Nanoproteomics: A new sprout from emerging links between nanotechnology and proteomics

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 99-107

  Jia, Lee ^a   Lu, Yusheng ^a   Shao, Jingwei ^a   Liang, Xing Jie ^b   Xu, Yan ^c  

^a FUZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NATIONAL CENTER FOR NANOSCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon nanotubes; Gold nanoparticles; Nanofluidics; Nanomaterials; Nanoproteomics; Nanostructured surface

Indexed keywords

GOLD NANOPARTICLES; HIGH-THROUGHPUT; INDIVIDUAL PROTEINS; LOW-ABUNDANCE PROTEINS; NANOPROTEOMICS; NANOSTRUCTURED SURFACE; PEPTIDE MASS FINGERPRINT; PROTEOMICS; PROTEOMICS RESEARCH; REPRODUCIBILITIES; SAMPLE CONSUMPTION; SURFACE-TO-VOLUME RATIO;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CARBON NANOTUBES; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NANOFLUIDICS; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS;

PROTEINS;

CARBON NANOTUBE; COPOLYMER NANOPARTICLE; DIAMOND NANOPARTICLE; GOLD NANOPARTICLE; MAGNETIC NANOPARTICLE; NANOMATERIAL; POLYMERIC NANOPARTICLE; SILICA NANOPARTICLE; SILVER NANOPARTICLE; TITANIUM DIOXIDE NANOCRYSTAL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZIRCONIUM DIOXIDE NANOPARTICLE;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; NANOANALYSIS; NANOFLUIDICS; NANOPROTEOMICS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; SURFACE PROPERTY;

HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS; LIMIT OF DETECTION; MICROFLUIDICS; NANOSTRUCTURES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NANOTUBES, CARBON; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84872817703     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.11.010     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Xu Y., et al. Porous polymer monolithic column with surface-bound gold nanoparticles for the capture and separation of cysteine-containing peptides. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82:3352-3358.
2. O'Farrell P.H. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1975, 250:4007-4021.
3. Righetti P.G. Bioanalysis: its past, present, and some future. Electrophoresis 2004, 25:2111-2127.
4. Peterson D.S., et al. Dual-function microanalytical device by in situ photolithographic grafting of porous polymer monolith: integrating solid-phase extraction and enzymatic digestion for peptide mass mapping. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75:5328-5335.
5. Geiser L., et al. In-line system containing porous polymer monoliths for protein digestion with immobilized pepsin, peptide preconcentration and nano-liquid chromatography separation coupled to electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1188:88-96.
6. Archakov A.I., et al. AFM fishing nanotechnology is the way to reverse the Avogadro number in proteomics. Proteomics 2007, 7:4-9.
7. Chandra H., Srivastava S. Cell-free synthesis-based protein microarrays and their applications. Proteomics 2010, 10:717-730.
8. Wepf A., et al. Quantitative interaction proteomics using mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2009, 6:203-205.
9. Liao L., et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of primary neurons reveals diverse changes in synaptic protein content in fmr1 knockout mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:15281-15286.
10. Matsuoka S., et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 2007, 316:1160-1166.
11. Jia L., et al. S-nitrosohaemoglobin: a dynamic activity of blood involved in vascular control. Nature 1996, 380:221-226.
12. Simon D.I., et al. Polynitrosylated proteins: characterization, bioactivity, and functional consequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93:4736-4741.
13. Jia L., et al. Pharmacoproteomic effects of isoniazid, ethambutol, and N-geranyl-N'-(2-adamantyl)ethane-1,2-diamine (SQ109) on Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2005, 315:905-911.
14. Bell A.W., et al. A HUPO test sample study reveals common problems in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Methods 2009, 6:423-430.
15. Stevens T.S., Langhorst M.A. Agglomerated pellicular anion exchange columns for ion chromatography. Anal. Chem. 1982, 54:950-953.
16. Jia L. Nanoparticle formulation increases oral bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs: approaches experimental evidences and theory. Curr. Nanosci. 2005, 1:237-243.
17. Liang X.J., et al. Biopharmaceutics and therapeutic potential of engineered nanomaterials. Curr. Drug Metab. 2008, 9:697-709.
18. Benes M.J., et al. Methacrylate-based chromatographic media. J. Sep. Sci. 2005, 28:1855-1875.
19. Nilsson C., et al. Use of nanoparticles in capillary and microchip electrochromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1168:212-224.
20. Cintron J.M., Colon L.A. Organo-silica nano-particles used in ultrahigh-pressure liquid chromatography. Analyst 2002, 127:701-704.
21. Cristea I.M., et al. Fluorescent proteins as proteomic probes. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4:1933-1941.
22. Qu Q.S., et al. Gold microspheres modified with octadecanethiol for capillary liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1198-1199:95-100.
23. Zhong Z., et al. More recent progress in the preparation of Au nanostructures, properties, and applications. Anal. Lett. 2003, 36:3097-3118.
24. Wang A., et al. Gold nanoparticle-assisted protein enrichment and electroelution for biological samples containing low protein concentration-a prelude of gel electrophoresis. J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5:1488-1492.
25. Liu T., et al. High-throughput comparative proteome analysis using a quantitative cysteinyl-peptide enrichment technology. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76:5345-5353.
26. Mukhopadhyay K., et al. Gold nanoparticles assembled on amine-functionalized Na-Y zeolite: a biocompatible surface for enzyme immobilization. Langmuir 2003, 19:3858-3863.
27. Gygi S.P., et al. Proteome analysis of low-abundance proteins using multidimensional chromatography and isotope-coded affinity tags. J. Proteome Res. 2002, 1:47-54.
28. Wang S., Regnier F.E. Proteomics based on selecting and quantifying cysteine containing peptides by covalent chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2001, 924:345-357.
29. Ijima S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 1991, 354:56-58.
30. Wei B.Q., et al. Microfabrication technology: organized assembly of carbon nanotubes. Nature 2002, 416:495-496.
31. Dai H. Carbon nanotubes: opportunities and challenges. Surf. Sci. 2002, 500:218-241.
32. Bahr J.L., et al. Functionalization of carbon nanotubes by electrochemical reduction of aryl diazonium salts: a bucky paper electrode. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123:6536-6542.
33. Wildgoose G.G., et al. Chemically modified carbon nanotubes for use in electroanalysis. Microchim. Acta 2006, 152:187-214.
34. He P., et al. Applications of carbon nanotubes in electrochemical DNA biosensors. Microchim. Acta 2006, 152:175-186.
35. Wang J. Carbon-nanotube based electrochemical biosensors: a review. Electroanalysis 2005, 17:7-14.
36. Merkoçi A., et al. New materials for electrochemical sensing VI: carbon nanotubes. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2005, 24:826-838.
37. Gooding J.J. Nanostructuring electrodes with carbon nanotubes: A review on electrochemistry and applications for sensing. Electrochim. Acta 2005, 50:3049-3060.
38. Valcarcel M., et al. Role of carbon nanotubes in analytical science. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79:4788-4797.
39. Katz E., Willner I. Biomolecule-functionalized carbon nanotubes: applications in nanobioelectronics. Chemphyschem 2004, 5:1084-1104.
40. Chen R.J., et al. Noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes for highly specific electronic biosensors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:4984-4989.
41. Dyke C.A., Tour J.M. Covalent functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes for materials applications. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108:11151-11159.
42. Li Y., et al. Incorporation of single-wall carbon nanotubes into an organic polymer monolithic stationary phase for mu-HPLC and capillary electrochromatography. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77:1398-1406.
43. Ugarov M.V., et al. MALDI matrices for biomolecular analysis based on functionalized carbon nanomaterials. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76:6734-6742.
44. Chen W.Y., et al. Carbon nanotubes as affinity probes for peptides and proteins in MALDI MS analysis. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 15:1629-1635.
45. Li X., et al. Enrichment of peptides from plasma for peptidome analysis using multiwalled carbon nanotubes. J. Sep. Sci. 2007, 30:930-943.
46. Johnson C.J., et al. Proteomics, nanotechnology and molecular diagnostics. Proteomics 2008, 8:715-730.
47. Gaspari M., et al. Nanoporous surfaces as harvesting agents for mass spectrometric analysis of peptides in human plasma. J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5:1261-1266.
48. Geho D., et al. Pegylated, streptavidin-conjugated quantum dots are effective detection elements for reverse-phase protein microarrays. Bioconjug. Chem. 2005, 16:559-566.
49. Fu J., et al. A nanofilter array chip for fast gel-free biomolecule separation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 87:263902.
50. Zeng Y., Harrison D.J. Self-assembled colloidal arrays as three-dimensional nanofluidic sieves for separation of biomolecules on microchips. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79:2289-2295.
51. Jokerst J.V., et al. Nano-bio-chips for high performance multiplexed protein detection: determinations of cancer biomarkers in serum and saliva using quantum dot bioconjugate labels. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2009, 24:3622-3629.
52. Natarajan S., et al. Optimal conditions for protein array deposition using continuous flow. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80:8561-8567.
53. Natarajan S., et al. Continuous-flow microfluidic printing of proteins for array-based applications including surface plasmon resonance imaging. Anal. Biochem. 2008, 373:141-146.
54. Fu J., et al. A patterned anisotropic nanofluidic sieving structure for continuous-flow separation of DNA and proteins. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2:121-128.
55. Austin R. Nanofluidics: a fork in the nano-road. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2:79-80.
56. Yamada M., et al. Rapid quantification of disease-marker proteins using continuous-flow immunoseparation in a nanosieve fluidic device. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81:7067-7074.
57. Wang Y.C., et al. Million-fold preconcentration of proteins and peptides by nanofluidic filter. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77:4293-4299.
58. Wang Y.C., Han J. Pre-binding dynamic range and sensitivity enhancement for immuno-sensors using nanofluidic preconcentrator. Lab Chip 2008, 8:392-394.
59. Fan A.C., et al. Nanofluidic proteomic assay for serial analysis of oncoprotein activation in clinical specimens. Nat. Med. 2009, 15:566-571.
60. Guihen E., Glennon J.D. Nanoparticles in separation science-recent developments. Anal. Lett. 2003, 36:3309-3336.
61. Zhang Z., et al. Applications of nanomaterials in liquid chromatography: opportunities for separation with high efficiency and selectivity. J. Sep. Sci. 2006, 29:1872-1878.
62. Old W.M., et al. Comparison of label-free methods for quantifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4:1487-1502.
63. Ito T., et al. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98:4569-4574.
64. Kocher T., et al. High precision quantitative proteomics using iTRAQ on an LTQ Orbitrap: a new mass spectrometric method combining the benefits of all. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8:4743-4752.
65. Yu X., et al. Carbon nanotube amplification strategies for highly sensitive immunodetection of cancer biomarkers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128:11199-11205.
66. Kong X.L., et al. High-affinity capture of proteins by diamond nanoparticles for mass spectrometric analysis. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77:259-265.
67. Li Y., et al. Immobilization of trypsin on superparamagnetic nanoparticles for rapid and effective proteolysis. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6:3849-3855.
68. Yao N., et al. Enrichment of peptides in serum by C(8)-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles for direct matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1185:93-101.
69. Kluchova K., et al. Superparamagnetic maghemite nanoparticles from solid-state synthesis - their functionalization towards peroral MRI contrast agent and magnetic carrier for trypsin immobilization. Biomaterials 2009, 30:2855-2863.
70. Lin S., et al. Novel microwave-assisted digestion by trypsin-immobilized magnetic nanoparticles for proteomic analysis. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7:1297-1307.
71. Qin W. Silica nanoparticles as pseudostationary phase for protein separation. Electrophoresis 2007, 28:3017-3023.
72. Luck M., et al. Analysis of plasma protein adsorption on polymeric nanoparticles with different surface characteristics. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1998, 39:478-485.
73. Gessner A., et al. Influence of surface charge density on protein adsorption on polymeric nanoparticles: analysis by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2002, 54:165-170.
74. Cedervall T., et al. Detailed identification of plasma proteins adsorbed on copolymer nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2007, 46:5754-5756.
75. 3-core removal for MALDI-TOF MS analysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2006, 45:3345-3349.
76. Lok C.N., et al. Proteomic analysis of the mode of antibacterial action of silver nanoparticles. J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5:916-924.
77. Cao Q., et al. Polymer monoliths with exchangeable chemistries: use of gold nanoparticles as intermediate ligands for capillary columns with varying surface functionalities. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82:7416-7421.
78. Lu Z., et al. Mesoporous TiO(2) nanocrystal clusters for selective enrichment of phosphopeptides. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82:7249-7258.
79. Zhou H., et al. Highly specific enrichment of phosphopeptides by zirconium dioxide nanoparticles for phosphoproteome analysis. Electrophoresis 2007, 28:2201-2215.
80. Lee I.S., et al. Ni/NiO core/shell nanoparticles for selective binding and magnetic separation of histidine-tagged proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128:10658-10659.