Verbal and Numerical Expressions of Probability: "It's a Fifty-Fifty Chance"

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 115-131

  De Bruin, Wändi Bruine ^a   Fischhoff, Baruch ^c   Millstein, Susan G ^b   Halpern Felsher, Bonnie L ^b  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000792169     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2868     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Attner P. Riggins: Open for any deal; Riggin's door open to compromise; 50-50 chance of retirement. The Washington Post. 1980, August 6;F1.
2. Behn R. D., Vaupel J. W. Quick analysis for busy decision makers. 1982;Basic Books, New York.
3. Bernstein P. L. Against the gods: The remarkable story of risk. 1998;Wiley, New York.
4. Biehl, M, &, Halpern-Felsher, B. L. (, 1999, ), Adolescents' and adults' understanding of probability expressions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
5. Black W. C., Nease R. F., Tosteson A. N. A. Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger than 50 years of age. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 8:1995;720-731.
6. Bradburn N. M., Sudman S., Blair E., Locander W., Miles C., Singer E., Stocking C. Improving interview method and questionnaire design. Response effects to threatening questions in survey research. 1979;Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
7. Bragg R. Prosecutor of Susan Smith offers a small compromise. The New York Times. 1995, July 14;6.
8. Breyer S. Breaking the vicious circle. 1993;Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.
9. Bruine de Bruin W. People's understanding of probability: "It's a fifty-fifty chance." Doctoral dissertion. 1998;Carnegie Mellon UniversityDepartment of Social and Decision Sciences, Pittsburgh.
10. Bruine de Bruin, W, Fischbeck, P. S, Stiber, N. A, &, Fischhoff, B. (, 1999, ), Redistributing "fifty-fifty" responses. Manuscript in preparation.
11. David F. N. Games, gods, and gambling: The origins of probability and statistical ideas from the earliest times to the Newtonian era. 1962;Hafner, New York.
12. Davidson D. The representativeness heuristic and conjunction fallacy effect in children's decision-making. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 41:1995;328-346.
13. Dominitz J., Manski C. F. Perceptions of economic insecurity: Evidence from the Survey of Economic Expectations. Public Opinion Quarterly. 61:1997;261-287.
14. Durso J. Travers entries reflect balance of nonpower. The New York Times. 1993, August 19;12.
15. Erev I., Cohen B. L. Verbal versus numerical probabilities: Efficiency, biases, and the preference paradox. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 46:1990;102-117.
16. Fachet R. Maryland's Cole becomes a United Nations of track tonight: Cole meet has heavy foreign flavor. The Washington Post. 1977, January 14;D1.
17. Fiedler K. The dependence of the conjunction fallacy on subtle linguistic factors. Psychological Research. 50:1988;123-129.
18. Fischhoff B., Bruine de Bruin W. Fifty-fifty = 50%? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 12:1999;149-163.
19. Fischhoff B., Downs J. S., Bruine de Bruin W. Adolescent vulnerability: A framework for behavioral interventions. Applied and Preventive Psychology. 7:1998;77-94.
20. Gärdenfors P., Sahlin N. E. Unreliable probabilities, risk taking and decision making. Synthese. 53:1982;361-386.
21. Gelman R. First principles organize attention to and learning about relevant data: Number and animate-inanimate distinction as examples. Cognitive Science. 14:1990;79-106.
22. Hacking I. The emergence of probability. A philosophical study of early ideas about probability, induction, and statistical inference. 1975;Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
23. Jacobs J. E., Potenza M. T. The use of judgment heuristics to make social and object decisions: A developmental perspective. Child Development. 62:1991;166-178.
24. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures. Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. 1982a;414-421 Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
25. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Variants of uncertainty. Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. 1982b;509-520 Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
26. Karmiloff-Smith A. Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. 1992;MIT Press, Cambridge.
27. Langer E. The psychology of chance. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior. 7:1977;185-207.
28. Lardner G. Jr. 50-50 Chance of a 4th shot in Dallas, JFK panel is told. The Washington Post. 1978, September 12;A2.
29. Law, A. M, &, Kelton, W. D. (, 1982, ), Simulation modeling and analysis, New York, McGraw-Hill.
30. Mitchell H. Tulips, taxes and temblors of uncertainty. The Washington Post. 1990, November 30;F2.
31. Morgan, M. G, &, Henrion, M. (, 1990, ), Uncertainty, New York, Cambridge Univ. Press.
32. National Research Council. (, 1989, ), Improving risk communication, Washington, DC, National Academy Press.
33. Understanding risk. 1996;National Academy Press, Washington.
34. National Research Council. (, 1999, ), Toward environmental justice, Washington, DC, National Academy Press.
35. Omang J. Research ship may have to halt effort to locate Titanic. The Washington Post. 1980, August 17;A20.
36. Piaget, J, &, Inhelder, B. (, 1975, ), The origin of the idea of chance in children, New York, Norton.
37. Poulton, E. C. (, 1989, ), Bias in quantifying judgment, Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.
38. Reeves T., Lockhart R. S. Distributional versus singular approaches to probability and errors in probabilistic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 122:1993;207-226.
39. Resnick L. B. The development of mathematical intuition. Perlmutter M. Perspectives on intellectual development: Minnesota symposia on child psychology. 19:1986;Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
40. Schwartz L. M., Woloshin S., Black W. C., Welch H. G. The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Annals of Internal Medicine. 127:1997;966-972.
41. Schwarz, N. (, 1996m, ), Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods, and the logic of conversation, Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum.
42. Sharp, D, Cole, M, &, Lave, C. (, 1979, ), Education and cognitive development: The evidence from experimental research, Chicago, Univ. of Chicago Press.
43. Sloman S. A. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin. 119:1996;3-22.
44. Teigen K. H. The language of uncertainty. Acta Psychologica. 68:1988;27-38.
45. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science. 185:1974;1124-1131.
46. Tversky A., Koehler D. J. Support theory: A nonexistensional representation of subjective probability. Psychological Review. 4:1994;547-567.
47. Viscusi, W. K. (, 1993, ), The risks of smoking, Cambridge, MA, Harvard Univ. Press.
48. Wallsten T. S., Budescu D. B., Zwick R., Kemp S. M. Preferences and reasons for communicating probabilistic information in verbal or numerical terms. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 31:1993;135-138.
49. Weinstein N. D. Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 39:1980;806-820.
50. Windschitl P. D., Wells G. L. Measuring psychological uncertainty: Verbal versus numeric methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 2:1996;343-364.
51. Winterfeldt D. von, Edwards W. Decision analysis and behavioral research. 1986;Cambridge Univ. Press. Cambridge.