Modelling Molecular Mechanisms: A Framework of Scientific Reasoning to Construct Molecular-Level Explanations for Cellular Behaviour

Science and Education

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 93-118

  van Mil, Marc H W ^a,b   Boerwinkel, Dirk Jan ^b   Waarlo, Arend Jan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873527041     PISSN: 09267220     EISSN: 15731901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11191-011-9379-7     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. AAAS. (2005). High school biology textbooks: A benchmarks-based evaluation. http://www. project2061. org/publications/textbook/hsbio/summary/genome. htm. Accessed November 30, 2010.
2. Abrams, E., & Southerland, S. (2001). The how's and why's of biological change: How learners neglect physical mechanisms in their search for meaning. International Journal of Science Education, 23(12), 1271-1281.
3. Adler, J. (1966). Chemotaxis in bacteria. Science, 153(3737), 708-716.
4. Adler, J. (1975). Chemotaxis in bacteria. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 44(1), 341-356.
5. Alberts, B. (1998). The cell as a collection of protein machines: Preparing the next generation of molecular biologists. Cell, 92(3), 291-294.
6. Alberts, B. (2003). DNA replication and recombination. Nature, 421(6921), 431-435.
7. Ariew, A. (2003). Ernst Mayr's 'ultimate/proximate' distinction reconsidered and reconstructed. Biology and Philosophy, 18(4), 553-565.
8. Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., et al. (2000). Gene Ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genetics, 25(1), 25-29.
9. Baker, M. D., Wolanin, P. M., & Stock, J. B. (2006). Signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis. BioEssays, 28(1), 9-22.
10. Bechtel, W. (2006). Discovering cell mechanisms: The creation of modern cell biology (Cambridge studies in philosophy and biology). New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (2005). Explanation: A mechanist alternative. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36(2), 421-441.
12. Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R. C. (1993). Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Bogen, J. (2008). Causally productive activities. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 39(1), 112-123.
14. Boogerd, F. C., Bruggeman, F. J., Hofmeyr, J. H. S., & Westerhoff, H. V. (2007). Systems biology: Philosophical foundations. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
15. Boogerd, F. C., Bruggeman, F. J., Richardson, R. C., Stephan, A., & Westerhoff, H. V. (2005). Emergence and its place in nature: A case study of biochemical networks. Synthese, 145(1), 131-164.
16. Brandon, R. N. (1984). Grene on mechanism and reductionism: More than just a side issue. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1984, 345-353.
17. Burian, R. M. (1996). Underappreciated pathways toward molecular genetics as illustrated by Jean Brachet's cytochemical embryology. In S. Sarkar (Ed.), The philosophy and history of molecular biology: New perspectives (pp. 67-85). Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer Academic.
18. Craver, C. F. (2001). Role functions, mechanisms, and hierarchy. Philosophy of Science, 68(1), 53.
19. Craver, C. F. (2002). Interlevel experiments and multilevel mechanisms in the neuroscience of memory. Philosophy of Science, 69(3), S83-S97.
20. Crick, F. (1988). What mad pursuit: A personal view of scientific discovery (Alfred P. Sloan Foundation series). New York: Basic Books.
21. Cummins, R. E. (1975). Functional analysis. Journal of Philosophy, 72, 741-764.
22. Darden, L. (2002). Strategies for discovering mechanisms: Schema instantiation, modular subassembly, forward/backward Chaining. Philosophy of Science, 69(3), S354-S365.
23. Darden, L. (2006). Reasoning in biological discoveries: Essays on mechanisms, interfield relations, and anomaly resolution (Cambridge studies in philosophy and biology). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24. Darden, L. (2007). Mechanisms and models. In D. L. Hull & M. Ruse (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to the philosophy of biology. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
25. Darden, L. (2008). Thinking again about biological mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 75(5), 958-969.
26. Darden, L., & Craver, C. (2002). Strategies in the interfield discovery of the mechanism of protein synthesis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 33(1), 1-28.
27. Dreyfus, A., & Jungwirth, E. (1990). Macro and micro about the living cell: Which explains what?. In P. L. Lijnse, P. Licht, W. de Vos, & A. J. Waarlo (Eds.). Relating macroscopic phenomena to microscopic particles: A central problem in secondary science education: proceedings of a seminar, Utrecht (pp. 107-118). Utrecht: CDB Press.
28. Duncan, R. G. (2007). The role of domain-specific knowledge in generative reasoning about complicated multileveled phenomena. Cognition and Instruction, 25(4), 271-336.
29. Duncan, R. G., & Reiser, B. J. (2007). Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels: Students' understandings of molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 938-959.
30. Duncan, R. G., & Tseng, K. A. (2011). Designing project-based instruction to foster generative and mechanistic understandings in genetics. Science Education, 95(1), 21-56.
31. Dupré, J. (2009). It is not possible to reduce biological explanations to explanations in chemistry and/or physics. In F. J. Ayala & R. Arp (Eds.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology (pp. 32-47). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
32. Engelmann, T. W. (1881). Neue methode zur untersuchung der sauerstoffausscheidung pflanzlicher und thierischer Organismen. Pflügers Archiv European Journal of Physiology, 25(1), 285-292.
33. Ferk, V., Vrtacnik, M., Blejec, A., & Gril, A. (2003). Students' understanding of molecular structure representations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(10), 1227-1245.
34. Fox Keller, E. (2009). It is possible to reduce biological explanations to explanations in chemistry and/or physics. In F. J. Ayala & R. Arp (Eds.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology (pp. 19-31). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
35. Gilbert, G. N., & Mulkay, M. J. (1984). Opening Pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Gilbert, J., Reiner, M., & Nakhleh, M. B. (Eds.). (2008). Visualization: Theory and practice in science education. Dordrecht: Springer.
37. Glaser, R. (1999). Expert knowledge and processes of thinking. In R. McCormick & C. Paechter (Eds.), Learning and knowledge (pp. 88-102). London: Chapman.
38. Glennan, S. (2002). Rethinking mechanistic explanation. Philosophy of Science, 69(s3), S342-S353.
39. Grotzer, T. A. (2003). Learning to understand the forms of causality implicit in scientifically accepted explanations. Studies in Science Education, 39(1), 1-74.
40. Harold, F. M. (2005). Molecules into cells: Specifying spatial architecture. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 69(4), 544-564.
41. Hartwell, L. H., & Hopfield, J. J. (1999). From molecular to modular cells biology. Nature, 402(6761), C47.
42. Hempel, C. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15(2), 135-175.
43. Hofmann, K. P., Spahn, C. M. T., Heinrich, R., & Heinemann, U. (2006). Building functional modules from molecular interactions. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 31(9), 497-508.
44. Kampourakis, K., Pavlidi, V., Papadopoulou, M., & Palaiokrassa, E. (2011). Children's teleological intuitions: What kind of explanations do 7-8 year olds give for the features of organisms, artifacts and natural objects? Research in Science Education. doi: 10. 1007/s11165-011-9219-4.
45. Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2008). Students' intuitive explanations of the causes of homologies and adaptations. Science & Education, 17(1), 27-47.
46. Kauffman, S. A. (1970). Articulation of parts explanation in biology and the rational search for them. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1970, 257-272.
47. Kay, L. E. (1996). Life as technology: Representing, intervening, and molecularizing. In S. Sarkar (Ed.), The philosophy and history of molecular biology: New perspectives (pp. 87-100). Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer Academic.
48. Knippels, M. C. P. J. (2002). Coping with the abstract and complex nature of genetics in biology education-The yo-yo learning and teaching strategy. Utrecht: CD-ß Press.
49. Lewis, J., & Kattman, U. (2004). Traits, genes, particles and information: Re-visiting students' understandings of genetics. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 195-206.
50. Machamer, P., Darden, L., & Craver, C. F. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67(1), 1-25.
51. Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2000). Students' cellular and molecular explanations of genetic phenomena. Journal of Biological Education, 34(4), 200.
52. Mathewson, J. H. (1999). Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators. Science Education, 83(1), 33-54.
53. Mayr, E. (1961). Cause and effect in biology. Science, 134(3489), 1501-1506.
54. Mayr, E. (1996). The autonomy of biology: The position of biology among the sciences. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 71(1), 97-106.
55. McGill, G. (2008). Molecular movies... coming to a lecture near you. Cell, 133(7), 1127-1132.
56. Michelle, C., Eric, N. W., & Glenda, C. (2008). The influence of prior knowledge on viewing and interpreting graphics with macroscopic and molecular representations. Science Education, 92(5), 848-867.
57. Moore, J. A. (1993). Science as a way of knowing: The foundations of modern biology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
58. Morange, M. (1998). A history of molecular biology (M. Cobb, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
59. Morange, M. (2008). The death of molecular biology? History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 30(1), 31-42.
60. Orphanides, G., & Reinberg, D. (2002). A unified theory of gene expression. Cell, 108(4), 439-451.
61. Pfeffer, W. F. P. (1884). Locomotorische richtungsbewegungen durch chemische reize. Untersuchungen aus dem Botanischen Institut in Tübingen, 1, 363-482.
62. Powell, A., & Dupré, J. (2009). From molecules to systems: The importance of looking both ways. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 40(1), 54-64.
63. Rappoport, L. T., & Ashkenazi, G. (2008). Connecting levels of representation: Emergent versus submergent perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 30(12), 1585-1603.
64. Richardson, R. C., & Stephan, A. (2007). Mechanism and mechanical explanation in systems biology. In F. C. Boogerd, F. J. Bruggeman, J. H. S. Hofmeyr, & H. V. Westerhoff (Eds.), Systems biology: Philosophical foundations. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
65. Russ, R. S., Scherr, R. E., Hammer, D., & Mikeska, J. (2008). Recognizing mechanistic reasoning in student scientific inquiry: A framework for discourse analysis developed from philosophy of science. Science Education, 92(3), 499-525.
66. Schönborn, K. J., & Anderson, T. R. (2006). The importance of visual literacy in the education of biochemists. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 34(2), 94-102.
67. Silverman, M., & Simon, M. (1977). Identification of polypeptides necessary for chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology, 130(3), 1317-1325.
68. Skipper, J. R. A., & Millstein, R. L. (2005). Thinking about evolutionary mechanisms: Natural selection. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36(2), 327-347.
69. Tabery, J. G. (2004). Synthesizing activities and interactions in the concept of a mechanism. Philosophy of Science, 71(1), 1-15.
70. Tamir, P., & Zohar, A. (1991). Anthropomorphism and teleology in reasoning about biological phenomena. Science Education, 75(1), 57-67.
71. Venville, G. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Exploring conceptual change in genetics using a multidimensional interpretive framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(9), 1031-1055.
72. Verhoeff, R. P., Boerwinkel, D. J., & Waarlo, A. J. (2009). Genomics in school. EMBO Reports, 10(2), 120-124.
73. Verhoeff, R. P., Waarlo, A. J., & Boersma, K. T. (2008). Systems modelling and the development of coherent understanding of cell biology. International Journal of Science Education, 30(4), 543-568.
74. Wilensky, U., & Resnick, M. (1999). Thinking in levels: A dynamic systems approach to making sense of the world. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 3-19.
75. Wimsatt, W. C. (1972). Complexity and organization. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1972, 67-86.
76. Woodward, J. (2010). Scientific Explanation. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2010 Edition). http://plato. stanford. edu/archives/spr2010/entries/scientific-explanation/.
77. Yarden, H., & Yarden, A. (2010). Learning using dynamic and static visualizations: Students' comprehension, prior knowledge and conceptual status of a biotechnological method. Research in Science Education, 40(3), 375-402.
78. Zohar, A., & Ginossar, S. (1998). Lifting the taboo regarding teleology and anthropomorphism in biology education-Heretical suggestions. Science Education, 82(6), 679-697.