Ensemble of surrogates

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 199-216

  Goel, Tushar ^a   Haftka, Raphael T ^a   Shyy, Wei ^b   Queipo, Nestor V ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA   (Venezuela)

Author keywords

Kriging; Multiple surrogate models; Polynomial response surfaces; Radial basis neural networks

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; ERROR ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; PROBLEM SOLVING; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

KRIGING; MULTIPLE SURROGATE MODELS; POLYNOMIAL RESPONSE SURFACES;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 33846688018     PISSN: 1615147X     EISSN: 16151488     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-006-0051-9     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Barthelemy J-FM, Haftka RT (1993) Approximation concepts for optimum structural design - a review. Struct Optim 5:129-144
2. Dixon LCW, Szegö GP (1978) Towards global optimization 2. North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3. Fang H, Rais-Rohani M, Liu Z, Horstemeyer MF (2005) A comparative study of metamodeling methods for multi-objective crashworthiness optimization. Comput Struct 83:2121-2136
4. Giunta A, Watson LT (1998) A comparison of approximation modeling techniques: polynomial versus interpolating models. In: 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis & optimization, St. Louis, MO, 2-4 September 1998, 1:392-404, AIAA-98-4758
5. Hesterberg T, Moore DS, Monaghan S, Clipson A, Epsterin R (2005) Bootstrap methods and permutation tests. Freeman, New York (Chapter 14)
6. Huber F (2001) Turbine aerodynamic design tool development. In: Space transportation fluids workshop. Marshall Space Flight Center, AL
7. Jin R, Chen W, Simpson TW (2001) Comparative studies of meta-modeling techniques under multiple modeling criteria. Struct Multidisc Optim 23(1): 1-13
8. W, Padula S (2005) Approximation methods for conceptual design of complex systems. In: Chui C, Neaumtu M, Schumaker L (eds) Approximation Theory XI: Gatlinburg 2004, Nashboro Press, Brentwood, TN, pp 241-278
9. Mack Y, Goel T, Shyy W, Haftka RT (2005a) Surrogate model-based optimization framework: a case study in aerospace design. In: Yang S, Ong YS, Jin Y (eds). Kluwer
10. Mack Y, Goel T, Shyy W, Haftka RT, Queipo NV (2005b) Multiple surrogates for shape optimization for bluff-body facilitated mixing. In: 43rd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, Nevada 10-13 January 2005, AIAA 2005-0333
11. Martin JD, Simpson TW (2005) Use of Kriging models to approximate deterministic computer models. AIAA J 43(4):853-863
12. MATLAB® (2002) The language of technical computing, Version 6.5 Release 13. ©1984-2002, The MathWorks Inc.
13. Myers RH, Montgomery DC (1995) Response surface methodology-process and product optimization using designed experiments. Wiley, New York
14. Orr MJL (1996) Introduction to radial basis neural networks. Technical report. Center for Cognitive Science, Edinburgh University, Scotland, UK. http://anc.cd.ac.uk/rbf/
15. Papila N, Shyy W, Griffin LW, Dorney DJ (2001) Shape optimization of supersonic turbines using response surface and neural network methods. J Propuls Power 18:509-518
16. Queipo NV, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Goel T, Vaidyanathan R, Tucker PK (2005) Surrogate-based analysis and optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 41:1-28
17. Shyy W, Papila N, Vaidyanathan R, Tucker PK (2001) Global design optimization for aerodynamics and rocket propulsion components. Prog Aerosp Sci 37:59-118
18. Simpson TW, Peplinski JD, Koch PN, Allen JK (2001) Meta-models for computer based engineering design: survey and recommendations. Eng Comput 17:129-150
19. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, Haftka RT (1997) Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments. Struct Optim 14:1-23
20. Stander N, Roux W, Giger M, Redhe M, Fedorova N, Haarhoff J (2004) A comparison of meta-modeling techniques for crashworthiness optimization. In: Proceedings of the 10th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, Albany, NY, 30 August-1 September 2004, AIAA-2004-4489
21. Ueberhuber CW (1997) Numerical computation 2: methods, software and analysis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 71
22. Vaidyanathan R, Tucker PK, Papila N, Shyy W (2004) CFD based design optimization for a single element rocket injector. J Propuls Power 20(4):705-717 (also presented in 41st Aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, 2003)
23. Zerpa L, Queipo NV, Pintos S, Salager J (2005) An optimization methodology of alkaline-surfactant-polymer flooding processes using field scale numerical simulation and multiple surrogates. J Pet Sci Eng 47:197-208 (also presented at SPE/DOE 14th symposium on improved oil recovery, 2004, April 17-21, Tulsa)