Improbable outcomes: Infrequent or extraordinary?

Cognition

Volumn 127, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 119-139

  Teigen, Karl Halvor ^a   Juanchich, Marie ^b   Riege, Anine H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b KINGSTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Frequentistic probabilities; Improbable; Probability judgments; Unlikely; Verbal probabilities

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLIMATE CHANGE; FUZZY SYSTEM; HUMAN; IMPROBABILITY; INTELLIGENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RISK; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL CONCEPTS; TEMPERATURE;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROBABILITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84873150961     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Bocklisch F., Bocklisch S.F., Krems J. Sometimes, often, and always: Exploring the vague meanings of frequency expressions. Behavior Research Methods 2012, 44:144-157. 10.3758/s13428-011-0130-8.
2. Bonnefon J.-F., Villejoubert G. Tactful or doubtful? Expectations of politeness explain the severity bias in the interpretation of probability phrases. Psychological Science 2006, 17:747-751.
3. Bruine de Bruin W., Fischhoff B., Millstein S.G., Halpern-Felsher B.L. Verbal and numerical expressions of probability: " It's a fifty-fifty chance" Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2000, 81:115-131.
4. Brun W., Teigen K.H. Verbal probabilities: Ambiguous, context-dependent, or both?. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1988, 41:390-404.
5. Budescu D.V., Wallsten T.S. Consistency in interpretations of probabilistic phrases. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1985, 36:391-405.
6. Budescu D.V., Wallsten T.S. Processing linguistic probabilities: General principles and empirical evidence. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 1995, 32:275-318.
7. Clark D. Verbal uncertainty expressions: A critical review of two decades of research. Current Psychology: Research and Reviews 1990, 9:203-235.
8. Clarke V., Ruffin C., Hill D., Beamen A. Ratings of orally presented verbal expressions of probability by a heterogeneous sample. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1992, 22:638-656.
9. Cosmides L., Tooby J. Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature of judgments under uncertainty. Cognition 1996, 58:1-73.
10. Doupnik T.S., Richter M. Interpretations of uncertainty expressions: A cross-national study. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2003, 28:15-35.
11. Fischer K., Jungermann H. Rarely occurring headaches and rarely occurring blindness. Is rarely = rarely?. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1996, 9:153-172.
12. Fischhoff B., Bruine de Bruin W. Fifty-fifty = 50%?. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1999, 12:149-163.
13. Fox C.R., Ulkümen G. Distinguishing two concepts of uncertainty. Perspectives on thinking, judgment, and decision making 2011, 21-35. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo. W. Brun, G. Keren, G. Kirkebøen, H. Montgomery (Eds.).
14. Gigerenzer G., Hoffrage U. How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review 1995, 102:684-704.
15. Gillies D. Variants of propensity. British Journal of the Philosophy of Science 2000, 51:807-835.
16. Hacking I. The emergence of probability 1975, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
17. Hamm R.M. Selection of verbal probabilities: A solution for some problems of verbal probability expression. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991, 48:193-223.
18. Harris A.J.L., Corner A. Communicating environmental risks: Clarifying the severity effect in interpretations of verbal probability expressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2011, 37:1571-1578.
19. Harris A.J.L., Corner A., Hahn U. Estimating the probability of negative events. Cognition 2009, 110:51-64.
20. Hertwig R., Gigerenzer G. The " conjunction fallacy" revisited: How intelligent inferences look like reasoning errors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1999, 12:275-305.
21. Horn L.R. A natural history of negation 1989, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
22. Hsee C.K. The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1996, 67:247-257.
23. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007). Summary for policymakers: Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-spm.pdf.
24. Jones S.K., Jones C.T., Frisch D. Biases of probability assessment: A comparison of frequency and single-case judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1995, 61:109-122.
25. Juanchich M., Sirota M., Butler C.L. Effect of the perceived functions of linguistic risk quantifiers on risk perception, severity and decision making. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 2012, 118:72-81. 10.1016/j.obhdp. 2012.01.002.
26. Juanchich, M., Teigen, K. H., & Gourdon, A. (2013). Top scores are possible, bottom scores are certain (and middle scores are not worth mentioning): A pragmatic view of verbal probabilities, submitted for publication.
27. Juanchich M., Teigen K.H., Villejoubert G. Guilt as " likely" or as " not certain" ? Contrast as determinant of positive and negative verbal probabilities. Acta Psychologica 2010, 135:267-277.
28. Just M.A., Carpenter P.A. Comprehension of negation with quantification. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1971, 10:244-253.
29. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Variants of uncertainty. Cognition 1982, 11:143-157.
30. Keren G., Teigen K.H. The probability-outcome correspondence principle: A dispositional view of the interpretation of probability statements. Memory and Cognition 2001, 29:1010-1021.
31. Kong A., Barnett O., Mosteller F., Youtz C. How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability. New England Journal of Medicine 1999, 315:740-774.
32. Lagnado D.A., Sloman S.A. Inside and outside probability judgment. Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making 2007, 155-176. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford. D.J. Koehler, N. Harvey (Eds.).
33. Lem S. The cyberiad 1985, Harcourt, San Diego, (original published in 1967).
34. Levinson S.C. Presumptive meanings: the theory of generalized conversational implicatures 2000, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
35. Lichtenstein S., Newman R. Empirical scaling of common verbal phrases associated with numerical probabilities. Psychonomic Science 1967, 9:563-564.
36. Mazur D.J., Hickam D.H. Patients' interpretation of probability terms. Journal of General Internal Medicine 1991, 6:237-240.
37. McClelland G., Schulze W., Coursey D. Insurance for low-probability hazards: A bimodal response to unlikely events. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1993, 7:95-116.
38. Pace, P. (2007). Intelligence confidence levels. JP 2-0, Joint Intelligence (rev. Ed.), Appendix A. http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/dod/jp2_0.pdf.
39. Popper K. The propensity interpretation of probability. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1959, 10:25-42.
40. Popper K. A world of propensities: Two new views of causality 1990, Thoemmes, Bristol.
41. Reagan R., Mosteller F., Youtz C. Quantitative meanings of verbal probabilityexpressions. Journal of Applied Psychology 1989, 74:433-442.
42. Reeves T., Lockhart R.S. Distributional versus singular approaches to probability and errors in probabilistic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1993, 122:207-226.
43. Renooij S., Witteman C. Talking probabilities: Communicating probabilistic information with words and numbers. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 1999, 22:169-194.
44. Reyna V. The language of possibility and probability: Effects of negation on meaning. Memory and Cognition 1981, 9:642-650.
45. Reyna V.F., Brainerd C.J. Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in choice. Gist extraction, truncation, and conversion. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1991, 4:249-262.
46. Reyna V.F.B., Brainerd C.J. Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learning and Individual Differences 2008, 18:89-107.
47. Riege, A.H., & Teigen, K. H. (in press). Additivity neglect in probability estimates: Effects of numeracy and response format. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.11.004.
48. Sanford, A. J., Fay, N., Stewart, A., & Moxey, L. (2002). Perspective in statements of quantity, with implications for consumer psychology. Psychological Science, 130-134.
49. Sanford A.J., Moxey L.M. New perspectives on the expression of quantity. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences 2003, 12:240-243.
50. Schwarz N. Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist 1999, 54:93-105.
51. Simpson, M., Breili, K., Kierulf, H. P., Lysaker, D., Ouassou, M., & Haug, E. (2012). Estimates of future sea-level changes for Norway. Technical report of the Norwegian mapping authority. http://www.statkart.no/filestore/Illustrasjoner/Nyheter/Estimatesoffuturesea-levelchangesforNorwaySimpsonetal2012_FINAL.pdf.
52. Slovic P., Monahan J., MacGregor D.G. Violence risk assessment and risk communication: The effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats. Law and Human Behavior 2000, 24:271-296.
53. Smits T., Hoorens V. How probable is probably? It depends on whom you're talking about. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2005, 18:83-96.
54. Smithson M., Budescu D.V., Broomell S.B., Por H.-H. Never say " not:" Impact of negative wording in probability phrases on imprecise probability judgments. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 2012, 53:1262.
55. Sunstein C.S. Probability neglect: Emotions, worst cases, and law. Yale Law Journal 2002, 112:61-107.
56. Taleb N.N. The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable 2007, Penguin Books, London.
57. Teigen K.H. The language of uncertainty. Acta Psychologica 1988, 68:27-38.
58. Teigen K.H., Brun W. Yes, but it is uncertain: Direction and communicative intention of verbal probabilistic terms. Acta Psychologica 1995, 88:233-258.
59. Teigen K.H., Brun W. The directionality of verbal probability expressions: Effects on decisions, predictions, and probabilistic reasoning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1999, 80:155-190.
60. Teigen K.H., Filkuková P. Can > will: Predictions of what can happen are extreme, but believed to be probable. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2013, 26:68-78.
61. Teigen K.H., Halberg A.-M., Fostervold K.I. Single-limit interval estimates as reference points. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2007, 21:383-406.
62. Teigen K.H., Jørgensen M. When 90% confidence intervals are only 50% certain: On the credibility of credible intervals. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2005, 19:455-475.
63. Teigen, K. H., Juanchich, M., & Filkuková, P. (2013). Verbal probabilities: An alternative approach, submitted for publication.
64. Theil M. The role of translations of verbal into numerical probability expressions in risk management: A meta-analysis. Journal of Risk Research 2002, 5:177-186.
65. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin 1971, 76:105-110.
66. Villejoubert G., Almond L., Alison L. Interpreting claims in offender profiles: The role of probability phrases, base rates and perceived dangerousness. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2009, 23:36-54.
67. von Mises, R. (1961). Probability, statistics, and truth. London: Allen & Unwin (original published in 1928).
68. Wallsten T.S., Budescu D.V., Rapoport A., Zwick R., Forsyth B. Measuringthe vague meanings of probability terms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1986, 115:348-365.
69. Weiss C. Communicating uncertainty in intelligence and other professions. International Journal of Intelligence and Counter Intelligence 2007, 21:57-85.