Using Collaborative Tasks to Elicit Auditory and Structural Priming

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 177-186

  Trofimovich, Pavel ^a   Mcdonough, Kim ^a   Neumann, Heike ^a  

^a Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873676924     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tesq.78     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bock, K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355-387. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6
2. Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75, B13-B25. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00081-5
3. Bybee, J. (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216-236). New York, NY: Routledge.
4. Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213-238. doi:10.2307/3587951
5. Gilabert, R., Barón, J., & Levkina, M. (2011). Manipulating task complexity across task types and modes. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 105-138). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
6. Goldberg, A. E., & Casenhiser, D. (2008). Construction learning and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 197-215). New York, NY: Routledge.
7. Keck, C., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2006). Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition: A meta-analysis. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 91-131). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
8. Kim, Y. (2009). The effects of task complexity on learner-learner interaction. System, 37, 254-268. doi:10.1016/j.system.2009.02.003
9. Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). Learners' production of passives during syntactic priming activities. Applied Linguistics, 29, 149-154. doi:10.1093/applin/amn004
10. Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309-365. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x
11. Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Children's first language acquisition from a usage-based perspective. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 168-196). New York, NY: Routledge.
12. Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 407-452). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
13. McDonough, K. (2006). Interaction and syntactic priming: English L2 speakers' production of dative constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 179-207. doi:10.1017/S0272263106060098
14. McDonough, K. (2011). Eliciting wh-questions through collaborative syntactic priming activities during peer interaction. In P. Trofimovich & K. McDonough (Eds.), Applying priming methods to L2 learning, teaching, and research: Insights from psycholinguistics (pp. 131-151). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
15. McDonough, K., & Chaikitmongkol, W. (2010). Collaborative syntactic priming activities and EFL learners' production of wh-questions. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 817-841. doi:10.3138/cmlr.66.6.817
16. McDonough, K., & Kim, Y. (2009). Syntactic priming, type frequency, and EFL learners' production of wh-questions. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 386-398. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00897.x
17. McDonough, K., & Trofimovich, P. (2008). Using priming methods in second language research. New York, NY: Routledge.
18. Nuevo, A. M., Adams, R., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2011). Task complexity, modified output, and L2 development in learner-learner interaction. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 175-202). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
19. Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169-226. doi:10.1017/S0140525X04000056
20. Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar: A meta-analysis of the research. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133-164). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
21. Schacter, D. L., & Church, B. A. (1992). Auditory priming: Implicit and explicit memory for words and voices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 915-930. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.915
22. Trofimovich, P., & Gatbonton, E. (2006). Repetition and focus on form in L2 Spanish word processing: Implications for pronunciation instruction. Modern Language Journal, 90, 519-535. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00464.x