Dec. 2001; also URL: http://etda.librariespsu.edu/[cited 20 Aug. 2001].