Regional turnover and fluctuation in populations of five plants confined to serpentine seeps

Conservation Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 769-779

  Harrison, Susan ^a   Maron, John ^b   Huxel, Gary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POPULATION DYNAMICS; SERPENTINE; SPATIAL VARIATION; TURNOVER;

EID: 0034080337     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98478.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Brooks, R. R. 1987. Serpentine and its vegetation: a multidisciplinary approach. Dioscorides Press, Portland, Oregon.
2. Callizo, J. 1992. Serpentine habitats for the rare plants of Lake, Napa and Yolo Counties, California. Pages 35-51 in A. J. M. Baker, J. Proctor, and R. D. Reeves, editors. The vegetation of ultramafic (serpentine) soils. Intercept Limited, Andover, United Kingdom.
3. Cliff, A. D., and J. K. Ord. 1981. Spatial processes: models and applications. Pion Limited, London.
4. D'Appolonia Company. 1982. McLaughlin project: proposed gold mine and mineral extraction facility, Homestake Mining Company. Environmental report. D'Appolonia Company, San Francisco, California.
5. Erikkson, O. 1996. Regional dynamics of plants: a review of evidence for remnant, source-sink, and metapopulations. Oikos 77:248-258.
6. Fox, K. P., J. D. Sims, J. A. Barlow, and E. J. Helley. 1973. Preliminary geologic map of eastern Sonoma and western Napa Counties, California. United States Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado.
7. Groom, M. J. 1998. Allee effects limit population viability of an annual plant. American Naturalist 151:487-496.
8. Hanski, I. 1997. Metapopulation dynamics: from concepts and observations to predictive models. Pages 69-91 in I. Hanski and M. Gilpin, editors. Metapopulation dynamics: ecology, genetics and evolution Academic Press, New York.
9. Hanski, I., and D. Simberloff. 1997. The metapopulatlon approach, its history, conceptual domain, and application to conservation. Pages 5-26 in I. Hanski and M. Gilpin, editors. Metapopulation dynamics: ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic Press, New York.
10. Harrison, S. 1997. How natural habitat patchiness affects the distribution of diversity in Californian serpentine chaparral. Ecology 78: 1898-1906.
11. Harrison, S. 1999. Local and regional diversity in a patchy landscape: native, alien and endemic herbs on serpentine. Ecology 80:70-80.
12. Harrison, S., and J. F. Quinn. 1989. Correlated environments and the persistence of metapopulations. Oikos 56:293-298.
13. Harrison, S., and A. D. Taylor. 1997. Empirical evidence for metapopulation dynamics. Pages 27-42 in I. Hanski and M. Gilpin, editors. Metapopulation dynamics: ecology, genetics and evolution. Academic Press, New York.
14. Hickman, J. C. 1993. The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley.
15. Husband, B. C., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1996. A metapopulation perspective in plant population biology. Journal of Ecology 84:461-469.
16. Isaaks, E. H., and R. M. Srivastava. 1989. An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York.
17. Jain, S. K., R. Kesseli, and A. Olivieri. 1992. Biosystematic status of the serpentine sunflower, Helianthus exilis Gray. Pages 391-408 in A. J. M. Baker, J. Proctor, and R. D. Reeves, editors. The vegetation of ultramafic (serpentine) soils. Intercept Limited, Andover, United Kingdom.
18. Koenigs, R. L., W. A. Williams, M. B. Jones, and A. Wallace. 1982. Factors affecting vegetation on serpentine soil. I. Principal components analysis of vegetation data. Hilgardia 50(4):1-14.
19. Kruckeberg, A. R. 1984. California serpentines: flora, vegetation, geology, soils and management problems. University of California Press, Berkeley.
20. McNair, M. 1992. Preliminary studies on the genetics and evolution of the serpentine endemic Mimulus nudatus Curran. Pages 409-419 in A. J. M. Baker, J. Proctor, and R. D. Reeves, editors. The vegetation of ultramafic (serpentine) soils. Intercept Limited, Andover, United Kingdom.
21. Menges, E. S. 1990. Population viability analysis for an endangered plant. Conservation Biology 4:52-62.
22. Ouborg, N. J. 1993. Isolation, population size and extinction: the classical and metapopulation approaches applied to vascular plants along the Dutch Rhine system. Oikos 66:298-308.
23. Quintana-Ascensio, P. P., and E. S. Menges. 1996. Inferring metapopulation dynamics from patch-level incidence of Florida scrub plants. Conservation Biology 10:1210-1219.
24. Sawyer, J. O., and T. Keeler-Wolf. 1995. A manual of California vegetation. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento.
25. Silvertown, J. 1991. Dorothy's dilemma and the unification of plant population biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6:346-348.
26. Sjogren Gulve, P. 1994. Distribution and extinction patterns within a northern metapopulation of the pool frog Rana lessonae. Ecology 75:1357-1367.
27. Skinner, M. W., and B. M. Pavlik. 1994. California Native Plant Society's inventory of rare and endangered plants of California. Special publication 1. 5th edition. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento.
28. Smith, J. P., Jr. 1981. Inventory of rare and endangered vascular plants of California. First supplement. Special publication 1. 2nd edition. California Native Plant Society, Berkeley.
29. Sokal, R. R. and N. L. Oden. 1978a. Spatial autocorrelation in biology. I. Methodology. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 10:199-228.
30. Sokal, R. R. and N. L. Oden. 1978b. Spatial autocorrelation in biology. II. Some biological implications and applications of evolutionary and ecological interest. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 10:229-249.
31. Thomas, C. D., and I. Hanski. 1997. Butterfly metapopulations. Pages 359-386 in I. Hanski and M. Gilpin, editors. Metapopulation dynamics: ecology, genetics and evolution. Academic Press, New York.
32. Wagner, D. L., and E. J. Bortugno. 1982. Geologic map of the Santa Rosa Quadrangle. California, 1:250,000. State of California Resources Agency, Sacramento.
33. Waser, N. M., R. K. Vickery Jr., and M. V. Price. 1982. Patterns of seed dispersal and population differentiation in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 36:753-761.