Phylogenetic history of paralogous gene quartets on human chromosomes 1, 2, 8 and 20 provides no evidence in favor of the vertebrate octoploidy hypothesis

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 922-927

  Abbasi, Amir Ali ^a   Hanif, Hafsa ^a  

^a QUAID I AZAM UNIVERSITY   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Genome duplications; Multigene families; Paralogy regions; Phylogenetic analysis; Segmental duplications; Vertebrates

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHROMOSOME 1; CHROMOSOME 2; CHROMOSOME 20; CHROMOSOME 8; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETICS; HUMAN; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PLOIDY;

CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 1; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 2; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 20; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 8; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE DUPLICATION; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; PLOIDIES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

ANIMALIA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 84859878147     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.02.028     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abbasi A.A. Are we degenerate tetraploids? More genomes, new facts. Biol. Direct. 2008, 3:50.
2. Abbasi A.A. Piecemeal or big bangs: correlating the vertebrate evolution with proposed models of gene expansion events. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:166.
3. Abbasi A.A. Unraveling ancient segmental duplication events in human genome by phylogenetic analysis of multigene families residing on HOX-cluster paralogons. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 57:836-848.
4. Abbasi A.A., Grzeschik K.H. An insight into the phylogenetic history of HOX linked gene families in vertebrates. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7:239.
5. Altschul S.F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E.W., Lipman D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215:403-410.
6. Bailey J.A., Eichler E.E. Primate segmental duplications: crucibles of evolution, diversity and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006, 7:552-564.
7. Felsenstein J. Confidence limit on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39:95-105.
8. Flicek P., Amode M.R., Barrell D., Beal K., Brent S., Chen Y., Clapham P., Coates G., Fairley S., Fitzgerald S., Gordon L., Hendrix M., Hourlier T., Johnson N., Kahari A., Keefe D., Keenan S., Kinsella R., Kokocinski F., Kulesha E., Larsson P., Longden I., McLaren W., Overduin B., Pritchard B., Riat H.S., Rios D., Ritchie G.R., Ruffier M., Schuster M., Sobral D., Spudich G., Tang Y.A., Trevanion S., Vandrovcova J., Vilella A.J., White S., Wilder S.P., Zadissa A., Zamora J., Aken B.L., Birney E., Cunningham F., Dunham I., Durbin R., Fernandez-Suarez X.M., Herrero J., Hubbard T.J., Parker A., Proctor G., Vogel J., Searle S.M. Ensembl 2011. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:D800-D806.
9. Fujita P.A., Rhead B., Zweig A.S., Hinrichs A.S., Karolchik D., Cline M.S., Goldman M., Barber G.P., Clawson H., Coelho A., Diekhans M., Dreszer T.R., Giardine B.M., Harte R.A., Hillman-Jackson J., Hsu F., Kirkup V., Kuhn R.M., Learned K., Li C.H., Meyer L.R., Pohl A., Raney B.J., Rosenbloom K.R., Smith K.E., Haussler D., Kent W.J. The UCSC Genome Browser database: update 2011. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:D876-D882.
10. Furlong R.F., Holland P.W. Were vertebrates octoploid?. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, B Biol. Sci. 2002, 357:531-544.
11. Gibson T.J., Spring J. Evidence in favour of ancient octaploidy in the vertebrate genome. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2000, 28:259-264.
12. Hokamp K., McLysaght A., Wolfe K.H. The 2R hypothesis and the human genome sequence. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 2003, 3:95-110.
13. Hughes A.L. Phylogenetic tests of the hypothesis of block duplication of homologous genes on human chromosomes 6, 9, and 1. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1998, 15:854-870.
14. Hughes A.L., Friedman R. 2R or not 2R: testing hypotheses of genome duplication in early vertebrates. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 2003, 3:85-93.
15. Hughes A.L., da Silva J., Friedman R. Ancient genome duplications did not structure the human Hox-bearing chromosomes. Genome Res. 2001, 11:771-780.
16. Johnson M., Zaretskaya I., Raytselis Y., Merezhuk Y., McGinnis S., Madden T.L. NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36:W5-W9.
17. Kasahara M. The 2R hypothesis: an update. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2007, 19:547-552.
18. Larhammar D., Lundin L.G., Hallbook F. The human Hox-bearing chromosome regions did arise by block or chromosome (or even genome) duplications. Genome Res. 2002, 12:1910-1920.
19. Lundin L.G., Larhammar D., Hallbook F. Numerous groups of chromosomal regional paralogies strongly indicate two genome doublings at the root of the vertebrates. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 2003, 3:53-63.
20. Marques-Bonet T., Girirajan S., Eichler E.E. The origins and impact of primate segmental duplications. Trends Genet. 2009, 25:443-454.
21. Martin A.P. Increasing genomic complexity by gene duplication and the origin of vertebrates. Am. Nat. 1999, 154:111-128.
22. Martin A. Is tetralogy true? Lack of support for the "one-to-four rule" Mol. Biol. Evol. 2001, 18:89-93.
23. McLysaght A., Hokamp K., Wolfe K.H. Extensive genomic duplication during early chordate evolution. Nat. Genet. 2002, 31:200-204.
24. Nei M. Phylogenetic analysis in molecular evolutionary genetics. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1996, 30:371-403.
25. Ohno S. Evolution by Gene Duplication 1970, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
26. Ohno S. Ancient linkage groups and frozen accidents. Nature 1973, 244:259-262.
27. Panopoulou G., Poustka A.J. Timing and mechanism of ancient vertebrate genome duplications - the adventure of a hypothesis. Trends Genet. 2005, 21:559-567.
28. Russo C.A., Takezaki N., Nei M. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1996, 13:525-536.
29. Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4:406-425.
30. Skrabanek L., Wolfe K.H. Eukaryote genome duplication - where's the evidence?. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1998, 8:694-700.
31. Sundström G., Larsson T.A., Larhammar D. Phylogenetic and chromosomal analyses of multiple gene families syntenic with vertebrate Hox clusters. BMC Evol. Biol. 2008, 8:254.
32. Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G., Gibson T.J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22:4673-4680.
33. Whelan S., Goldman N. A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2001, 18:691-699.