Priming effects under correct change detection and change blindness

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 290-305

  Caudek, Corrado ^a,c   Domini, Fulvio ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Awareness; Change blindness; Implicit change detection; Negative compatibility effect; Negative priming

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CHANGE BLINDNESS; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; RETINA IMAGE; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 84873740223     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Allen P.A., Goldstein B., Madden D.J., Mitchell D.B. Adult age differences in long-term semantic priming. Experimental Aging Research 1997, 23:107-135.
2. Baayen R.H. Practical data analysis for the language sciences with R 2008, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Baayen R.H., Davidson D.J., Bates D.M. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:390-412.
4. Baayen R.H., Milin P. Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research 2010, 3(2):12-28.
5. Barbot A., Kouider S. Longer is not better: non-conscious overstimulation reverses priming influences under interocular suppression. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 2012, 74:174-184.
6. Bermeitinger C., Wentura D., Frings C. Nature and facts about natural and artifactual categories: Sex differences in the semantic priming paradigm. Brain & Language 2008, 106:153-163.
7. Boynton R.M., Kandel G. On responses in the human visual system as a function of adaptation level. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1957, 47:275-286.
8. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:433-436.
9. Broadbent D.E. Perception and communication 1987, Oxford University Press, London.
10. Busch N.A. Objective and subjective measures of change blindness: Where are the real pitfalls?. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 22:1903-1905.
11. Carr T.H., Dagenbach D. Semantic priming and repetition priming from masked words: evidence for a centre-surround attentional mechanism in perceptual recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1990, 16:341-350.
12. Caudek C., Domini F., Di Luca M. Short-term temporal recruitment in structure from motion. Vision Research 2002, 42:1213-1223.
13. Christensen, R. H. B. (2012). Ordinal: Regression Models for Ordinal Data R Package Version 2012.01-19.
14. Clark H.H. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1973, 12:335-359.
15. Devinck F., Knoblauch K. A common signal detection model accounts for both perception and discrimination of the watercolor effect. Journal of Vision 2012, 12(3:1):1-14.
16. Domini F., Caudek C., Skirko P. Temporal integration of motion and stereo cues to depth. Perception & Psychophysics 2003, 65:48-57.
17. Domini F., Vuong Q., Caudek C. Temporal integration in structure from motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:816-838.
18. Eimer M., Schlaghecken F. Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming. Biological Psychology 2003, 64:7-26.
19. Fernandez-Duque D., Thornton I.M. Change detection without awareness: Do explicit reports underestimate the representation of change in the visual system?. Visual Cognition 2000, 7:323-344.
20. Fernandez-Duque D., Thornton I.M. Explicit mechanisms do not account for implicit localization and identification of change: An empirical reply to Mitroff et al. (2002). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:846-858.
21. Forster K., Dickinson R. More on the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: Monte Carlo estimates of error rates for F1, F2, f, and min f. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1976, 15:135-142.
22. Frings C., Wentura D. Negative priming with masked distractor-only prime trials: Awareness moderates negative priming. Experimental Psychology 2005, 52:131-139.
23. Gelman A., Hill J. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models 2007, Cambridge University Press.
24. Gordon R.D. Selective attention during scene perception: Evidence from negative priming. Memory & Cognition 2006, 34:1484-1494.
25. Hannula D.E., Simons D.J., Cohen N.J. Imaging implicit perception: Promise and pitfalls. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2005, 6:247-255.
26. Henderson J.M., Hollingworth A. The role of fixation position in detecting scene changes across saccades. Psychological Science 1999, 10:438-443.
27. Hollingworth A. Failures of retrieval and comparison constrain change detection in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:388-403.
28. Hollingworth A., Henderson J.M. Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:113-136.
29. Huber D.E. Immediate priming and cognitive aftereffects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2008, 137:324-347.
30. Huber D.E., O'Reilly R.C. Persistence and accommodation in short-term priming and other perceptual paradigms: Temporal segregation through synaptic depression. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal 2003, 27:403-430.
31. Huber D.E., Shiffrin R.M., Lyle K.B., Quach R. Mechanisms of source confusion and discounting in short-term priming 2: Effects of prime similarity and target duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 2002, 28:1120-1136.
32. Huber D.E., Shiffrin R.M., Quach R., Lyle K.B. Mechanisms of source confusion and discounting in short-term priming: 1. Effects of prime duration and prime recognition. Memory and Cognition 2002, 30:745-757.
33. Jensen M.S., Yao R., Street W.N., Simons D.J. Change blindness and inattentional blindness. WIREs Cognitive Science 2011, 2:529-546.
34. Jonides J., Mack R. On the cost and benefit of cost and benefit. Psychological Bulletin 1984, 96:29-44.
35. Kanwisher N.G. Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition 1987, 27:117-143.
36. Kliegl R., Masson M.E.J., Richter E.M. A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming. Visual Cognition 2010, 18:655-681.
37. Laloyaux C., Destrebecqz A., Cleeremans A. Implicit change identification: A replication of Fernandez-Duque and Thornton (2003). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 6:1366-1379.
38. Laloyaux C., Devue C., Doyena S., David E., Cleeremans A. Undetected changes in visible stimuli influence subsequent decisions. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17:646-656.
39. Lavie N. The role of perceptual load in visual awareness. Brain Research 2006, 1080:91-100.
40. Laws K.R., Leeson V.C., Gale T.M. The effect of " masking" on picture naming. Cortex 2002, 38:137-148.
41. McCarley J.S., Vais M.J., Pringle H., Kramer A.F., Irwin D.E., Strayer D.L. Conversation disrupts change detection in complex traffic scenes. Human Factors 2004, 46:424-436.
42. McNamara T.P. Semantic priming: Perspectives from memory and word recognition 2005, Psychology Press, Hove, England.
43. Mitroff S.R., Simons D.J., Franconeri S.L. The siren song of implicit change detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:798-815.
44. Moss H.E., Ostrin R.K., Tyler L.K., Marslen-Wilson W.D. Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: Evidence from priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1995, 21:863-883.
45. Musch J., Klauer K.C. Locational uncertainty moderates affective congruency effects in the evaluative decision task. Cognition and Emotion 2001, 15:167-188.
46. Noë A., Pessoa L., Thompson E. Beyond the grand illusion: What change blindness really teaches us about vision. Visual Cognition 2000, 7:93-106.
47. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:437-442.
48. Pinheiro J.C., Bates D.M. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. Statistics and Computing 2000, Springer, New York.
49. Raaijmakers J.G.W., Schrijnemakers J.M.C., Gremmen F. How to deal with " the language as fixed effect fallacy" : Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language 1999, 41:416-426.
50. Raymond J.E., Shapiro K.L., Arnell K.M. Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:849-860.
51. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20years of research. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124:372-422.
52. Rensink R.A. Visual sensing without seeing. Psychological Science 2004, 15:27-32.
53. Rensink R.A., O'Regan J.K., Clark J.J. To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science 1997, 8:368-373.
54. Rieth C.A., Huber D.E. Priming and habituation for faces: Individual differences and inversion effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2010, 36:596-618.
55. Silverman M.E., Mack A. Change blindness and priming: When it does and does not occur. Consciousness and Cognition 2006, 15:409-422.
56. Simons D.J. In sight, out of mind: When object representations fail. Psychological Science 1996, 7:301-305.
57. Simons D.J., Levin D.T. Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1998, 5:644-649.
58. Simons D.J., Rensink R.A. Change blindness: Past, present, and future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9:16-20.
59. Sumner P. Negative and positive masked-priming - Implications for motor inhibition. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 2007, 3:317-326.
60. Sumner P., Tsai P.C., Yu K., Nachev P. Attentional modulation of sensorimotor processes in the absence of perceptual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006, 103:10520-10525.
61. Thornton I.M., Fernandez-Duque D. An implicit measure of undetected change. Spatial Vision 2000, 14:21-44.
62. Tipper S.P. Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 2001, 54A:321-343.
63. Tipper S.P., Brehaut J.C., Driver J. Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1990, 16:492-504.
64. Treue S., Andersen R.A., Ando H., Hildreth E.C. Structure-from-motion: Perceptual evidence for surface interpolation. Vision Research 1995, 35:139-148.
65. VanRullen R., Koch C. Competition and selection during visual processing of natural scenes and objects. Journal of Vision 2003, 3:75-85.
66. Weidemann C.T., Huber D.E., Shiffrin R.M. Confusion and compensation in visual perception: Effects of spatiotemporal proximity and selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 2005, 31:40-61.
67. Wright D.B., Horry R., Skagerberg E.M. Functions for traditional and multilevel approaches to signal detection theory. Behavior Research Methods 2009, 41:257-267.
68. Wright D.B., London K. Multilevel modeling: Beyond the basic applications. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 2009, 41:257-267.
69. Yeh Y., Yang C. Is a pre-change object representation weakened under correct detection of a change?. Consciousness and Cognition 2009, 18:91-102.