Erratum: Building functional modules from molecular interactions (DOI:10.1016/j.tibs.2006.07.006);Building functional modules from molecular interactions

Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Volumn 31, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 497-508

  Hofmann, Klaus Peter ^a,b   Spahn, Christian M T ^a,b   Heinrich, Reinhart ^b   Heinemann, Udo ^c,d  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c MAX DELBRÜCK CENTER FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE   (Germany)

^d FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL FUNCTION; CELL TRANSPORT; CELL VACUOLE; MACROMOLECULE; MICROSCOPY; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN NUCLEIC ACID INTERACTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; RIBOSOME; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 33747802375     PISSN: 09680004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2006.09.004     Document Type: Erratum

References (89)

1. Alberts B. The cell as a collection of protein machines: preparing the next generation of molecular biologists. Cell 92 (1998) 291-294
2. Lappe M., and Holm L. Algorithms for protein interaction networks. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 33 (2005) 530-534
3. Stelzl U., et al. A human protein-protein interaction network: a resource for annotating the proteome. Cell 122 (2005) 957-968
4. Shen-Orr S.S., et al. Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli. Nat. Genet. 31 (2002) 64-68
5. Gavin A.C., et al. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440 (2006) 631-636
6. Aloy P., et al. Structure-based assembly of protein complexes in yeast. Science 303 (2004) 2026-2029
7. Hartwell L.H., et al. From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature 402 (1999) C47-C52
8. Politi A., et al. Mathematical modeling of nucleotide excision repair reveals efficiency of sequential assembly strategies. Mol. Cell 19 (2005) 679-690
9. Spahn C.M., et al. Domain movements of elongation factor eEF2 and the eukaryotic 80S ribosome facilitate tRNA translocation. EMBO J. 23 (2004) 1008-1019
10. Frank J., and Agrawal R.K. A ratchet-like inter-subunit reorganization of the ribosome during translocation. Nature 406 (2000) 318-322
11. Bonifacino J.S., and Glick B.S. The mechanisms of vesicle budding and fusion. Cell 116 (2004) 153-166
12. Burns M.E., and Arshavsky V.Y. Beyond counting photons: trials and trends in vertebrate visual transduction. Neuron 48 (2005) 387-401
13. Becker C.F.W., et al. Total chemical synthesis of a functional interacting protein pair: the protooncogene H-Ras and the Ras-binding domain of its effector. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 (2003) 5075-5080
14. Wimberly B.T., et al. Structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit. Nature 407 (2000) 327-339
15. Groll M., et al. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 Å resolution. Nature 386 (1997) 463-471
16. Spahn C.M., et al. Structure of the 80S ribosome from Saccharomyces cerevisiae tRNA-ribosome and subunit-subunit interactions. Cell 107 (2001) 373-386
17. Schotte F., et al. Watching a protein as it functions with 150-ps time-resolved X-ray crystallography. Science 300 (2003) 1944-1947
18. Nickell S., et al. A visual approach to proteomics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7 (2006) 225-230
19. Tjandra N., and Bax A. Direct measurement of distances and angles in biomolecules by NMR in a dilute liquid crystalline medium. Science 278 (1997) 1111-1114
20. Fiaux J., et al. NMR analysis of a 900K GroEL-GroES complex. Nature 418 (2002) 207-211
21. Narayanan S., et al. Importance of low-oligomeric-weight species for prion propagation in the yeast prion system Sup35/Hsp104. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 (2003) 9286-9291
22. Garczarek F., and Gerwert K. Functional waters in intraprotein proton transfer monitored by FTIR difference spectroscopy. Nature 439 (2006) 109-112
23. Schade U., et al. New infrared spectroscopic beamline at BESSY II. Rev. Sci. Instr. 73 (2002) 1568-1570
24. Zimmermann K., et al. Interaction with transducin depletes metarhodopsin III: a regulated retinal storage in visual signal transduction?. J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 48112-48119
25. Heck M., and Hofmann K.P. Maximal rate and nucleotide dependence of rhodopsin catalyzed transducin activation: Initial rate analysis based on a double displacement mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 276 (2001) 10000-10009
26. Körschen H.G., et al. Interaction of glutamic-acid-rich proteins with the cGMP signalling pathway in rod photoreceptors. Nature 400 (1999) 761-766
27. Kahlert M., et al. Effect of bleached rhodopsin on signal amplification in rod visual receptors. Nature 345 (1990) 537-539
28. Arshavsky V.Y., et al. G proteins and phototransduction. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 64 (2002) 153-187
29. Wallrabe H., and Periasamy A. Imaging protein molecules using FRET and FLIM microscopy. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 16 (2005) 19-27
30. + antiporter of E. coli. Biophys. J. 89 (2005) 1328-1338
31. Kay C.W., et al. Substrate-binding in quinoprotein ethanol dehydrogenase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa studied by electron paramagnetic resonance at 94 GHz. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005) 7974-7975
32. Sporbert A., et al. DNA polymerase clamp shows little turnover at established replication sites but sequential de novo assembly at adjacent origin clusters. Mol. Cell 10 (2002) 1355-1365
33. Kubitscheck U., et al. Nuclear transport of single molecules: dwell times at the nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 168 (2005) 233-243
34. Heinrich R., et al. Metabolic regulation and mathematical models. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 32 (1977) 1-82
35. Lee E., et al. The roles of APC and Axin derived from experimental and theoretical analysis of the Wnt pathway. PLoS Biol. 1 (2003) E10
36. Felber S., et al. Stochastic simulation of the transducin GTPase cycle. Biophys. J. 71 (1996) 3051-3063
37. McAdams H.H., and Arkin A. Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94 (1997) 814-819
38. Kashtan N., and Alon U. Spontaneous evolution of modularity and network motifs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 (2005) 13773-13778
39. Orphanides G., and Reinberg D. A unified theory of gene expression. Cell 108 (2002) 439-451
40. Ogle J.M., and Ramakrishnan V. Structural insights into translational fidelity. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74 (2005) 129-177
41. Kunkel T.A., and Bebenek K. DNA replication fidelity. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69 (2000) 497-529
42. Alberts B. DNA replication and recombination. Nature 421 (2003) 431-435
43. Hopfield J.J. Kinetic proofreading: A new mechanism for reducing errors in biosynthetic processes requiring high specificity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 71 (1974) 4135-4139
44. Ogle J.M., et al. Insights into the decoding mechanism from recent ribosome structures. Trends Biochem. Sci. 28 (2003) 259-266
45. Steitz T.A., and Yin Y.W. Accuracy, lesion bypass, strand displacement and translocation by DNA polymerases. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359 (2004) 17-23
46. O'Donnell M., and Kuriyan J. Clamp loaders and replication initiation. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 16 (2006) 35-41
47. Jahn R., et al. Membrane fusion. Cell 112 (2003) 519-533
48. Heinrich R., and Rapoport T.A. Generation of nonidentical compartments in vesicular transport systems. J. Cell Biol. 168 (2005) 271-280
49. Burns M.E., and Baylor D.A. Activation, deactivation, and adaptation in vertebrate photoreceptor cells. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24 (2001) 779-805
50. Kateriya S., et al. Vision in single-celled algae. News Physiol. Sci. 19 (2004) 133-137
51. Bähner M., et al. Light-regulated subcellular translocation of Drosophila TRPL channels induces long-term adaptation and modifies the light-induced current. Neuron 34 (2002) 83-93
52. Scott K., and Zuker C.S. Assembly of the Drosophila phototransduction cascade into a signalling complex shapes elementary responses. Nature 395 (1998) 805-808
53. Mansoor S.E., et al. Rhodopsin self-associates in asolectin liposomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 (2006) 3060-3065
54. Melia T.J.J., et al. A comparison of the efficiency of G protein activation by ligand-free and light-activated forms of rhodopsin. Biophys. J. 73 (1997) 3182-3191
55. Herrmann R., et al. Sequence of interactions in receptor-G protein coupling. J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 24283-24290
56. Nanoff C., et al. The carboxyl terminus of the Gα-subunit is the latch for triggered activation of heterotrimeric G proteins. Mol. Pharmacol. 69 (2006) 397-405
57. Koshland Jr. D.E., et al. Amplification and adaptation in regulatory and sensory systems. Science 217 (1982) 220-225
58. Heinrich R., et al. Mathematical models of protein kinase signal transduction. Mol. Cell 9 (2002) 957-970
59. Kholodenko B.N., et al. Quantification of information transfer via cellular signal transduction pathways. FEBS Lett. 414 (1997) 430-434
60. Bourne H.R., and Stryer L. G proteins. The target sets the tempo. Nature 358 (1992) 541-543
61. Brightman F.A., and Fell D.A. Differential feedback regulation of the MAPK cascade underlies the quantitative differences in EGF and NGF signalling in PC12 cells. FEBS Lett. 482 (2000) 169-174
62. Hervagault J.F., and Canu S. Bistability and irreversible transitions in a simple substrate cycle. J. Theor. Biol. 127 (1987) 439-449
63. Ferrell Jr. J.E., and Machleder E.M. The biochemical basis of an all-or-none cell fate switch in Xenopus oocytes. Science 280 (1998) 895-898
64. Gardner T.S., et al. Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli. Nature 403 (2000) 339-342
65. Höfer T., et al. GATA-3 transcriptional imprinting in Th2 lymphocytes: a mathematical model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99 (2002) 9364-9368
66. Ferrell Jr. J.E. Tripping the switch fantastic: how a protein kinase cascade can convert graded inputs into switch-like outputs. Trends Biochem. Sci. 21 (1996) 460-466
67. Pornillos O., et al. Mechanisms of enveloped RNA virus budding. Trends Cell Biol. 12 (2002) 569-579
68. Kitano H. Biological robustness. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5 (2004) 826-837
69. Kirschner M., and Gerhart J. Evolvability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95 (1998) 8420-8427
70. Ebenhöh O., and Heinrich R. Stoichiometric design of metabolic networks: multifunctionality, clusters, optimization, weak and strong robustness. Bull. Math. Biol. 65 (2003) 323-357
71. Ramakrishnan V. Ribosome structure and the mechanism of translation. Cell 108 (2002) 557-572
72. Wilson D.N., and Nierhaus K.H. The ribosome through the looking glass. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 42 (2003) 3464-3486
73. Moore P.B., and Steitz T.A. The involvement of RNA in ribosome function. Nature 418 (2002) 229-235
74. Ogle J.M., et al. Selection of tRNA by the ribosome requires a transition from an open to a closed form. Cell 111 (2002) 721-732
75. Valle M., et al. Incorporation of aminoacyl-tRNA into the ribosome as seen by cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Struct. Biol. 10 (2003) 899-906
76. Valle M., et al. Locking and unlocking of ribosomal motions. Cell 114 (2003) 123-134
77. Rodnina M.V., and Wintermeyer W. Ribosome fidelity: tRNA discrimination, proofreading and induced fit. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26 (2001) 124-130
78. Kurland C.G., et al. Through the accuracy window. In: Hill W.E., et al. (Ed). The Ribosome: Structure, Function, and Evolution (1990), American Society for Microbiology Press 515-526
79. Ogle J.M., et al. Recognition of cognate transfer RNA by the 30S ribosomal subunit. Science 292 (2001) 897-902
80. Segev N. Ypt and Rab GTPases: insight into functions through novel interactions. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13 (2001) 500-511
81. Whyte J.R., and Munro S. Vesicle tethering complexes in membrane traffic. J. Cell Sci. 115 (2002) 2627-2637
82. Sztul E., and Lupashin V. Role of tethering factors in secretory membrane traffic. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 290 (2006) C11-C26
83. Kim Y.G., et al. Crystal structure of bet3 reveals a novel mechanism for Golgi localization of tethering factor TRAPP. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12 (2005) 38-45
84. Turnbull A.P., et al. Structure of palmitoylated BET3: insights into TRAPP complex assembly and membrane localization. EMBO J. 24 (2005) 875-884
85. Kümmel D., et al. The structure of the TRAPP subunit TPC6 suggests a model for a TRAPP subcomplex. EMBO Rep. 6 (2005) 787-793
86. Kim M.S., et al. Biochemical and crystallographic studies reveal a specific interaction between TRAPP subunits Trs33p and Bet3p. Traffic 6 (2005) 1183-1195
87. Kümmel D., et al. Structure of the Bet3-TPC6B core of TRAPP: two TPC6 paralogs form trimeric complexes with Bet3 and Mum2. J. Mol. Biol (2006) 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.06.012
88. Okada T., et al. Activation of rhodopsin: new insights from structural and biochemical studies. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26 (2001) 318-324
89. Lamb T.D., and Pugh E.N.J. Dark adaptation and the retinoid cycle of vision. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 23 (2004) 307-380