Trait-mediated trophic interactions: Is foraging theory keeping up?

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 119-125

  Railsback, Steven F ^a,b   Harvey, Bret C ^c  

^a HUMBOLDT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Lang Railsback and Associates   (United States)

^c PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; FITNESS; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; POPULATION STRUCTURE; RISK FACTOR; TRADE-OFF; TROPHIC INTERACTION;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOLOGY; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FOOD CHAIN; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; ECOLOGY; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FOOD CHAIN; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84872687797     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.023     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. MacArthur R.H., Pianka E.R. On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am. Nat. 1966, 100:603-609.
2. Emlen J.M. The role of time and energy in food preference. Am. Nat. 1966, 100:611-617.
3. Agrawal A.A., et al. Filling key gaps in population and community ecology. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2007, 5:145-152.
4. Beckerman A., et al. Adaptive foragers and community ecology: linking individuals to communities and ecosystems. Funct. Ecol. 2010, 24:1-6.
5. Werner E.E., Peacor S.D. A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 2003, 84:1083-1100.
6. Abrams P.A. Why predation rate should not be proportional to predator density. Ecology 1993, 74:726-733.
7. Preisser E.L., et al. Scared to death? The effect of intimidation and consumption in predator-prey interactions. Ecology 2005, 86:501-509.
8. Abrams P.A. Implications of flexible foraging for interspecific interactions: lessons from simple models. Funct. Ecol. 2010, 24:7-17.
9. Stouffer D.B. Scaling from individuals to networks in food webs. Funct. Ecol. 2010, 24:44-51.
10. Caro T. Behavior and conservation: a bridge too far?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22:394-400.
11. Schmitz O.J., et al. Trophic cascades: the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactions. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7:153-163.
12. Anholt B.R., Werner E.E. Interaction between food availability and predation mortality mediated by adaptive behavior. Ecology 1995, 76:2230-2234.
13. Bolnick D.I., Preisser E.L. Resource competition modifies the strength of trait-mediated predator-prey interactions: a meta-analysis. Ecology 2005, 86:2771-2779.
14. Resetarits W.J.J., et al. Threat of predation negates density effects in larval gray treefrogs. Oecologia 2004, 138:532-538.
15. Peacor S.D. Positive effects of predators on prey growth rate through induced modifications of prey behavior. Ecol. Lett. 2000, 5:77-85.
16. Macleod R., et al. Body mass change strategies in blackbirds Turdus merula: the starvation-predation risk trade-off. J. Anim. Ecol. 2005, 74:292-302.
17. Bednekoff P.A. Foraging in the face of danger. Foraging: Behavior and Ecology 2007, 305-330. University of Chicago Press. D.W. Stephens (Ed.).
18. Mangel M., Clark C.W. Toward a unified foraging theory. Ecology 1986, 67:1127-1138.
19. Clark C.W., Mangel M. Dynamic State Variable Models in Ecology 2000, Oxford University Press.
20. Houston A.I., McNamara J.M. Models of Adaptive Behaviour: An Approach Based on State 1999, Cambridge University Press.
21. Railsback S.F., et al. Tests of theory for diel variation in salmonid feeding activity and habitat use. Ecology 2005, 86:947-959.
22. Charnov E.L. Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1976, 9:129-136.
23. Luttbeg B., et al. Prey state and experimental design affect relative size of trait- and density-mediated indirect effects. Ecology 2003, 84:1140-1150.
24. Luttbeg B., Schmitz O.J. Predator and prey models with flexible individual behavior and imperfect information. Am. Nat. 2000, 155:669-683.
25. Railsback S.F., et al. Movement rules for spatially explicit individual-based models of stream fish. Ecol. Model. 1999, 123:73-89.
26. Railsback S.F., Harvey B.C. Analysis of habitat selection rules using an individual-based model. Ecology 2002, 83:1817-1830.
27. Schmitz O.J. Resolving Ecosystem Complexity 2010, Princeton University Press.
28. Stephens P.A., et al. Model complexity and population predictions. The alpine marmot as a case study. J. Anim. Ecol. 2002, 71:343-361.
29. Zhivotovsky L.A., et al. A model of individual adaptive behavior in a fluctuating environment. Adaptive Individuals in Evolving Populations 1996, 131-153. Addison-Wesley. R.K. Belew, M. Mitchell (Eds.).
30. Levin S.A. Fragile Dominion: Complexity and the Commons 1999, Helix Books.
31. Antonsson T., Gudjonsson S. Variability in timing and characteristics of Atlantic salmon smolt in Icelandic rivers. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 2002, 131:643-655.
32. Raby C.R., et al. Planning for the future by western scrub-jays. Nature 2007, 445:919-921.
33. Bergeron P., et al. Anticipation and tracking of pulsed resources drive population dynamics in eastern chipmunks. Ecology 2011, 92:2027-2034.
34. Valone T.J. Are animals capable of Bayesian updating? An empirical review. Oikos 2006, 112:252-259.
35. Grimm V., et al. Pattern-oriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: lessons from ecology. Science 2005, 310:987-991.
36. Grimm V., Railsback S.F. Individual-based Modeling and Ecology 2005, Princeton University Press.
37. Grimm V., Railsback S.F. Pattern-oriented modelling: a 'multiscope' for predictive systems ecology. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2012, 367:298-310.
38. Amano T., et al. Decision-making in group foragers with incomplete information: test of individual-based model in geese. Ecol. Monogr. 2006, 76:601-616.
39. Railsback S.F., Johnson M.D. Pattern-oriented modeling of bird foraging and pest control in coffee farms. Ecol. Model. 2011, 222:3305-3319.
40. Bolker B., et al. Connecting theoretical and empirical studies of trait-mediated interactions. Ecology 2003, 84:1101-1114.
41. Abrams P.A. Defining and measuring the impact of dynamic traits on interspecific interactions. Ecology 2007, 88:2555-2562.
42. Dieckmann U. Can adaptive dynamics invade?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1997, 12:128-131.
43. Brown J.S., et al. The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory and trophic interactions. J. Mammal. 1999, 80:385-399.
44. Alonzo S.H. State-dependent habitat selection games between predators and prey: the importance of behavioral interactions and expected lifetime reproductive success. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2002, 4:759-778.
45. Alonzo S.H., et al. Ecological games in space and time: the distribution and abundance of Antarctic krill and penguins. Ecology 2003, 84:1598-1607.
46. Satterthwaite W.H., Mangel M. Behavioral models as a common framework to predict impacts of environmental change on seabirds and fur seals. Deep-Sea Res. II 2012, 65-70:304-315.
47. Schmitz O.J. Combining field experiments and individual-based modeling to identify the dynamically relevant organizational scale in a field system. Oikos 2000, 89:471-484.
48. Schmitz O.J. From interesting details to dynamical relevance: toward more effective use of empirical insights in theory construction. Oikos 2001, 94:39-50.
49. Ovadia O., Schmitz O.J. Scaling from individuals to food webs: the role of size-dependent responses of prey to predation risk. Isr. J. Zool. 2004, 50:273-297.
50. Huse G., Giske J. Ecology in Mare Pentium: an individual based model for fish with adapted behavior. Fish. Res. 1998, 37:163-178.
51. Strand E., et al. Artificial evolution of life history and behavior. Am. Nat. 2002, 159:624-644.
52. Morales J.M., et al. Adaptive models for large herbivore movements in heterogeneous landscapes. Landscape Ecol. 2005, 20:301-316.
53. Giske J., et al. Explicit trade-off rules in proximate adaptive agents. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2003, 5:835-865.