Social categorization and group-motivated interindividual-intergroup discontinuity

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 40-49

  Böhm, Robert ^a   Rothermund, Klaus ^b   Kirchkamp, Oliver ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERFURT   (Germany)

^b FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873080343     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.1923     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Billig, M., & Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 27-52.
2. Bornstein, G. (2008). A classification of games by player type. In A. Biel, D. Eek, T. Gärling, & M. Gustafsson (Eds.), New issues and paradigms in research on social dilemmas (pp. 27-42). Berlin: Springer.
3. Bornstein, G., & Yaniv, I. (1998). Individual and group behavior in the ultimatum game: Are groups more 'rational' players? Experimental Economics, 1, 101-108.
4. Bornstein, G., Kugler, T., & Ziegelmeyer, A. (2004). Individual and group decisions in the centipede game: Are groups more 'rational' players?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 599-605.
5. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
6. Brewer, M., & Kramer, R. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543-549.
7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Cohen, T. R., Montoya, R. M., & Insko, C. A. (2006). Group morality and intergroup relations: Cross-cultural and experimental evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1559-1572.
9. De Cremer, D., & Van Vugt, M. (1999). Social identification effects in social dilemmas: A transformation of motives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 871-893.
10. Demoulin, S., & Teixeira, C. P. (2010). Social categorization in interpersonal negotiations. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13, 765-777.
11. Drigotas S. M., Insko C. A., & Schopler J. (1998) Mere categorization and competition: A closer look at social identity theory and the discontinuity effect. In J.-D. Deschamps, S. Worchel, D. Paez, & J. F. Morales (Eds.), Social identity: International perspectives (pp. 180-198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
12. Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10, 171-178.
13. Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239-249.
14. Greiner, B. (2004). An online recruitment system for economic experiments. In K. Kremer, & V. Macho (Eds), Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen 2003. GWDG Bericht 63 (pp. 79-93). Göttingen: Ges. fr Wiss. Datenverarbeitung.
15. Grieve, P. G., & Hogg, M. A. (1999). Subjective uncertainty and intergroup discrimination in the minimal group situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 926-940.
16. Haslam, S. A. (2004). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage Publications, Inc..
17. Hogg, M. A., Abrams, D., Otten, S., & Hinkle, S. (2004). The social identity perspective: Intergroup relations, self-conception, and small groups. Small Group Research, 35, 246-276.
18. Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 204-222.
19. Insko, C., Hoyle, R. H., Pinkley, R. L., Hong, G.-Y., Slim, R. M., Dalton, B., ... Schopler, J. (1988). Individual-group discontinuity: The role of a consensus rule. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 505-519.
20. Insko, C. A., Kirchner, J. L., Pinter, B., Efaw, J., & Wildschut, T. (2005). Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity as a function of trust and categorization: The paradox of expected cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 365-385.
21. Insko, C. A., Pinkley, R. L., Hoyle, R. H., Dalton, B., Hong, G., Slim, R. M., ... Thibaut, J. (1987). Individual versus group discontinuity: The role of intergroup contact. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 250-267.
22. Insko, C. A., Schopler, J., Gaertner, L., Wildschut, T., Kozar, R., Pinter, B., ... Montoya, M. R. (2001). Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity reduction through the anticipation of future interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 95-111.
23. Insko, C. A., Schopler, J., Graetz, K. A., Drigotas, S. M., Currey, D. P., Smith, S. L., ... Bornstein, G. (1994). Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity in the prisoner's dilemma game. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38, 87-116.
24. Insko, C. A., Schopler, J., Hoyle, R. H., Dardis, G. J., & Graetz, K. A. (1990). Individual - group discontinuity as a function of fear and greed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 68-79.
25. Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602-619.
26. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
27. Kocher, M. G., & Sutter, M. (2005). The decision maker matters: Individual versus group behaviour in experimental beauty-contest games. The Economic Journal, 115, 200-223.
28. Kollock, P. (1998). Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 183-214.
29. McCallum, D. M., Harring, K., Gilmore, R., Drenan, S., Chase, J. P., Insko, C. A., & Thibaut, J. (1985). Competition and cooperation between groups and between individuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 301-320.
30. Messick, D. M., & Sentis, K. P. (1985). Estimating social and nonsocial utility functions from ordinal data. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 389-399.
31. Messick, D. M., Moore, D. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (1997). Ultimatum bargaining with a committee: Underestimating the importance of decision rule. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 87-101.
32. Oakes, P. J. (1987). The salience of social categories. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 117-141). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
33. Oakes, P., & Turner, J. C. (1986). Distinctiveness and the salience of social category memberships: Is there an automatic perceptual bias towards novelty? European Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 325-344.
34. Pinter, B., & Wildschut, T. (2011). Self-interest masquerading as ingroup beneficence: Altruistic rationalization and interindividual-intergroup discontinuity. Small Group Research, 43, 105-123.
35. Pinter, B., Insko, C. A., Wildschut, T., Kirchner, J. L., Montoya, R. M., & Wolf, S. T. (2007). Reduction of interindividual-intergroup discontinuity: The role of leader accountability and proneness to guilt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 250-265.
36. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
37. Schelling, T. C. 1960. The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Schopler, J., Insko, C. A., Drigotas, S. M., & Wieselquist, J. (1995). The role of identifiability in the reduction of interindividual-intergroup discontinuity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 553-574.
39. Schopler, J., Insko, C. A., Graetz, K. A., Drigotas, S., Smith, V. A., & Dahl, K. (1993). Individual-group discontinuity: Further evidence for mediation by fear and greed. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 419-431.
40. Tajfel, H. (1981) Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
42. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel, & W. Austin (Eds), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
43. Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
44. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
45. Trötschel, R., Hüffmeier, J., & Loschelder, D. D. (2010). When yielding pieces of the pie is not a piece of cake: Identity-based intergroup effects in negotiations. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 741-763.
46. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
47. Wildschut, T., & Insko, C. A. (2007). Explanations of interindividual-intergroup discontinuity: A review of the evidence. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewestone (Eds.), European review of social psychology, Vol. 18 (pp. 175-211). Oxford England: John Wiley & Sons.
48. Wildschut, T., Insko, C. A., & Gaertner, L. (2002). Intragroup social influence and intergroup competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 975-992.
49. Wildschut, T., Lodewijkx, H., & Insko, C. A. (2001). Toward a reconciliation of diverging perspectives on interindividual-group discontinuity: The role of procedural interdependence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 273-285.
50. Wildschut, T., Pinter, B., Vevea, J. L., Insko, C. A., & Schopler, J. (2003). Beyond the group mind: A quantitative review of the interindividual-intergroup discontinuity effect. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 698-722.
51. Wolf, S. T., Cohen, T. R., Kirchner, J. L., Rea, A., Montoya, R. M., & Insko, C. A. (2009). Reducing intergroup conflict through the consideration of future consequences. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 831-841.
52. Wolf, S. T., Insko, C. A., Kirchner, J. L., & Wildschut, T. (2008). Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity in the domain of correspondent outcomes: The roles of relativistic concern, perceived categorization, and the doctrine of mutual assured destruction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 479-494.