An empirical mathematical model applied to quantitative evaluation of thioacetamide-induced acute liver injury in rats by use of dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography

Radiological Physics and Technology

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 115-120

  Murase, Kenya ^a   Kobayashi, Shuichiro ^a   Kitamura, Akihiro ^a   Matsushita, Taro ^a   Saito, Shigeyoshi ^a   Nishiura, Motoko ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Dynamic contrast enhanced CT; Empirical mathematical model; Rat; Thioacetamide induced acute liver injury

Indexed keywords

ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE; ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE; IOPAMIDOL; SODIUM CHLORIDE; THIOACETAMIDE;

ACUTE LIVER INJURY; ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE BLOOD LEVEL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE BLOOD LEVEL; COMPARTMENT MODEL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG ELIMINATION; DRUG HALF LIFE; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIVER INJURY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RAT;

ANIMALS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DRUG-INDUCED LIVER INJURY; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; THIOACETAMIDE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84873120515     PISSN: 18650333     EISSN: 18650341     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12194-012-0177-y     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bisdas S, Konstantinou G, Surlan-Popovic K, Khoshneviszadeh A, Baghi M, Vogl TJ, Koh TS, Mack MG. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of head and neck tumors: comparison of first-pass and permeability perfusion measurements using two different commercially available tracer kinetics models. Acad Radiol. 2008;15:1580-9.
2. Lazanyi KS, Abramyuk A, Wolf G, Tokalov S, Zophel K, Appold S, Herrmann T, Baumann M, Abolmaali N. Usefulness of dynamic contrast enhanced computed tomography in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer scheduled for radiation therapy. Lung Cancer. 2010;70:280-5.
3. Klauss M, Stiller W, Fritz F, Kieser M, Werner J, Kauczor HU, Grenacher L. Computed tomography perfusion analysis of pancreatic carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012;36:237-42.
4. Cyran CC, von Einem JC, Paprottka PM, Schwarz B, Ingrisch M, Dietrich O, Hinkel R, Bruns CJ, Clevert DA, Eschbach R, Reiser MF, Wintersperger BJ, Nikolaou K. Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging biomarkers correlated with immunohistochemistry for monitoring the effects of sorafenib on experimental prostate carcinomas. Invest Radiol. 2012;47:49-57.
5. Murase K, Miyazaki S, Yang X. An efficient method for calculating kinetic parameters in a dual-input single-compartment model. Br J Radiol. 2007;80:371-5.
6. Kobayashi S, Kitamura A, Matsushita T, Nishiura M, Murase K. Usefulness of a dual-input single-compartment model for quantitative evaluation of thioacetamide-induced acute liver injury in rats using dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Radiol Phys Technol. 2012;5:27-33.
7. Materne R, Van Beers BE, Smith AM, Leconte I, Jamart J, Dehoux JP, Keyeux A, Horsmans Y. Non-invasive quantification of liver perfusion with dynamic computed tomography and a dual input one-compartmental model. Clin Sci. 2000;99:517-25.
8. Miyazaki S, Murase K, Yoshikawa T, Morimoto S, Ohno Y, Sugimura K. A quantitative method for estimating hepatic blood flow using a dual-input single-compartment model. Br J Radiol. 2008;81:790-800.
9. Miyazaki S, Tachibana A, Kitamura A, Nagasawa A, Yamazaki Y, Murase K. Investigation on the optimal position for the quantification of hepatic perfusion by use of dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography in rats. Radiol Phys Technol. 2009;2:183-8.
10. Fan X, Medved M, River JN, Zamora M, Corot C, Robert P, Bourrinet P, Lipton M, Culp RM, Karczmar GS. New model for analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data distinguishes metastatic from nonmetastatic transplanted rodent prostate tumors. Magn Reson Med. 2004;51:487-94.
11. Fan X, Medved M, Karcamar GS, Yang C, Foxley S, Arkani S, Recant W, Zamora MA, Abe H, Newstead GM. Diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions using an empirical mathematical model for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:593-603.
12. Oto A, Fan X, Mustafi D, Jansen SA, Karczmar GS, Rubin DT, Kayhan A. Quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for assessment of bowel inflammation in Crohn's disease. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:1223-30.
13. Nelder JA, Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J. 1965;7:308-13.
14. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. Numerical recipes in C. 2nd ed. Oxford: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
15. Rahman TM, Hodgson HJF. Animal models of acute hepatic failure. Int J Exp Path. 2000;81:145-57.
16. Tunon MJ, Alvarez M, Culebras JM, Gonzalez-Gallego J. An overview of animal models for investigating the pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies in acute hepatic failure. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:3086-98.
17. Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, Evelhoch JL, Henderson E, Knopp MV, Larsson HB, Lee TY, Mayr NA, Parker GJ, Port RE, Taylor J, Weisskoff RM. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI of a diffusible tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:223-32.
18. Wintermark M, Maeder P, Verdun FR, Thiran J-P, Valley J-F, Schnyder P, Meuli R. Using 80 kVp versus 120 kVp in perfusion CT measurement of regional cerebral blood flow. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:1881-4.