Analysis of habitat-selection rules using an individual-based model

Ecology

Volumn 83, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 1817-1830

  Railsback, Steven F ^a   Harvey, Bret C ^b  

^a Railsback and Associates   (United States)

^b PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Foraging; Habitat selection; Individual based model; Model testing; Modeling; Movement motivation; Rules for habitat selection; Salmonidae; State based; Stream fish; Trout

Indexed keywords

FORAGING BEHAVIOR; HABITAT SELECTION; INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODEL; SALMONID; STREAM;

SALMONIDAE;

EID: 0037744558     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1817:aohsru]2.0.co;2     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Auyang, S. Y. 1998. Foundations of complex-system theories in economics, evolutionary biology, and statistical physics. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA.
2. Bart, J. 1995. Acceptance criteria for using individual-based models to make management decisions. Ecological Applications 5:411-420.
3. Bennett, A. T. D., and A. I. Houston. 1989. When to change habitat. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4:3-4.
4. Bowen, M. D. 1996. Habitat selection and movement of a stream-resident salmonid in a regulated river and tests of four bioenergetic optimization models. Dissertation. Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.
5. Brown, L. R., and P. B. Moyle. 1991. Changes in habitat and microhabitat partitioning within an assemblage of stream fishes in response to predation by Sacramento squawfish (Ptychocheilus grandis). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48:849-856.
6. Bugert, R. M., and T. C. Bjornn. 1991. Habitat use by steelhead and coho salmon and their responses to predators and cover in laboratory streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 120:486-493.
7. Bull, C. D., N. B. Metcalfe, and M. Mangel. 1996. Seasonal matching of foraging to anticipated energy requirements in anorexic juvenile salmon. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 263:13-18.
8. Campbell, E. A. 1998. Influence of streamflow and predators on habitat choice by trout. Dissertation. University of California, Davis, California, USA.
9. Everest, F. H., and D. W. Chapman. 1972. Habitat selection and spatial interaction by juvenile chinook salmon and steelhead trout in two Idaho streams. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 29:91-100.
10. Fausch, K. D. 1984. Profitable stream positions for salmonids: relating specific growth rate to net energy gain. Canadian Journal of Zoology 62:441-451.
11. Fausch, K. D., and R. J. White. 1986. Competition among juveniles of coho salmon, brook trout, and brown trout in a laboratory stream, and implications for Great Lakes tributaries. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 115:363-381.
12. Gatz, A. J. J., M. J. Sale, and J. M. Loar. 1987. Habitat shifts in rainbow trout: competitive influences of brown trout. Oecologia 74:7-19.
13. Gilliam, J. F., and D. F. Fraser. 1987. Habitat selection under predation hazard: test of a model with foraging minnows. Ecology 68:1856-1862.
14. Grimm, V. 1999. Ten years of individual-based modelling in ecology: What have we learned and what could we learn in the future? Ecological Modelling 115: 129-148.
15. Grimm, V., K. Frank, F. Jeltscb, R. Brandl, J. Uchmanski, and C. Wissel. 1996. Pattern-oriented modelling in population ecology. The Science of the Total Environment 183: 151-166.
16. Hanson, P., T. Johnson, J. Kitcbell, and D. E. Schindler. 1997. Fish bioenergetics [version] 3.0. University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute, Madison, Wisconsin. USA.
17. Harvey, B. C., R. J. Nakamoto, and J. L. White. 1999. The influence of large woody debris and a bankfull flood on movement of resident coastal cutthroat trout during fall and winter. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56:2161-2166.
18. Hill, J., and G. D. Grossman. 1993. An energetic model of microhabitat use for rainbow trout and rosyside dace. Ecology 74:685-698.
19. Hughes, N. F. 1992a. Selection of positions by drift-feeding salmonids in dominance hierarchies: model and test for arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus) in subarctic mountain streams, interior Alaska. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49:1999-2008.
20. Hughes, N. F. 1992b. Ranking of feeding positions by drift-feeding arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus) in dominance hierarchies. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49: 1994-1998.
21. Hughes, N. F. 1998. A model of habitat selection by drift-feeding stream salmonids at different scales. Ecology 79: 281-294.
22. Huston, M., D. DeAngelis, and W. Post. 1988. New computer models unify ecological theory. BioScience 38:682-691.
23. Jowett, I. G., and J. Richardson. 1994. Comparison of habitat use by fish in normal and flooded river conditions. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 28: 409-416.
24. Keith, R. M., T. C. Bjornn, W. R. Meehan, N. J. Hetrick, and M. A. Brusven. 1998. Response of juvenile salmonids to riparian and instream cover modifications in small streams flowing through second-growth forests of southeast Alaska. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 127:889-907.
25. Leonardsson, K. 1991. Predicting risk-taking behaviour from life-history theory using static optimization technique. Oikos 60: 149-154.
26. Lima, S. L., and L. M. Dill. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68:619-640.
27. Mangel, M. 1994. Life history variation and salmonid conservation. Conservation Biology 8:879-880.
28. Mangel, M., and C. W. Clark. 1986. Toward a unified foraging theory. Ecology 67:1127-1138.
29. Matheney, M. P., IV, and C. F. Rabeni. 1995. Patterns of movement and habitat use by northern hog suckers in an Ozark stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 124:886-897.
30. Metcalfe, N. B., and J. E. Thorpe. 1992. Anorexia and defended energy levels in over-wintering juvenile salmon. Journal of Animal Ecology 61:175-181.
31. Minar, N., R. Burkhart, C. Langton, and M. Askenazi. 1996. The Swarm simulation system: a toolkit for building multi-agent simulations. Working Paper 96-06-042. Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.
32. Moyle, P. B., and B. Vondracek. 1985. Persistence and structure of the fish assemblage in a small California stream. Ecology 66:1-13.
33. Nielsen, J. L. 1992. Microhabitat-specific foraging behavior, diet, and growth of juvenile coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 121:617-634.
34. Nislow, K. H., C. L. Folt, and D. L. Parrish. 1999. Favorable foraging locations for young Atlantic salmon: application to habitat and population restoration. Ecological Applications 9: 1085-1099.
35. Nislow, K., C. Folt, and M. Seandel. 1998. Food and foraging behavior in relation to microhabitat use and survival of age-0 Atlantic salmon. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:116-127.
36. Railsback, S. F. 2001. Getting "results": the pattern-oriented approach to analyzing natural systems with individual-based models. Natural Resource Modeling 14:465-474.
37. Railsback, S. F., R. H. Lamberson, B. C. Harvey, and W. E. Duffy. 1999. Movement rules for spatially explicit individual-based models of stream fish. Ecological Modelling 123:73-89.
38. Ross, S. T., and J. A. Baker. 1983. The response of fishes to periodic spring floods in a southeastern stream. American Midland Naturalist 109:1-14.
39. Roussel, J.-M., and A. Bardonnet. 1999. Ontogeny of diel pattern of stream-margin habitat use by emerging brown trout, Salmo trutta, in experimental channels: influence of food and predator presence. Environmental Biology of Fishes 56:253-262.
40. Strange, E. M., P. B. Moyle, and T. C. Foin. 1992. Interactions between stochastic and deterministic processes in stream fish community assembly. Environmental Biology of Fishes 36:1-15.
41. Tabor, R. A., and W. A. Wurtsbaugh. 1991. Predation risk and the importance of cover for juvenile rainbow trout in lentic systems. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 120:728-738.
42. Thorpe, J. E., M. Mangel, N. B. Metcalfe, and F. A. Huntingford. 1998. Modelling the proximate basis of salmonid life-history variation, with application to Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. Evolutionary Ecology 12:581-599.
43. Van Winkle, W., H. I. Jager, S. F. Railsback, B. D. Holcomb, T. K. Studley, and J. E. Baldrige. 1998. Individual-based model of sympatric populations of brown and rainbow trout for instream flow assessment: model description and calibration. Ecological Modelling 110:175-207.
44. Vondracek, B., and D. R. Longanecker. 1993. Habitat selection by rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss in a California stream: implications for the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 2:173-186.
45. Werner, E. E., and B. R. Anholt. 1993. Ecological consequences of the trade-off between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity. American Naturalist 142: 242-272.
46. Wilzbach, M. A. 1985. Relative roles of food abundance and cover in determining the habitat distribution of stream-dwelling cutthroat trout (Salmo clarki). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 42:1668-1672.