A graphical approach to the dual response robust design problems

Proceedings - Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 200-206

  Lam, Shao Wei ^a   Tang, Loon Ching ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Goal attainment; Multiobjective programming; Pareto optimal; Response surface optimization; Robust design

Indexed keywords

GOAL ATTAINMENT; MULTIOBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING; PARETO OPTIMAL; RESPONSE SURFACE OPTIMIZATION; ROBUST DESIGN;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; DECISION MAKING; OPTIMIZATION; PARETO PRINCIPLE; PROBLEM SOLVING; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); COMPUTER GRAPHICS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

EID: 27744494386     PISSN: 0149144X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Taguchi, G. (1986) "Introduction to quality engineering," Asian Productivity Organization 1986, Tokyo.
2. th Asia Pacific Quality Organization Conference, Beijing, China.
3. Pande, P. S, Neuman, R. P. and Cavanagh, R. R. (2000), "The Six Sigma Way," NY, USA: McGraw Hill.
4. Box, G. P., Hunter W. G., and Hunter JS. (1978), "Statistics for experimenters," USA: Wiley.
5. Hwang, C. L., Masud, A. S. M. (1979), "Multiple Objective Decision Making - Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 164, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
6. E. C. Harrington, "The Desirability Function," Industrial Quality Control, 1965, pp 494-498.
7. G. Derringer and R. Suich, "Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables," Journal of Quality Technology, 21(4), 1980, pp. 214-219.
8. E. Del Castillo, D. C. Montgomery and D. R. McCarville, "Modified Desirability Functions for Multiple Response Optimization," Journal of Quality Technology, 28(3), 337-345.
9. K. J. Kim and D. K. J. Lin, "Dual Response Surface Opimization: A Fuzzy Modeling Approach," Journal of Quality Technology, 30(1), pp. 1-10.
10. J. H. Kros and C. M. Mastrangelo, "Comparing Methods for the Multi-response Design Problem," Quality and Reliability International, 17, 2001, pp.323-331.
11. T. C. Koopmans, "Analysis and Production as an Efficient Combination of Activities," Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, Edited by T. C. Koopmans, Yale University Press, New Haven, London, 1971 (originally published in 1951), pp. 33-97.
12. M. T. Tabucanon, "Multiple Criteria Decision Making in Industry," Elsevier Science: New York, NY, 1988.
13. A. E. Ames, N. Mattuci, S. Macdonald, G. Szonyi and D. M. Hawkins, "Quality Loss Functions for Optimization Across Multiple Response Surfaces," Journal of Quality Technology, 29, pp. 339-346.
14. A. I. Khuri and M. Conlon, "Simultaneous Optimization of Multiple Responses Represented by Polynomial Regression Functions," Technometrics, 1981, 23(4), pp. 363-375.
15. G. G. Vining, "A Compromise Approach to Multiple Response Optimization," Journal of Quality Technology, 30, pp.309-313.
16. R. H. Myers and W. H. Carter, "Response Surface Techniques for Dual Response Systems," Technometrics, 1973, 15, pp. 307-317.
17. G. G. Vining and R. H. Myers, "Combining Taguchi and Response Surface Philosophies: A Dual Response Approach," Journal of Quality Technology, 1990, 22, pp. 38-45.
18. D. K. J. Lin and W. Tu, "Dual Response Surface Optimization," Journal of Quality Technology, 1995, 27, pp. 34-39.
19. K. A. Copeland and P. R. Nelson, "Dual Response Optimization via Direct Function Minimization," Journal of Quality Technology, 1996, 28, pp. 331-336.
20. L. C. Tang and K. Xu, "A Unified Approach for Dual Response Surface Optimization," Journal of Quality Technology, 2002, 34, pp. 437-447.
21. K. Xu, D. K. J. Lin, L. C. Tang and M. Xie, "Multiresponse Systems Optimization Using Goal Attainment Approach," 2004, HE Transactions, 36, pp. 433-445.
22. C. R. Boyle and W. S. Shin, "An Interactive Multiple-Response Simulation Optimization Method," 1996, IIE Transactions, 28, pp. 453-462.
23. O. Koksoy and N. Doganaksoy, "Joint Optimization of Mean and Standard Deviation Using Response Surface Methods," 35(3), 2003, pp.239-252.
24. K. M. Mittienen, "Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization," Kluwer Academic Publisher, Norwell, MA.
25. BV. J. Jr., Bowman, "On the Relationship of the Tchebycheff Norm and the Efficient Frontier of Multi-Criteria Objectives," Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Edited by H. Thiriez, S. Zionts, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical System 130, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1976, pp. 76-85.
26. M. Zeleny, "Compromise Programming," Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Edited by J. L. Cochrane, M. Zeleny, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, South Carolina, 1973, pp. 262-301.
27. G. E. P. Box and N. R. Draper, "Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces," John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
28. L. S., Lasdon, A. D., Wasdon, A. Jain and M. Ramer, "Design and Testing of a Generalized Reduced Gradient Code for Nonlinear Programming," ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 1978, Vol 4(1), pp. 34-49.
29. E. Del Castillo and D. C. Montgomery, "A Nonlinear Programming Solution to the Dual Response Problem," Journal of Quality Technology, 25, pp. 199-204.
30. nd Edition, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.