Unraveling ancient segmental duplication events in human genome by phylogenetic analysis of multigene families residing on HOX-cluster paralogons

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 836-848

  Abbasi, Amir Ali ^a  

^a QUAID I AZAM UNIVERSITY   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Co duplications; HOX paralogons; Multigene families; Phylogeny; Segmental duplications; Vertebrates; Whole genome duplications

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETICS; HOMEOBOX; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYLOGENY; SEGMENTAL DUPLICATION;

ANIMALS; GENE DUPLICATION; GENES, HOMEOBOX; GENOME, HUMAN; HUMANS; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYLOGENY; SEGMENTAL DUPLICATIONS, GENOMIC;

ANIMALIA; OSTEICHTHYES; PRIMATES; TETRAPODA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 78049370094     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.07.021     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Abbasi A.A. Are we degenerate tetraploids? More genomes, new facts. Biology Direct 2008, 3:50.
2. Abbasi A.A. Piecemeal or big bangs: correlating the vertebrate evolution with proposed models of gene expansion events. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:166.
3. Abbasi A.A., Goode D.K., Amir S., Grzeschik K.H. Evolution and functional diversification of the GLI family of transcription factors in vertebrates. Evol. Bioinform. Online 2009, 5:5-13.
4. Abbasi A.A., Grzeschik K.H. An insight into the phylogenetic history of HOX linked gene families in vertebrates. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7:239.
5. Altschul S.F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E.W., Lipman D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215:403-410.
6. Bailey J.A., Eichler E.E. Primate segmental duplications: crucibles of evolution, diversity and disease. Nat. Rev. Gene.t 2006, 7:552-564.
7. Bailey J.A., Gu Z., Clark R.A., Reinert K., Samonte R.V., Schwartz S., Adams M.D., Myers E.W., Li P.W., Eichler E.E. Recent segmental duplications in the human genome. Science 2002, 297:1003-1007.
8. Bailey W.J., Kim J., Wagner G.P., Ruddle F.H. Phylogenetic reconstruction of vertebrate Hox cluster duplications. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1997, 14:843-853.
9. Cheng Z., Ventura M., She X., Khaitovich P., Graves T., Osoegawa K., Church D., DeJong P., Wilson R.K., Paabo S., Rocchi M., Eichler E.E. A genome-wide comparison of recent chimpanzee and human segmental duplications. Nature 2005, 437:88-93.
10. Diehn M., Sherlock G., Binkley G., Jin H., Matese J.C., Hernandez-Boussard T., Rees C.A., Cherry J.M., Botstein D., Brown P.O., Alizadeh A.A. SOURCE: a unified genomic resource of functional annotations, ontologies, and gene expression data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31:219-223.
11. Donoghue P.C., Purnell M.A. Genome duplication, extinction and vertebrate evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005, 20:312-319.
12. Felsentein J. Confidence limit on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39:95-105.
13. Furlong R.F., Holland P.W. Polyploidy in vertebrate ancestry: Ohno and beyond. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 2004, 82:425-430.
14. Furlong R.F., Holland P.W. Were vertebrates octoploid?. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 2002, 357(B):531-544.
15. Goode D.K., Snell P., Smith S.F., Cooke J.E., Elgar G. Highly conserved regulatory elements around the SHH gene may contribute to the maintenance of conserved synteny across human chromosome 7q36.3. Genomics 2005, 86:172-181.
16. Hokamp K., McLysaght A., Wolfe K.H. The 2R hypothesis and the human genome sequence. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 2003, 3:95-110.
17. Hubbard T., Barker D., Birney E., Cameron G., Chen Y., Clark L., Cox T., Cuff J., Curwen V., Down T., Durbin R., Eyras E., Gilbert J., Hammond M., Huminiecki L., Kasprzyk A., Lehvaslaiho H., Lijnzaad P., Melsopp C., Mongin E., Pettett R., Pocock M., Potter S., Rust A., Schmidt E., Searle S., Slater G., Smith J., Spooner W., Stabenau A., Stalker J., Stupka E., Ureta-Vidal A., Vastrik I., Clamp M. The Ensembl genome database project. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30:38-41.
18. Hughes A.L. Phylogenetic tests of the hypothesis of block duplication of homologous genes on human chromosomes 6, 9, and 1. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1998, 15:854-870.
19. Hughes A.L. Phylogenies of developmentally important proteins do not support the hypothesis of two rounds of genome duplication early in vertebrate history. J. Mol. Evol. 1999, 48:565-576.
20. Hughes A.L., da Silva J., Friedman R. Ancient genome duplications did not structure the human Hox-bearing chromosomes. Genome Res. 2001, 11:771-780.
21. Hughes A.L., Friedman R. 2R or not 2R: testing hypotheses of genome duplication in early vertebrates. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 2003, 3:85-93.
22. Johnson M., Zaretskaya I., Raytselis Y., Merezhuk Y., McGinnis S., Madden T.L. NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36:W5-9.
23. Kasahara M. The 2R hypothesis: an update. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2007, 19:547-552.
24. Kikuta H., Laplante M., Navratilova P., Komisarczuk A.Z., Engstrom P.G., Fredman D., Akalin A., Caccamo M., Sealy I., Howe K., Ghislain J., Pezeron G., Mourrain P., Ellingsen S., Oates A.C., Thisse C., Thisse B., Foucher I., Adolf B., Geling A., Lenhard B., Becker T.S. Genomic regulatory blocks encompass multiple neighboring genes and maintain conserved synteny in vertebrates. Genome Res. 2007, 17:545-555.
25. Larhammar D., Lundin L.G., Hallbook F. The human Hox-bearing chromosome regions did arise by block or chromosome (or even genome) duplications. Genome Res. 2002, 12:1910-1920.
26. Lee A.P., Koh E.G., Tay A., Brenner S., Venkatesh B. Highly conserved syntenic blocks at the vertebrate Hox loci and conserved regulatory elements within and outside Hox gene clusters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:6994-6999.
27. Lundin L.G., Larhammar D., Hallbook F. Numerous groups of chromosomal regional paralogies strongly indicate two genome doublings at the root of the vertebrates. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 2003, 3:53-63.
28. Marques-Bonet T., Girirajan S., Eichler E.E. The origins and impact of primate segmental duplications. Trends Genet. 2009, 25:443-454.
29. Martin A. Is tetralogy true? Lack of support for the " One-to-Four Rule" Mol. Biol. Evol. 2001, 18:89-93.
30. Martin A.P. Increasing genomic complexity by gene duplication and the origin of vertebrates. Am. Nat. 1999, 154:111-128.
31. McLysaght A., Hokamp K., Wolfe K.H. Extensive genomic duplication during early chordate evolution. Nat. Genet. 2002, 31:200-204.
32. Meaburn K.J., Misteli T. Cell biology: chromosome territories. Nature 2007, 445:379-781.
33. Ohno S. Evolution by Gene Duplication 1970, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
34. Ohno S. Ancient linkage groups and frozen accidents. Nature 1973, 244:259-262.
35. Russo C.A.M., Takezaki N., Nei M. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1996, 13:525-536.
36. Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4:406-425.
37. Samonte R.V., Eichler E.E. Segmental duplications and the evolution of the primate genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001, 3:65-72.
38. Skrabanek L., Wolfe K.H. Eukaryote genome duplication - where's the evidence?. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1998, 8:694-700.
39. Sundstrom G., Larsson T.A., Larhammar D. Phylogenetic and chromosomal analyses of multiple gene families syntenic with vertebrate Hox clusters. BMC Evol. Biol. 2009, 8:254.
40. Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G., Gibson T.J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22:4673-4680.
41. Van de peer Y. Computational approaches to unveiling ancient genome duplications. Nat. Rev. Gene 2004, 5:752-763.
42. Whelan S., Goldman N. A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2001, 18:691-699.
43. Zhang J., Nei M. Evolution of Antennapedia-class homeobox genes. Genetics 1996, 142:295-303.