Implicit change identification: A replication of Fernandez-Duque and Thornton (2003)

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1366-1379

  Laloyaux, Cédric ^a,b   Destrebecqz, Arnaud ^a   Cleeremans, Axel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^b FUND FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Attention; Awaremess; Change blindness; Change detection; Implicit change detection; Implicit memory; Visual memory; Visual perception; Visual stimulation

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; BELGIUM; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; VISION; VISUAL FIELD;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; BELGIUM; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33845651824     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1366     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ariely, D. (2001). Seeing sets: Representation by statistical properties. Psychological Science, 12, 157-162.
2. Baldassi, S., & Burr, D. C. (2000). Feature-based integration of orientation signals in visual search. Vision Research, 40, 1293-1300.
3. Beck, D. M., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., & Lavie, N. (2001). Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 645-650.
4. Cheesman, J., & Merikle, P. M. (1984). Priming with and without awareness. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 387-395.
5. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.
6. Cleeremans, A. (2005). Computational correlates of consciousness. Progress in Brain Research, 150, 81-98.
7. Cleeremans, A., & Jiménez, L. (2001). Implicit learning and consciousness: A graded, dynamic perspective. In R. M. French & A. Cleeremans (Eds.), Implicit learning and consciousness: An empirical, computational and philosophical consensus in the making? (pp. 1-40). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
8. Cleeremans, A., & McClelland, J. L. (1991). Learning the structure of event sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 235-253.
9. Dejong, R., Liang, C. C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
10. Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 343-350.
11. Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. (2003). Temporal factors in sequence learning. In L. Jiménez (Ed.), Attention and implicit learning (pp. 181-213). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
12. Dienes, Z., Altmann, G. T. M., Kwan, L., & Goode, A. (1995). Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1322-1338.
13. Dienes, Z., & Berry, D. C. (1997). Implicit learning: Below the subjective threshold. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 3-23.
14. Draine, S. C., & Greenwald, A. G. (1998). Replicable unconscious semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 286-303.
15. Dunn, J. C., & Kirsner, K. (1988). Discovering functionally independent mental processes: The principle of reversed association. Psychological Review, 95, 91-101.
16. Eimer, M., & Mazza, V. (2005). Electrophysiological correlates of change detection. Psychophysiology, 42, 328-342.
17. Fernandez-Duque, D., Grossi, G., Thornton, I. M., & Neville, H. J. (2003). Representation of change: Separate electrophysiological markers of attention, awareness, and implicit processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 491-507.
18. Fernandez-Duque, D., & Thornton, I. M. (2000). Change detection without awareness: Do explicit reports underestimate the representation of change in the visual system? Visual Cognition, 7, 323-344.
19. Fernandez-Duque, D., & Thornton, I. M. (2003). Explicit mechanisms do not account for implicit localization and identification of change: An empirical reply to Mitroff et al. (2002). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 846-858.
20. Greenwald, A. G., Abrams, R. L., Naccache, L., & Dehaene, S. (2003). Long-term semantic memory versus contextual memory in unconscious number processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 235-247.
21. Hannula, D. E., Simons, D. J., & Cohen, N. J. (2005). Opinion: Imaging implicit perception: Promise and pitfalls. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 247-255.
22. Haynes, J.-D., & Rees, G. (2005). Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 686-691.
23. Holender, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious activation in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 1-23.
24. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 113-136.
25. Kunimoto, C., Miller, J., & Pashler, H. (2001). Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination responses. Consciousness and Cognition, 10, 294-340.
26. Lakha, L., & Wright, M. J. (2004). Capacity limitations of visual memory in two-interval comparison of Gabor arrays. Vision Research, 44, 1707-1716.
27. Lamme, V. A. F. (2003). Why visual attention and awareness are different. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 12-18.
28. Landman, R., Spekreijse, H., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2003). Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness. Vision Research, 43, 149-164.
29. Li, F. F., VanRullen, R., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2002). Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 9596-9601.
30. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997, November 20). The capacity of visual short-term memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 309, 279-281.
31. Merikle, P. M., & Reingold, E. M. (1998). On demonstrating unconscious perception: Comment on Draine and Greenwald (1998). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 304-310.
32. Mitroff, S. R., Simons, D. J., & Franconeri, S. L. (2002). The siren song of implicit change detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 798-815.
33. Mitroff, S. R., Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (2004). Nothing compares 2 views: Change blindness can occur despite preserved access to the changed information. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1268-1281.
34. Moore, C. M., & Egeth, H. (1997). Perception without attention: Evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 339-352.
35. O'Regan, J. K., Rensink, R. A., & Clark, J. J. (1999, March 4). Change-blindness as a result of "mudsplashes." Nature, 398, 34.
36. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
37. Reingold, E. M., & Merikle, P. M. (1990). On the inter-relatedness of theory and measurement in the study of unconscious processes. Mind & Language, 5, 9-28.
38. Rensink, R. A. (2000a). The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 17-42.
39. Rensink, R. A. (2000b). Visual search for change: A probe into the nature of attentional processing. Visual Cognition, 7, 345-376.
40. Rensink, R. A. (2002). Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 245-277.
41. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.
42. Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 367-447.
43. Simons, D. J. (2000). Current approaches to change blindness. Visual Cognition, 7, 1-15.
44. Simons, D. J., & Ambinder, M. S. (2005). Change blindness: Theory and consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 44-48.
45. Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059-1074.
46. Simons, D. J., Chabris, C. F., Schnur, T., & Levin, D. T. (2002). Evidence for preserved representations in change blindness. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 78-97.
47. Simons, D. J., & Rensink, R. A. (2005). Change blindness: Past, present, and future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 16-20.
48. Smilek, D., Eastwood, J. D., & Merikle, P. M. (2000). Does unattended information facilitate change detection? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 480-487.
49. Snodgrass, M., & Shevrin, H. (2006). Unconscious inhibition and facilitation at the objective detection threshold: Replicable and qualitatively different unconscious perceptual effects. Cognition, 101, 43-79.
50. Thornton, I. M., & Fernandez-Duque, D. (2000). An implicit measure of undetected change. Spatial Vision, 14, 21-44.
51. Thornton, I. M., & Fernandez-Duque, D. (2002). Change blindness and transsaccadic integration. In J. Hyönä, D. P. Munoz, W. Heide, & R. Radach (Eds.), Progress in brain research (Vol. 140, pp. 99-118). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
52. Wilken, P., & Ma, W. J. (2004). A detection theory account of change detection. Journal of Vision, 4, 1120-1135.
53. Williams, P., & Simons, D. J. (2000). Detecting changes in novel, complex three-dimensional objects. Visual Cognition, 7, 297-322.