Plant invasions and extinction debts

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1744-1749

  Gilbert, Benjamin ^a,b   Levine, Jonathan M ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Invasive species; Metacommunity; Metapopulation; Spatial ecology; Temporal lag

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; GRASS; LANDSCAPE; METAPOPULATION; PLANT; PLANT COMMUNITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEED PRODUCTION; SPECIES EXTINCTION; SPECIES INVASION; SPECIES REFUGE;

ALGORITHMS; CALIFORNIA; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EXTINCTION, BIOLOGICAL; GEOGRAPHY; INTRODUCED SPECIES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANT PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; POACEAE; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 84873113339     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1212375110     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Sax DF, Gaines SD (2008) Colloquium paper: Species invasions and extinction: The future of native biodiversity on islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(Suppl 1):11490-11497.
2. Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E (1998) Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48(8):607-615.
3. Gurevitch J, Padilla DK (2004) Are invasive species a major cause of extinctions? Trends Ecol Evol 19(9):470-474. (Pubitemid 39151666)
4. Sax DF, Gaines SD, Brown JH (2002) Species invasions exceed extinctions on islands worldwide: A comparative study of plants and birds. Am Nat 160(6):766-783. (Pubitemid 36035855)
5. Sax DF, et al. (2007) Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 22(9):465-471. (Pubitemid 47223492)
6. Davis MA, et al. (2011) Don't judge species on their origins. Nature 474(7350):153-154.
7. Hobbs RJ, Mooney HA (1998) Broadening the extinction debate: Population deletions and additions in California and Western Australia. Conserv Biol 12(2):271-283. (Pubitemid 28202789)
8. Huenneke LF, Hamburg SP, Koide R, Mooney HA, Vitousek PM (1990) Effects of soil resources on plant invasion and community structure in Californian serpentine grassland. Ecology 71(2):478-491. (Pubitemid 20428097)
9. Seabloom EW, et al. (2003) Competition, seed limitation, disturbance, and reestablishment of California native annual forbs. Ecol Appl 13(3):575-592. (Pubitemid 38012506)
10. Daehler CC (2003) Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: Implications for conservation and restoration. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:183-211. (Pubitemid 38171418)
11. MacDougall AS, Turkington R (2006) Dispersal, competition, and shifting patterns of diversity in a degraded oak savanna. Ecology 87(7):1831-1843. (Pubitemid 44141559)
12. Hanski I (1994) Patch-occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes. Trends Ecol Evol 9(4):131-135.
13. Hanski I, Ovaskainen O (2000) The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404(6779):755-758. (Pubitemid 30212401)
14. Ovaskainen O, Hanski I (2001) Spatially structured metapopulation models: Global and local assessment of metapopulation capacity. Theor Popul Biol 60(4):281-302. (Pubitemid 34271304)
15. Vellend M, et al. (2006) Extinction debt of forest plants persists for more than a century following habitat fragmentation. Ecology 87(3):542-548.
16. Kuussaari M, et al. (2009) Extinction debt: A challenge for biodiversity conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 24(10):564-571.
17. Malanson GP (2008) Extinction debt: Origins, developments, and applications of a biogeographical trope. Prog Phys Geogr 32:277-291.
18. Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65-66. (Pubitemid 24277463)
19. Gram WK, et al. (2004) Distribution of plants in a California serpentine grassland: Are rocky hummocks spatial refuges for native species? Plant Ecol 172(2):159-171. (Pubitemid 39001380)
20. Safford H, Viers J, Harrison S (2005) Serpentine endemism in the California flora: A database of serpentine affinity. Madrono 52(4):222-257.
21. Thomson FJ, Moles AT, Auld TD, Kingsford RT (2011) Seed dispersal distance is more strongly correlated with plant height than with seed mass. J Ecol 99(6):1299-1307.
22. Hanski I (1994) A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J Anim Ecol 63(1):151-162.
23. Seabloom EW, Harpole WS, Reichman OJ, Tilman D (2003) Invasion, competitive dominance, and resource use by exotic and native California grassland species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(23):13384-13389. (Pubitemid 37444751)
24. Keeley JE (1990) Endangered Plant Communities of Southern California, ed Schoenherr AA (Southern California Botanists, Fullerton, CA), pp 2-23.
25. Wolf A (2001) Conservation of endemic plants in serpentine landscapes. Biol Conserv 100(1):35-44. (Pubitemid 32602330)
26. Harrison S, Maron J, Huxel G (2000) Regional turnover and fluctuation in populations of five pants confined to serpentine seeps. Conserv Biol 14(3):769-779. (Pubitemid 30390733)
27. Hanski I (1982) Dynamics of regional distribution: The core and satellite species hypothesis. Oikos 38(2):210-221.
28. Scheiner SM, Rey-Benayas JM (1997) Placing empirical limits on metapopulation models for terrestrial plants. Evol Ecol 11(3):275-288.
29. Gaggiotti O, Hanski I (2004) Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution of Metapopulations, eds Hanski I, Gaggiotti O (Academic, San Diego), pp 337-366.
30. Pachepsky E, Levine JM (2011) Density dependence slows invader spread in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat 177(1):18-28.
31. Bell G, Gonzalez A (2011) Adaptation and evolutionary rescue in metapopulations experiencing environmental deterioration. Science 332(6035):1327-1330.