Ensemble of surrogates with recursive arithmetic average

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 651-671

  Zhou, Xiao Jian ^a   Ma, Yi Zhong ^a   Li, Xu Fang ^b  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Design of experiment; Ensemble; Metamodel; Recursive arithmetic average; Surrogate

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATE MODEL; BENCH-MARK PROBLEMS; COMPLEX PRODUCT SYSTEMS; ENGINEERING PROBLEMS; ENSEMBLE; ENSEMBLE MODELS; ENSEMBLE TECHNIQUES; INSURANCE POLICIES; META MODEL; ONE-OF-A-KIND PRODUCTION; PREDICTION ACCURACY; RECURSIVE ARITHMETIC AVERAGE; RECURSIVE PROCESS; SURROGATE; SURROGATE MODEL; TRAINING SETS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DESIGN; EXPERIMENTS; INSURANCE; MODELS;

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS;

EID: 84855812994     PISSN: 1615147X     EISSN: 16151488     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-011-0655-6     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Acar E, Rais-Rohani M (2009) Ensemble of metamodels with optimized weight factors. Struct Multidisc Optim 37:279-294
2. Bishop C (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press, New York
3. Clarke SM, Griebsch JH, Simpson TW (2005) Analysis of support vector regression for approximation of complex engineering analyses. Trans ASME J Mech Des 127(6):1077-1087 (Pubitemid 41709565)
4. Cresssie N (1988) Spatial prediction and ordinary kriging. Math Geol 20(4):405-421
5. De Boor C, Ron A (1990) On multivariate polynomial interpolation. Constr Approx 6:287-302
6. Fang H, Horstemeyer MF (2006) Global response approximation with radial basis functions. Eng Optim 38(4):407-424
7. Forrester AIJ, Keane AJ (2009) Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 45(1-3):50-79
8. Friedman JH (1991) Multivariate adaptive regressive splines. Ann Stat 19(1):1-67
9. Goel T, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Queipo NV (2007) Ensemble of surrogates. Struct Multidisc Optim 33:199-216 (Pubitemid 46198778)
10. Hardy R (1971) Multiquadratic equations of topography and other irregular surfaces. J Geophys Res 76:1905-1915
11. Jin R, Chen W, Simpson TW (2001) Comparative studies of metamodeling techniques under multiple modeling criteria. Struct Multidisc Optim 23(1):1-13 (Pubitemid 34271934)
12. Kleijnen JPC, Sanchez SM, Lucas TW, Cioppa TM (2005) A users guide to the brave new world of designing simulation experiments. INFORMS J Comput 17(3):263-289 (Pubitemid 41342309)
13. Kohavi R (1995) A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: Fourteenth international joint conference on artificial intelligence, pp 1137-1143
14. Langley P, Simon HA (1995) Applications of machine learning and rule induction. Commun ACM 38(11):55-64
15. McDonald D, Grantham W, Tabor W, Murphy M (2000) Response surface model development for global/local optimization using radial basis functions. In: The 8th AIAA symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, Long Beach, CA
16. Meckesheimer M, Barton R, Simpson T, Limayemn F, Yannou B (2001) Metamodeling of combined discrete/continuous responses. AIAA J 39(10):1950-1959 (Pubitemid 33006568)
17. Meckesheimer M, Barton R, Simpson T, Booker A (2002) Computationally inexpensive metamodel assessment strategies. AIAA J 40(10):2053-2060 (Pubitemid 35295818)
18. Papadrakakis M, Lagaros M, Tsompanakis Y (1998) Structural optimization using evolution strategies and neural networks. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 156(1-4):309-333 (Pubitemid 128396491)
19. Perrone M, Cooper L (1993) When networks disagree: ensemble methods for hybrid neural networks. In: Mammone RJ (ed) Artificial neural networks for speech and vision. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 126-142
20. Picard R, Cook R (1984) Cross-validation of regression models. J Am Stat Assoc 79(387):575-583
21. Powell M (1987) Radial basis functions for multivariable interpolation: a review. In: Mason JC, Cox MG (eds) Proceedings of the IMA conference on algorithms for the approximation of functions and data. Oxford University Press, London, pp 143-167
22. Queipo NV, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Goel T, Vaidyanathan R, Tucker PK (2005) Surrogate-based analysis and optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 41:1-28 (Pubitemid 40537187)
23. Sacks J, Schiller SB, Welch WJ (1989a) Designs for computer experiments. Technometrics 31(1):41-47
24. Sacks J, Welch WJ, Mitchell TJ, Wynn HP (1989b) Design and analysis of computer experiments. Stat Sci 4(4):409-435
25. Simpson TW, Toropov V, Balabanov V, Viana FAC (2008) Design and analysis of computer experiments in multidisciplinary design optimization: a review of how far we have come or not. In: 12th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, AIAA20085802, Victoria, BC, Canada
26. Viana FAC, Haftka RT, Steffen V (2009) Multiple surrogate: how cross-validation errors can help us to obtain the best predictor. Struct Multidisc Optim 39:439-457
27. Viana FAC, Gogu C, Haftka RT (2010) Making the most out of surrogate models: tricks of the trade. In: ASME 2010 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, DETC2010-8813, Montreal, Canada
28. Wang GG, Shan S (2007) Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. Trans ASME J Mech Des 129(4):370-381
29. Yang Y (2003) Regression with multiple candidate models: selecting or mixing? Stat Sin 13(5):783-809 (Pubitemid 37155854)
30. Zerpa L, Queipo N, Pintos S, Salager J (2005) An optimization methodology of alkaline-surfactant-polymer flooding processes using field scale numerical simulation and multiple surrogates. J Pet Sci Eng 47:197-208 (Pubitemid 40829362)