Critical factors in reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities: A research synthesis

Learning Disabilities Research and Practice

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 66-78

  Kim, Woori ^a   Linan Thompson, Sylvia ^b   Misquitta, Radhika ^c  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^c Gateway School   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873275798     PISSN: 09388982     EISSN: 15405826     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2012.00352.x     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Bakken, J. P., Mastropieri, M. A., &, Scruggs, T. E., (1997). Reading comprehension of expository science material and students with learning disabilities: A comparison strategies. The Journal of Special Education, 31 (3), 300-324.
2. Beck, I. L., Perfetti, C. A., &, McKeown, M. G., (1982). Effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74 (4), 506-521.
3. Bos, C. S., &, Anders, P. L., (1990). Effects of interactive vocabulary instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior-high learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13 (1), 31-42
4. Boyle, J. R., (1996). The effects of a cognitive mapping strategy on the literal and inferential comprehension of students with mild disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19 (2), 86-98.
5. Boyle, J. R., (2010). Strategic note-taking for middle-school students with learning disabilities in science classes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33 (2), 93-109
6. Bulgren, J., Deshler, D. D., Schumaker, J. B., &, Lenz, B. K., (2000). The use of and effectiveness of analogical instruction in diverse secondary content classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92 (3), 426-441.
7. Buly, M., &, Valencia, S., (2003). Meeting the needs of failing readers: Cautions and considerations for state policy. Seattle: University of Washington.
8. Calhoon, M. B., (2005). Effects of a peer-mediated phonological skill and reading comprehension program on reading skill acquisition for middle school students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38 (5), 424-433. (Pubitemid 41441986)
9. Curtis, M.E., &, Longo, A.M., (1999). When adolescents can't read: Methods and materials that work. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
10. Denckla, M. B., &, Rudel, R., (1976). Rapid 'automatized' naming (ran): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14 (4), 471-479.
11. Desimone, L. M., (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38 (3), 181-199.
12. Dexter, D. D., &, Hughes, C. A., (2011). Graphic organizers and students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34 (1), 51-72.
13. DiCecco, V. M., &, Gleason, M. M., (2002). Using graphic organizers to attain relational knowledge from expository texts. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35 (4), 306-320.
14. Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Hjelm, J. W., Reutebuch, C. K., Cable, A., Tackett, K., et al. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79 (1), 262-300.
15. Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., &, Hughes, M. T., (1999). Grouping practices and reading outcomes for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 65 (3), 399-415.
16. Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., Moody, S. W., &, Schumm, J. S., (2000). How reading outcomes of students with disabilities are related to instructional grouping formats: A meta-analytic review. In, R. M. Gersten, E. Schiller, S. Vaughn, (Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues (pp. 105-135). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
17. Fisher, D., &, Frey, N., (2008). Comprehension instruction in action: The secondary classroom. Research on teaching comprehension. In, C. C. Block, &, S. G. Parris, (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 258-270). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
18. Fleisher, L. S., &, Jenkins, J. R., (1983). The effect of word- and comprehension-emphasis instruction on reading performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6 (2), 146-154.
19. Fuchs, L. S., &, Fuchs, D., (2007). A model for implementing responsiveness to intervention. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39 (5), 14-20.
20. Gajria, M., Jitendra, A. K., Sood, S., &, Sacks, G., (2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40 (3), 210-225.
21. Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birmin, B., &, Yoon, S. K., (2001). What makes professional development effective: Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38 (4), 915-945. (Pubitemid 33590046)
22. Gersten, R., Baker, S., Smith-Johnson, J., Dimino, J., &, Peterson, A., (2006). Eyes on the prize: Teaching complex historical content to middle school students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72 (3), 264-280. (Pubitemid 43318744)
23. Gersten, R., &, Brengelman, S. U., (1996). The quest to translate research into classroom practice: The emerging knowledge base. Remedial and Special Education, 17 (2). 67-74.
24. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., &, Baker, S., (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities. A Review of Research. Review of Educational Research, 71 (2), 279-320. (Pubitemid 33401602)
25. Gersten, R., Vaughn, S., Deshler, D., &, Schiller, E., (1997). What we know about using research findings: Implications for improving special education practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30 (5), 466-476.
26. Graves, A. W., (1986). Effects of direct instruction and metacomprehension training on finding main ideas. Learning Disabilities Research, 1 (2), 90-100.
27. Graves, M. F., (2000). A vocabulary program to complement and bolster a middle grade comprehension program. In, B. M. Taylor, M. F. Graves, &, P. van den Broek, (Eds.), Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades (pp. 116-135). New York: Teachers College Press.
28. Greenwood, C. R., &, Abbott, M., (2001). The research to practice gap in special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24 (4), 276-289. (Pubitemid 33370078)
29. Hedges, L. V., &, Olkin, I., (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30. Heller, R., &, Greenleaf, C. L., (2007). Literacy instruction in the content areas: Getting to the core of middle and high school improvement. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
31. Hock, M. F., Brasseur, I. F., Deshler, D. D., Catts, H. W., Marquis, J. G., Mark, C. A., et al,. (2009). What is the reading component skill profile of adolescent struggling readers in urban schools. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32 (1), 21-38.
32. Jenkins, J. R., Larson, K., &, Fleisher, L. S., (1983). Effects of error correction on word recognition and reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6 (2), 139-145.
33. Jitendra, A. K., Cole, C. L., Hoppes, M. K., &, Wilson, B., (1998). Effects of a direct instruction main idea summarization program and self-monitoring on reading comprehension of middle school students with learning disabilities. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 14 (4), 379-396.
34. Jitendra, A. K., Hoppes, M. K., &, Xin, Y. P., (2000). Enhancing main idea comprehension for students with learning problems: The role of a summarization strategy and self-monitoring instruction. The Journal of Special Education, 34 (3), 127-139.
35. Kim, A., Vaughn, S., Klingner, J. K., Woodruff, A. L., Reutebuch, C. K., &, Kouzekznzni, K., (2006). Improving the reading comprehension of middle school students with disabilities through computer-assisted collaborative strategic reading. Remedial and Special Education, 27 (4), 235-249. (Pubitemid 44214549)
36. Kim, A., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., &, Wei, S., (2004). Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with LD: A synthesis of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37 (2), 105-118. (Pubitemid 38411289)
37. Malone, L. D., &, Mastropieri, M. A., (1991). Reading comprehension instruction: Summarization and self-monitoring training for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58 (3), 270-279.
38. Mastropieri, M. A., &, Scruggs, T. E., (1997). Best practice in promoting reading comprehension in students with learning disabilities: 1976 to 1996. Remedial and Special Education, 18 (4), 197-213.
39. Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E, Mohler, L., Beranek, M., Spencer, V., Boon, R. T., et al,. (2001). Can middle school students with serious reading difficulties help each other and learn anything? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16 (1), 18-27.
40. Mathes, P. G., Denton, C. A., Fletcher, J. M., Anthony, J. L., Francis, D. J., &, Schatschneider, C., (2005). The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40 (2), 148-182. (Pubitemid 40696613)
41. Misquitta, R., (2009). Unraveling expository texts: Effective strategies for middle-school students with Learning Disability. Learning Disability Forum.
42. Moody, S. W., Vaughn, S., &, Schumm, J. S., (1997). Instructional grouping for reading: Teachers' views. Remedial and Special Education, 18 (6), 347-356.
43. Pany, D., &, Jenkins, J. R., (1978). Learning word meanings: A comparison of instructional procedures. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1 (2), 21-32.
44. Pany, D., Jenkins, J. R., &, Schreck, J., (1982). Vocabulary instruction: Effects on word knowledge and reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5 (3), 202-215.
45. RAND Reading Study Group (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward and R & D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
46. Reid, R., (1996). Research in self-monitoring with students with learning disabilities: The present, the prospects, the pitfalls. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29 (3), 317-331.
47. Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., Knutson, N., Tilly, W D., &, Collins, V., (1992). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21 (3), 459-479.
48. Stahl, S. A., &, Nagy, W. E., (2006). Teaching word meanings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
49. Swanson, E. A., (2008). Observing reading instruction for students with learning disabilities: A synthesis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31 (3), 115-133.
50. Swanson, H. L., &, Hoskyn, M., (1998). Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68 (3), 277-321. (Pubitemid 128376781)
51. Torgesen, J. K., (1982). The learning disabled child as an inactive learner. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2 (1), 45-52.
52. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health (2000). Report of National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Retrieved February 1, 2011, from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/upload/report.pdf.
53. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Kouzekanani, K., Bryant, D. P., Dickson, S., &, Blozis, S. A., (2003). Reading instruction grouping for students with reading difficulties. Remedial & Special Education, 24 (5), 301-315. (Pubitemid 37240029)
54. Wanzek, J., &, Vaughn, S., (2007). Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions. School Psychology Review, 36 (4), 541-561.
55. Webber, J., Scheuermann, B., McCall, C., &, Coleman, M., (1993). Research on self-monitoring as a behavior management technique in special education classrooms: A descriptive review. Remedial and Special Education, 14 (2), 38-56.
56. Wilder, A. A., &, Williams, J. P., (2001). Students with severe learning disabilities can learn higher order comprehension skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93 (2), 268-278.