A quantitative method for estimating hepatic blood flow using a dual-input single-compartment model

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 81, Issue 970, 2008, Pages 790-800

  Miyazaki, S ^a   Murase, K ^a,c   Yoshikawa, T ^b   Morimoto, S ^a   Ohno, Y ^b   Sugimura, K ^b  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b KOBE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^c OSAKA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IOPAMIDOL;

ADULT; AGED; AORTA; ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; ARTICLE; BLOOD; BLOOD FLOWMETRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; COMPARTMENT MODEL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DENSITY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HEPATIC ARTERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIVER; LIVER BLOOD FLOW; LIVER METASTASIS; LIVER VEIN; LUNG CANCER; MALE; PARAMETRIC TEST; PORTAL VEIN; PORTAL VEIN BLOOD FLOW; QUANTITATIVE ASSAY;

AGED; CARCINOMA, HEPATOCELLULAR; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HEPATIC ARTERY; HUMANS; LIVER; LIVER CIRCULATION; LIVER DISEASES; LIVER NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PORTAL VEIN; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 53749098967     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/52166324     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Van Beers BE, Leconte I, Materne R, Smith AM, Jamart J, Horsmans Y. Hepatic perfusion parameters in chronic liver disease: dynamic CT measurements correlated with disease severity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:667-73.
2. Pandharipande PV, Krinsky GA, Rusinek H, Lee VS. Perfusion imaging of the liver: current challenges and future goals. Radiology 2005;234:661-73.
3. Miles KA, Hayball MP, Dixon AK. Functional images of hepatic perfusion obtained with dynamic CT. Radiology 1993;188:405-ll.
4. Bader TR, Herneth AM, Blaicher W, Steininger R, Mühlbacher F, Lechner G, et al. Hepatic perfusion after liver transplantation: noninvasive measurement with dynamic single-section CT. Radiology 1998;209:129-34.
5. Materne R, Van Beers BE, Smith AM, Leconte I, Jamart J, Dehoux J-P, et al. Non-invasive quantification of liver perfusion with dynamic computed tomography and a dual input one-compartmental model. Clin Sci 2000;99:517-25.
6. Munk OL, Bass L, Roelsgaard K, Bender D, Hansen SB, Keiding S. Liver kinetics of glucose analogs measured in pigs by PET: importance of dual-input blood sampling. J Nucl Med 2001;42:795-801.
7. Leen E, Angerson WJ, Wotherspoon H, Moule B, Cook TG, McArdle CS. Detection of colorectal liver metastases: comparison of laparotomy, CT, US, and Doppler perfusion index and evaluation of postoperative follow-up results. Radiology 1995;195:113-6.
8. Anderson H, Price P. Clinical measurement of blood flow in tumours using positron emission tomography: a review. Nucl Med Commun 2002;23:131-8.
9. Ruotsalainen U, Raitakari M, Nuutila P, Oikonen V, Sipilä H, Teräs M, et al. Quantitative blood flow measurement of skeletal muscle using oxygen-15-water and PET. J Nucl Med 1997;38:314-9.
10. Kiessling F, Boese J, Corvinus C, Ederle JR, Zuna I, Schoenberg SO, et al. Perfusion CT in patients with advanced bronchial carcinomas: a novel chance for characterization and treatment monitoring? Eur Radiol 2004;14:1226-33.
11. Delorme S, Knopp MV. Non-invasive vascular imaging: assessing tumour vascularity. Eur Radiol 1998;8:517-27.
12. Cuenod CA, Leconte I, Slauve N, Resten A, Dromain C, Poulet B, et al. Early changes in liver perfusion caused by occult metastases in rats: detection with quantitative CT. Radiology 2001;218:556-61.
13. Materne R, Annet L, Dechambre S, Sempoux C, Smith AM, Corot C, et al. Dynamic computed tomography with lowand high-molecular-mass contrast agents to assess microvascular permeability modifications in a model of liver fibrosis. Clin Sci 2002;103:213-6.
14. Blomley MJK, Coulden R, Dawson P, Kormano M, Donlan P, Bufkin C, et al. Liver perfusion studied with ultrafast CT. J Comp Assist Tomogr 1995;19:424-33.
15. Murase K, Miyazaki S, Yang X. An efficient method for calculating kinetic parameters in a dual-input singlecompartment model. Br J Radiol 2007;80:371-5.
16. Murase K. Efficient method for calculating kinetic parameters using T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:858-62.
17. Murase K, Kikuchi K, Miki H, Shimizu T, Ikezoe J. Determination of arterial input function using fuzzy clustering for quantification of cerebral blood flow with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:797-806.
18. Murase K, Nanjo T, Ii S, Miyazaki S, Hirata M, Sugawara Y, et al. Effect of X-ray tube current on the accuracy of cerebral perfusion parameters obtained by CT perfusion studies. Phys Med Biol 2005;50:5019-29.
19. Wintermark M, Maeder P, Verdun FR, Thiran J-P, Valley J-F, Schnyder P, et al. Using 80 kVp versus 120 kVp in perfusion CT measurement of regional cerebral blood flow. Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1881-4.
20. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. Numerical recipes in C. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1992.