Measuring Primary Teachers' Attitudes Toward Teaching Science: Development of the Dimensions of Attitude Toward Science (DAS) Instrument

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 577-600

  van Aalderen Smeets, Sandra ^a   Walma van der Molen, Juliette ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attitude instrument; Attitude toward science; Instrument validation; Primary education; Primary teachers; Science education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873986623     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2012.755576     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ajzen, I. 2001. Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52: 27-58. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27
2. Alwin, D. F. 1992. Information transmission in the survey interview: Number of response categories and the reliability of attitude measurement. Sociology Methodology, 22: 83-118. (doi:10.2307/270993)
3. Appleton, K. and Kindt, I. 1999. Why teach primary science? Influences on beginning teachers' practices. International Journal of Science Education, 21: 155-168. (doi:10.1080/095006999290769)
4. Asma, L.J.F., Walma van der Molen, J.H., & van Aalderen-Smeets, S.I. (2011). Primary teachers' attitudes towards science: Results of a focus group study. In M.J. de Vries, H. van Keulen, S. Peters, & J.H. Walma van der Molen (Eds.). Professional development for primary teachers in science. The Dutch VTB-Pro project in an international perspective (pp. 89-105). Rotterdam: Sense.
5. Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, New York, NY: Freeman.
6. Barmby, P., Kind, P. M. and Jones, K. 2008. Examining changing attitudes in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30: 1075-1093. doi: 10.1080/09500690701344966
7. Bennett, J., Rollnick, M., Green, G. and White, M. 2001. The development and use of an instrument to assess students' attitude to the study of chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 23: 833-845. doi: 10.1080/09500690010006554
8. Blalock, C. L., Lichtenstein, M. J., Owen, S., Pruski, L., Marshall, C. and Toepperwein, M. 2008. In pursuit of validity: A comprehensive review of science attitude instruments 1935-2005. International Journal of Science Education, 30: 961-977. doi: 10.1080/09500690701344578
9. Bleicher, R. E. 2007. Nurturing confidence in preservice elementary science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18: 841-860. doi: 10.1007/s10972-007-9067-2
10. Coulson, R. 1992. Development of an instrument for measuring attitudes of early childhood educators towards science. Research in Science Education, 22: 101-105. (doi:10.1007/BF02356884)
11. Dalgety, J., Coll, R. K. and Jones, A. 2003. Development of chemistry attitudes and experiences questionnaire (CAEQ). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40: 649-668. doi: 10.1002/tea.10103
12. Denessen, E., Vos, N., Damen, T., Koch, S., Louws, M. and Wigboldus, D. 2011. "Explicit and implicit measures of teacher attitudes towards science and technology". In Professional development for primary teachers in science. The Dutch VTB-Pro project in an international perspective, Edited by: de Vries, M.J., van Keulen, H., Peters, S. and Walma van der Molen, J.H. 107-119. Rotterdam: Sense.
13. Enochs, L. G. and Riggs, I. M. 1990. Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90: 694-706. (doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb12048.x)
14. Gardner, P. L. 1995. Measuring attitudes to science: Unidimensionality and internal consistency revisited. Research in Science Education, 25: 283-289. doi: 10.1007/BF02357402
15. Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools. A research report for the Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs. Canberra, Australia.
16. Haney, J. J., Czerniak, C. M. and Lumpe, A. T. 1996. Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33: 971-993. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199611)33:9<971::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-S
17. Harlen, W. and Holroyd, C. 1997. Primary teachers' understanding of concepts of science: Impact on confidence and teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 19: 93-105. doi: 10.1080/0950069970190107
18. Jarvis, T. and Pell, A. 2004. Primary teachers' changing attitudes and cognition during a two-year science inservice program and their effect on pupils. International Journal of Science Education, 26: 1787-1811. doi: 10.1080/0950069042000243763
19. Johnston, J. and Ahtee, M. 2006. Comparing primary student teachers' attitudes, subject knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge needs in a physics activity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22: 503-512. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2005.11.015
20. Kind, P. M., Jones, K. and Barmby, P. 2007. Developing attitudes towards science measures. International Journal of Science Education, 29: 871-893. doi: 10.1080/09500690600909091
21. Krosnick, J.A. and Fabrigar, L. R. 1997. "Designing rating scales for effective measurement in surveys". In Survey measurement and process quality, Edited by: Lyberg, L., Biemer, P., Collins, M., de Leeuw, E., Dippo, C., Schwarz, N. and Trewin, D. 141-152. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
22. Lumpe, A. T., Haney, J. J. and Czerniak, C. M. 2000. Assessing teachers' beliefs about their science teaching context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37: 275-292. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200003)37:3<275::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-2
23. Lyberg, L., Biemer, P., Collins, M., de Leeuw, E., Dippo, C., Schwarz, N. and Trewin, D. 1997. Survey measurement and process quality, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
24. Osborne, J., Simon, S. and Collins, S. 2003. Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25: 1049-1079. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000032199
25. Pajares, M. F. 1992. Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62: 307-332. doi: 10.3102/00346543062003307
26. Pardo, R. and Calvo, F. 2002. Attitudes towards science among the European public: A methodological analysis. Public Understanding of Science, 11: 155-195. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/11/2/305
27. Plonczak, I. 2008. Science for all: Empowering elementary school teachers. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 3: 167-181. doi: 10.1177/1746197908090081
28. Reid, N. 2006. Thoughts on attitude measurement. Research in Science & Technological Education, 24: 3-27. (doi:10.1080/02635140500485332)
29. Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Brussels: European Commission. Directorate-General for Research.
30. Schwarz, N. 2008. "Attitude measurement". In Attitudes and attitude change, Edited by: Crano, W. and Prislin, R. 41-60. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
31. Shrigley, R. L. 1974. The attitude of preservice elementary teachers towards science. School Science and Mathematics, 74: 243-250. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1974.tb09237.x
32. Shrigley, R. L. and Johnson, T. M. 1974. The attitude of inservice elementary teachers towards science. School Science and Mathematics, 74: 437-446. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1974.tb08927.x
33. Skamp, K. 1991. Primary science: How confident are teachers?. Research in Science Education, 21: 290-299. doi: 10.1007/BF02360483
34. Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. 2001. Using multivariate statistics, Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
35. Thompson, C. L. and Shrigley, R. L. 1986. What research says: Revising the Science Attitude Scale. School Science and Mathematics, 86: 331-343. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1986.tb11625.x
36. Tosun, T. 2000. The beliefs of preservice elementary teachers towards science and science teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 100: 374-379. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb18179.x
37. Trochim, W. M. and Donnelly, J. P. 2006. The research methods knowledge base, 3, Cincinnati, OH: Atomic Dog.
38. Van Aalderen-Smeets, S. I., Walma van der Molen, J. H. and Asma, L. J.F. 2012. Primary teachers' attitude toward science: A new theoretical framework. Science Education, 96: 158-182. doi: 10.1002/sce.20467
39. Van Aalderen-Smeets, S.I., & Walma van der Molen, J.H. (in preparation). Improving primary teachers' attitude toward science by attitude focussed professional development.
40. Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D. and Verloop, N. 2001. Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38: 137-158. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2
41. Velayutham, S., Aldridge, J. and Fraser, B. 2011. Development and validation of an instrument to measure student's motivation and self-regulation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 33: 2159-2179. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.541529
42. Walma van der Molen, J.H., van Aalderen-Smeets, S.I., & Asma, L.J.F. (2010). Teaching science at primary school level: Theoretical and practical considerations for primary school teachers' professional training. Proceedings of the IOSTE Symposium on Science Education, Vol. 14. June 2010. Retrieved fromhttp://files.ecetera.si/IOSTE/450.pdf
43. Weinburgh, M. 2007. The effect of Tenebrio obscurus on elementary preservice teachers' content knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18: 801-815. doi: 10.1007/s10972-007-9073-4
44. Yates, S. and Goodrum, D. 1990. How confident are primary school teachers in teaching science?. Research in Science Education, 20: 300-305. doi: 10.1007/BF02620506