Fourfold paralogy regions on human HOX-bearing chromosomes: Role of ancient segmental duplications in the evolution of vertebrate genome

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 737-747

  Asrar, Zainab ^a   Haq, Farhan ^a   Abbasi, Amir Ali ^a  

^a QUAID I AZAM UNIVERSITY   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

HOX cluster; Intra genomic synteny; Multigene family; Phylogeny; Segmental duplication; Whole genome duplication

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; CHROMOSOME MAP; GENETICS; GENOME; HOMEOBOX; HUMAN; HUMAN CHROMOSOME; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYLOGENY; POLYPLOIDY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL; VERTEBRATE;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENES, HOMEOBOX; GENOME; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYLOGENY; POLYPLOIDY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VERTEBRATES;

VERTEBRATA;

EID: 84873144098     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.10.024     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Abbasi A.A. Are we degenerate tetraploids? More genomes, new facts. Biol Direct. 2008, 3:50.
2. Abbasi A.A. Piecemeal or big bangs: correlating the vertebrate evolution with proposed models of gene expansion events. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:166.
3. Abbasi A.A. Unraveling ancient segmental duplication events in human genome by phylogenetic analysis of multigene families residing on HOX-cluster paralogons. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 57:836-848.
4. Abbasi A.A., Goode D.K., Amir S., Grzeschik K.H. Evolution and functional diversification of the GLI family of transcription factors in vertebrates. Evol. Bioinform. Online 2009, 5:5-13.
5. Abbasi A.A., Grzeschik K.H. An insight into the phylogenetic history of HOX linked gene families in vertebrates. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7:239.
6. Abbasi A.A., Hanif H. Phylogenetic history of paralogous gene quartets on human chromosomes 1, 2, 8 and 20 provides no evidence in favor of the vertebrate octoploidy hypothesis. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2012, 63:922-927.
7. Altschul S.F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E.W., Lipman D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215:403-410.
8. Bailey J.A., Eichler E.E. Primate segmental duplications: crucibles of evolution, diversity and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006, 7:552-564.
9. Bailey J.A., Gu Z., Clark R.A., Reinert K., Samonte R.V., Schwartz S., Adams M.D., Myers E.W., Li P.W., Eichler E.E. Recent segmental duplications in the human genome. Science 2002, 297:1003-1007.
10. Cheng Z., Ventura M., She X., Khaitovich P., Graves T., Osoegawa K., Church D., DeJong P., Wilson R.K., Paabo S., Rocchi M., Eichler E.E. A genome-wide comparison of recent chimpanzee and human segmental duplications. Nature 2005, 437:88-93.
11. Daza D.O., Sundstrom G., Bergqvist C.A., Duan C., Larhammar D. Evolution of the insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP) family. Endocrinology 2011, 152:2278-2289.
12. Dehal P., Boore J.L. Two rounds of whole genome duplication in the ancestral vertebrate. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3:e314.
13. Donoghue P.C., Purnell M.A. Genome duplication, extinction and vertebrate evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005, 20:312-319.
14. Felsenstein J. Confidence limit on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39:95-105.
15. Furlong R.F., Holland P.W. Were vertebrates octoploid?. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2002, 357:531-544.
16. Furlong R.F., Holland P.W. Polyploidy in vertebrate ancestry: Ohno and beyond. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 2004, 82:425-430.
17. Gibson T.J., Spring J. Evidence in favour of ancient octaploidy in the vertebrate genome. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2000, 28:259-264.
18. Goode D.K., Snell P., Smith S.F., Cooke J.E., Elgar G. Highly conserved regulatory elements around the SHH gene may contribute to the maintenance of conserved synteny across human chromosome 7q36.3. Genomics 2005, 86:172-181.
19. Guindon S., Lethiec F., Duroux P., Gascuel O. PHYML Online-a web server for fast maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic inference. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33:W557-W559.
20. Hokamp K., McLysaght A., Wolfe K.H. The 2R hypothesis and the human genome sequence. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 2003, 3:95-110.
21. Hubbard T., Barker D., Birney E., Cameron G., Chen Y., Clark L., Cox T., Cuff J., Curwen V., Down T., Durbin R., Eyras E., Gilbert J., Hammond M., Huminiecki L., Kasprzyk A., Lehvaslaiho H., Lijnzaad P., Melsopp C., Mongin E., Pettett R., Pocock M., Potter S., Rust A., Schmidt E., Searle S., Slater G., Smith J., Spooner W., Stabenau A., Stalker J., Stupka E., Ureta-Vidal A., Vastrik I., Clamp M. The Ensembl genome database project. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30:38-41.
22. Hughes A.L. Phylogenetic tests of the hypothesis of block duplication of homologous genes on human chromosomes 6, 9, and 1. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1998, 15:854-870.
23. Hughes A.L. Phylogenies of developmentally important proteins do not support the hypothesis of two rounds of genome duplication early in vertebrate history. J. Mol. Evol. 1999, 48:565-576.
24. Hughes A.L., da Silva J., Friedman R. Ancient genome duplications did not structure the human Hox-bearing chromosomes. Genome Res. 2001, 11:771-780.
25. Hughes A.L., Friedman R. 2R or not 2R: testing hypotheses of genome duplication in early vertebrates. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 2003, 3:85-93.
26. Johnson M., Zaretskaya I., Raytselis Y., Merezhuk Y., McGinnis S., Madden T.L. NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36:W5-W9.
27. Kasahara M. The 2R hypothesis: an update. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2007, 19:547-552.
28. Kikuta H., Laplante M., Navratilova P., Komisarczuk A.Z., Engstrom P.G., Fredman D., Akalin A., Caccamo M., Sealy I., Howe K., Ghislain J., Pezeron G., Mourrain P., Ellingsen S., Oates A.C., Thisse C., Thisse B., Foucher I., Adolf B., Geling A., Lenhard B., Becker T.S. Genomic regulatory blocks encompass multiple neighboring genes and maintain conserved synteny in vertebrates. Genome Res. 2007, 17:545-555.
29. Kumar S., Nei M., Dudley J., Tamura K. MEGA: a biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Brief Bioinform. 2008, 9:299-306.
30. Kuraku S., Meyer A., Kuratani S. Timing of genome duplications relative to the origin of the vertebrates: did cyclostomes diverge before or after?. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2009, 26:47-59.
31. Larhammar D., Lundin L.G., Hallbook F. The human Hox-bearing chromosome regions did arise by block or chromosome (or even genome) duplications. Genome Res. 2002, 12:1910-1920.
32. Lee A.P., Koh E.G., Tay A., Brenner S., Venkatesh B. Highly conserved syntenic blocks at the vertebrate Hox loci and conserved regulatory elements within and outside Hox gene clusters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:6994-6999.
33. Lundin L.G., Larhammar D., Hallbook F. Numerous groups of chromosomal regional paralogies strongly indicate two genome doublings at the root of the vertebrates. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 2003, 3:53-63.
34. Marques-Bonet T., Girirajan S., Eichler E.E. The origins and impact of primate segmental duplications. Trends Genet. 2009, 25:443-454.
35. Martin A. Is tetralogy true? Lack of support for the "one-to-four rule" Mol. Biol. Evol. 2001, 18:89-93.
36. Martin A.P. Increasing genomic complexity by gene duplication and the origin of vertebrates. Am. Nat. 1999, 154:2.
37. McLysaght A., Hokamp K., Wolfe K.H. Extensive genomic duplication during early chordate evolution. Nat. Genet. 2002, 31:200-204.
38. Meaburn K.J., Misteli T. Cell biology: chromosome territories. Nature 2007, 445:379-781.
39. Meyer A., Schartl M. Gene and genome duplications in vertebrates: the one-to-four (-to-eight in fish) rule and the evolution of novel gene functions. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1999, 11:699-704.
40. Ohno S. Evolution by Gene Duplication 1970, Springer-Verlag.
41. Ohno S. Ancient linkage groups and frozen accidents. Nature 1973, 244:259-262.
42. Russo C.A., Takezaki N., Nei M. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1996, 13:525-536.
43. Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4:406-425.
44. Samonte R.V., Eichler E.E. Segmental duplications and the evolution of the primate genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2002, 3:65-72.
45. Skrabanek L., Wolfe K.H. Eukaryote genome duplication - where's the evidence?. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1998, 8:694-700.
46. Sundstrom G., Larsson T.A., Larhammar D. Phylogenetic and chromosomal analyses of multiple gene families syntenic with vertebrate Hox clusters. BMC Evol. Biol. 2008, 8:254.
47. Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G., Gibson T.J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22:4673-4680.
48. Van de Peer Y. Computational approaches to unveiling ancient genome duplications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004, 5:752-763.
49. Vanneste K., Van de Peer Y., Maere S. Inference of genome duplications from age distributions revisited. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012.
50. Whelan S., Goldman N. A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2001, 18:691-699.
51. Zhang G., Cohn M.J. Genome duplication and the origin of the vertebrate skeleton. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2008, 18:387-393.
52. Zhang J., Nei M. Evolution of Antennapedia-class homeobox genes. Genetics 1996, 142:295-303.