Solvated protein-protein docking using Kyte-Doolittle-based water preferences

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 81, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 510-518

  Kastritis, Panagiotis L ^a   Visscher, Koen M ^a   van Dijk, Aalt D J ^b   Bonvin, Alexandre M J J ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Explicit water; Kyte Doolittle hydrophobicity scale; Macromolecular docking; Protein protein interactions; Structure

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; WATER;

ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEHYDRATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SOLVATION; STATISTICS;

AMINO ACIDS; ANTIGEN-ANTIBODY COMPLEX; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; ENZYME INHIBITORS; HYDROGEN BONDING; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; WATER;

EID: 84873087089     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24210     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Levy Y, Onuchic JN. Water mediation in protein folding and molecular recognition. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2006; 35: 389-415.
2. Ball P. Water as an active constituent in cell biology. Chem Rev 2008; 108: 74-108.
3. Hartl FU, Hayer-Hartl M. Converging concepts of protein folding in vitro and in vivo. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2009; 16: 574-581.
4. Zhang L, Yang Y, Kao YT, Wang L, Zhong D. Protein hydration dynamics and molecular mechanism of coupled water-protein fluctuations. J Am Chem Soc 2009; 131: 10677-10691.
5. Grossman M, Born B, Heyden M, Tworowski D, Fields GB, Sagi I, Havenith M. Correlated structural kinetics and retarded solvent dynamics at the metalloprotease active site. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011; 18: 1102-1108.
6. Mentré P. Water in the orchestration of the cell machinery. Some misunderstandings: a short review. J Biol Phys 2012; 38: 13-26.
7. Janin J. Wet and dry interfaces: the role of solvent in protein-protein and protein-DNA recognition. Structure 1999; 7: R277-R279.
8. Huber R, Kukla D, Bode W, Schwager P, Bartels K, Deisenhofer J, Steigemann W. Structure of the complex formed by bovine trypsin and bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. II. Crystallographic refinement at 1.9 A resolution. J Mol Biol 1974; 89: 73-101.
9. Perkins JR, Diboun I, Dessailly BH, Lees JG, Orengo C. Transient protein-protein interactions: structural, functional, and network properties. Structure 2010; 18: 1233-1243.
10. Vidal M, Cusick ME, Barabasi AL. Interactome networks and human disease. Cell 2011; 144: 986-998.
11. Mullard A. Protein-protein interaction inhibitors get into the groove. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2012; 11: 173-175.
12. van Dijk AD, Boelens R, Bonvin AM. Data-driven docking for the study of biomolecular complexes. FEBS J 2005; 272: 293-312.
13. Dominguez C, Boelens R, Bonvin AM. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. J Am Chem Soc 2003; 125: 1731-1737.
14. van Dijk AD, Bonvin AM. Solvated docking: introducing water into the modelling of biomolecular complexes. Bioinformatics 2006; 22: 2340-2347.
15. Kastritis PL, van Dijk AD, Bonvin AM. Explicit treatment of water molecules in data-driven protein-protein docking: the solvated HADDOCKing approach. Methods Mol Biol 2012; 819: 355-374.
16. Kyte J, Doolittle RF. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol 1982; 157: 105-132.
17. Chothia C. The nature of the accessible and buried surfaces in proteins. J Mol Biol 1976; 105: 1-12.
18. Jorgensen WL. Quantum and statistical mechanical studies of liquids. 10. Transferable intermolecular potential functions for water, alcohols, and ethers. Application to liquid water. J Am Chem Soc 1981; 103: 335-340.
19. Rodier F, Bahadur RP, Chakrabarti P, Janin J. Hydration of protein-protein interfaces. Proteins 2005; 60: 36-45.
20. de Vries SJ, van Dijk M, Bonvin AM. The HADDOCK web serverfor data-driven biomolecular docking. Nat Protoc 2010; 5: 883-897.
21. Keskin O, Tsai CJ, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. A new, structurally nonredundant, diverse data set of protein-protein interfaces and its implications. Protein Sci 2004; 13: 1043-1055.
22. Wolfenden RV, Cullis PM, Southgate CC. Water, protein folding, and the genetic code. Science 1979; 206: 575-577.
23. Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Docking and scoring protein interactions: CAPRI 2009. Proteins 2009; 78: 3073-3084.
24. de Vries SJ, van Dijk AD, Krzeminski M, van Dijk M, Thureau A, Hsu V, Wassenaar T, Bonvin AM. HADDOCK versus HADDOCK: new features and performance of HADDOCK2.0 on the CAPRI targets. Proteins 2007; 69: 726-733.
25. Papoian GA, Ulander J, Wolynes PG. Role of water mediated interactions in protein-protein recognition landscapes. J Am Chem Soc 2003; 125: 9170-9178.
26. Levy Y, Onuchic JN. Water and proteins: a love-hate relationship. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101: 3325-3326.
27. Eisenberg D, Schwarz E, Komaromy M, Wall R. Analysis of membrane and surface protein sequences with the hydrophobic moment plot. J Mol Biol 1984; 179: 125-142.
28. Rose GD, Geselowitz AR, Lesser GJ, Lee RH, Zehfus MH. Hydrophobicity of amino acid residues in globular proteins. Science 1985; 229: 834-838.
29. Janin J. Surface and inside volumes in globular proteins. Nature 1979; 277: 491-492.
30. Engelman DM, Steitz TA, Goldman A. Identifying nonpolar transbilayer helices in amino acid sequences of membrane proteins. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 1986; 15: 321-353.
31. Chen J, Brooks CL, 3rd, Khandogin J. Recent advances in implicit solvent-based methods for biomolecular simulations. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2008; 18: 140-148.
32. Sousa SF, Fernandes PA, Ramos MJ. Protein-ligand docking: current status and future challenges. Proteins 2006; 65: 15-26.
33. Lie MA, Thomsen R, Pedersen CN, Schiott B, Christensen MH. Molecular docking with ligand attached water molecules. J Chem Inf Model 2011; 51: 909-917.
34. de Beer SB, Vermeulen NP, Oostenbrink C. The role of water molecules in computational drug design. Curr Top Med Chem 2010; 10: 55-66.
35. Davis AM, Teague SJ, Kleywegt GJ. Application and limitations of X-ray crystallographic data in structure-based ligand and drug design. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2003; 42: 2718-2736.
36. Waszkowycz B, Clark DE, Gancia E. Outstanding challenges in protein-ligand docking and structure-based virtual screening. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2011; 1: 229-259.
37. Forli S, Olson AJ. A force field with discrete displaceable waters and desolvation entropy for hydrated ligand docking. J Med Chem 2012; 55: 623-638.
38. Verdonk ML, Chessari G, Cole JC, Hartshorn MJ, Murray CW, Nissink JW, Taylor RD, Taylor R. Modeling water molecules in protein-ligand docking using GOLD. J Med Chem 2005; 48: 6504-6515.