Priming and habituation for faces: Individual differences and inversion effects

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 596-618

  Rieth, Cory A ^a   Huber, David E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Face perception; Habituation; Individual differences; Short term priming

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; HABITUATION; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; LEARNING; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; RECALL; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; CUES; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MENTAL RECALL; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 77955527957     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0018737     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Abbott L.F., Varela J.A., Sen K., Nelson S.B. Synaptic depression and cortical gain control. Science 1997, 275:220-224.
2. Anaki D., Boyd J., Moscovitch M. Temporal integration in face perception: Evidence of configural processing of temporally separated face parts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:1-19.
3. Batchelder W.H., Riefer D.M. Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review 1990, 97:548-564.
4. Bennett J.D., Lleras A., Oriet C., Enns J.T. A negative compatibility effect in priming of emotional faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:908-912.
5. Carlson, C. A., & Gronlund, S. D. (2007, November). Computer-generated faces are not processed like real faces. Presented at Psychonomics, Long Beach, CA.
6. Carpenter G.A., Grossberg S. Adaptive resonance theory. The handbook of brain theory and neural networks 2003, 87-90. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 2 ed. M.A. Arbib (Ed.).
7. Coltheart V., Langdon R. Repetition blindness for words yet repetition advantage for nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2003, 29:171-185.
8. Dawson G., Webb S.J., McPartland J. Understanding the nature of face processing impairment in autism: Insights from behavioral and electrophysiological studies. Developmental Neuropsychology 2005, 27:403-424.
9. Deruelle C., Rondan C., Gepner B., Tardif C. Spatial frequency and face processing in children with autism and asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2004, 34:199-209.
10. Duchanie B.C., Yovel G., Butterworth E.J., Nakayama K. Prosopagnosia as an impairment to face-specific mechanisms: Elimination of the alternative hypothesis in a developmental case. Cognitive Neurophychology 2006, 23:714-747.
11. Egan J.P. Signal detection theory and ROC analysis 1975, Academic Press, New York.
12. Farah M.J., Tanaka J.W., Drain H.M. What causes the face inversion effect?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21:628-634.
13. Farah M.J., Wilson K.D., Drain H.M., Tanaka J.R. What is 'special' about face perception?. Psychological Review 1998, 105:482-498.
14. Fox C.J., Barton J.J.S. What is adapted in face adaptation? The neural representations of expression in the human visual system. Brain Research 2007, 1127:80-89.
15. Freire A., Lee K., Symons L.A. The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence. Perception 2000, 29:159-170.
16. Gauthier I., Logothetis N.K. Is face recognition not so unique after all?. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2000, 17:125-142.
17. Gauthier I., Nelson C.A. The development of face expertise. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2001, 11:219-224.
18. Gauthier I., Tarr M.J., Anderson A.W., Skudlarski P., Gore J.C. Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nature Neuroscience 1999, 2:568-573.
19. Grill-Spector K., Henson R., Martin A. Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:14-23.
20. Huber D.E., Shiffrin R.M., Lyle K.B., Ruys K.I. Perception and preference in short-term word priming. Psychological Review 2001, 108:149-182.
21. Huber D.E. Immediate priming and cognitive aftereffects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2008, 137:324-347.
22. Huber D.E. Causality in time: Explaining away the future and the past. The probabilistic mind: Prospects for rational models of cognition 2008, 351-376. Oxford University Press, Oxford. M. Oaksford, N. Chater (Eds.).
23. Huber, D. E., & Cousineau, D. (2004). A race model of perceptual forced choice reaction time. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 687-692). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Huber D.E., O'Reilly R.C. Persistence and accommodation in short-term priming and other perceptual paradigms: Temporal segregation through synaptic depression. Cognitive Science 2003, 27:403-430.
25. Huber D.E., Shiffrin R.M., Lyle K.B., Quach R. Mechanisms of source confusion and discounting in short term priming 2: Effects of prime similarity and target duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 2002, 28:1120-1136.
26. Huber D.E., Tian X., Curran T., O'Reilly C., Woroch B. The dynamics of integration and separation: ERP, MEG, and neural network studies of immediate repetition effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:1389-1416.
27. Hummel J.E., Biederman I. Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review 1992, 99:480-517.
28. Irwin J.R., McClelland G.H. Negative consequences of dichotomizing continuous predictor variables. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) 2003, 40:366-371.
29. Kanwisher N. Domain specificity in face perception. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3:759-763.
30. Kanwisher N.G. Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition 1987, 27:117-143.
31. Leder H., Bruce V. When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 2000, 53:513-536.
32. Leopold D.A., O'Toole A.J., Vetter T., Blanz V. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4:89-94.
33. Marr D. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information 1982, Freeman, New York.
34. Maurer D., Le Grand R., Mondlock C.J. The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6:255-260.
35. McCleery J.P., Allman E., Carver L.J., Dobkins K.R. Abnormal magnocellular pathway visual processing in infants at risk for Autism. Biological Psychiatry 2007, 62:1007-1014.
36. McKone E., Kanwisher N., Duchaine B.C. Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 11:8-15.
37. Merzenich M.M., Jenkins W.M., Johnston P., Schreiner C., Miller S.L., Tallal P. Temporal processing deficits of language-learning impaired children ameliorated by training. Science 1996, 271:77-81.
38. Meyer D.E., Schvaneveldt R.W. Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1971, 90:227-234.
39. Meyer D.E., Schvaneveldt R.W., Ruddy M.G. Attention and performance V 1975, 98-118. Academic Press, London. P.M.A. Rabbitt (Ed.).
40. Mosher J.C., Baillet S., Leahy R.M. EEG source localization and imaging using multiple signal classification approaches. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 1999, 16:225-238.
41. O'Reilly R.C., Munakata Y. Computational explorations in cognitive neuroscience 2000, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
42. Quelen F., Grainger J., Raymondet P. An investigation of semantic priming in schizophrenia using a new priming paradigm. Schizophrenia Research 2005, 80:173-183.
43. Rakover S.S. Featural vs. configurational information in faces: A conceptual and empirical analysis. British Journal of Psychology 2002, 93:1-30.
44. Ranganath C., Rainer G. Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2003, 4:193-202.
45. Ratcliff R., McKoon G. A counter model for implicit priming in perceptual word identification. Psychological Review 1997, 104:319-343.
46. Rhodes G., Jeffery L., Watson T.L., Clifford C.W.G., Nakayama K. Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science 2003, 14:558-566.
47. Richler J.J., Tanaka J.W., Brown D.D., Gauthier I. Why does selective attention to parts fail in face processing?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2008, 34:1356-1368.
48. Rossion B., Delvenne J.F., Debatisse D., Goffaux V., Bruyer R., Crommelinck M., Guérit J.M. Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: An event-related potentials study. Biological Psychology 1999, 50:173-189.
49. Rossion B., Gauthier I. How does the brain process upright and inverted faces?. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews 2002, 1:63-75.
50. Rotshtein P., Henson R.N.A., Treves A., Driver J., Dolan R.J. Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8:107-113.
51. Rumelhart D.E., McClelland J.L. Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: Foundations 1986, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
52. Rumelhart D.E., McClelland J.L. Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 2: Psychological and biological models 1986, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
53. Russell R., Duchaine B., Nakayama K. Super-recognizers: People with extraordinary face recognition ability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16:252-257.
54. Singer W. Neuronal synchrony: A versatile code review for the definition of relations?. Neuron 1999, 24:49-65.
55. Tanaka J.W., Pierce L.J. The neural plasticity of other-race face recognition. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2009, 9:122-131.
56. Tanaka, J. W. A race face database: Standardized set of over 200 Caucasian, African American, Asian and Hispanic faces. Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
57. Thomson A.M., West D.C. Fluctuations in pyramid-pyramid excitatory postsynaptic potentials modified by presynaptic firing pattern and postsynaptic membrane potential using paired intracellular recordings in rat neocortex. Neuroscience 1993, 54:329-346.
58. Tian, X., & Huber, D. E. (in press). Testing an associative account of semantic satiation. Cognitive Psychology.
59. Tipper S.P. The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 1985, 37:571-590.
60. Treisman A.M., Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 1980, 12:97-136.
61. Tsodyks M.V., Markram H. The neural code between neocortical pyramidal neurons depends on neurotransmitter release probability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1997, 94:719-723.
62. Weidemann C.T., Huber D.E., Shiffrin R.M. Confusion and compensation in visual perception: Effects of spatiotemporal proximity and selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:40-61.
63. Weidemann C.T., Huber D.E., Shiffrin R.M. Prime diagnosticity in short-term repetition priming: Is primed evidence discounted, even when it reliably indicates the correct answer?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 2008, 34:257-281.
64. Wenger M.J., Ingvalson E.M. A decisional component of holistic encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition 2002, 28:872-892.
65. Wenger M.J., Ingvalson E.M. Preserving informational separability and violating decisional separability in facial perception and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:1106-1118.
66. Yin R.K. Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969, 81:141-145.