Defining and measuring the impact of dynamic traits on interspecific interactions

Ecology

Volumn 88, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 2555-2562

  Abrams, Peter A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Anti predator behavior; Density mediated indirect effect; Indirect interaction; Interaction strength; Nonconsumptive effect; Trait mediated interaction; Tri trophic system

Indexed keywords

ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; META-ANALYSIS; POPULATION DENSITY; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; TRITROPHIC INTERACTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; FOOD CHAIN; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEM; FOOD CHAIN; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 38449093938     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/06-1381.1     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Abrams, P. A. 1982. Functional responses of optimal foragers. American Naturalist 120:382-390.
2. Abrams, P. A. 1984. Foraging time optimization and interactions in food webs. American Naturalist 124:80-96.
3. Abrams, P. A. 1987. On classifying interactions between populations. Oecologia 73:272-281.
4. Abrams, P. A. 1989. The evolution of rates of successful and unsuccessful predation. Evolutionary Ecology 3:157-171.
5. Abrams, P. A. 1992. Predators that benefit prey and prey that harm predators: unusual effects of interacting foraging adaptations. American Naturalist 140:573-600.
6. Abrams, P. A. 1993a. Why predation rates should not be proportional to predator density. Ecology 74:726-733.
7. Abrams, P. A. 1993b. The interaction of mortality and energy costs in determining foraging behavior. Behavioral Ecology 4:246-253.
8. Abrams, P. A. 1995. Implications of dynamically variable traits for identifying, classifying, and measuring direct and indirect effects in ecological communities. American Naturalist 146:112-134.
9. Abrams, P. A. 1996. Dynamics and interactions in food webs with adaptive foragers. Pages 113-121 in G. Polis and K. Winemiller, editors. Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
10. Abrams, P. A. 1999. The adaptive dynamics of consumer choice. American Naturalist 153:83-97.
11. Abrams, P. A. 2001. Describing and quantifying interspecific interactions: a commentary on recent approaches. Oikos 94:209-218.
12. Abrams, P. A. 2004. Trait initiated indirect effects in simple food webs: consequences of changes in consumption-related traits. Ecology 85:1029-1038.
13. Abrams, P. A. 2005. The consequences of predator and prey adaptations for top-down and bottom-up effects. Pages 279-297 in P. Barbosa and I. Castellanos, editors. Ecology of predator-prey Interactions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
14. Abrams, P. A., and H. Matsuda. 1993. Effects of adaptive predatory and anti-predator behavior in a two prey-one predator system. Evolutionary Ecology 7:312-326.
15. Abrams, P. A., B. A. Menge, G. G. Mittelbach, D. Spiller, and P. Yodzis. 1996. The role of indirect effects in food webs. Pages 371-395 in G. Polis and K. O. Winemiller, editors. Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
16. Abrams, P. A., and M. Vos. 2003. Adaptation, density dependence, and the abundances of trophic levels. Evolutionary Ecology Research 5:1113-1132.
17. Bolker, B. M., M. Holyoak, V. Křivan, L. Rowe, and O. Schmitz. 2003. Connecting theoretical and empirical studies of trait-mediated interactions. Ecology 84:1101-1114.
18. Bolnick, D. I., and E. L. Preisser. 2005. Resource competition modifies the strength of trait-mediated predator-prey interactions: A meta-analysis. Ecology 86:2771-2779.
19. Fryxell, J. M., and P. Lundberg. 1998. Individual behavior and community dynamics. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
20. Griffin, C. A. M., and J. S. Thaler. 2006. Insect predators affect plant resistance via density- and trait-mediated indirect interactions. Ecology Letters 9:335-343.
21. Hugie, D. M., and L. M. Dill. 1994. Fish and game: a game theoretic approach to habitat selection by predators and prey. Journal of Fish Biology 45:151-169.
22. Křivan, V. 1996. Optimal foraging and predator-prey dynamics. Theoretical Population Biology 49:265-290.
23. Křivan, V. 1997. Dynamic ideal free distribution: effects of optimal patch choice on predator-prey dynamics. American Naturalist 149:164-178.
24. Křivan, V., and O. J. Schmitz. 2004. Trait and density mediated indirect interactions in simple food webs. Oikos 107:239-250.
25. Lima, S. L. 2002. Putting predators back into predator-prey interactions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:70-75.
26. Luttbeg, B., and J. L. Kerby. 2005. Are scared prey as good as dead? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20:416-418.
27. Luttbeg, B., L. Rowe, and M. Mangel. 2003. Prey state and experimental design affect relative size of trait-and density-mediated effects. Ecology 84:1140-1150.
28. Matsuda, H., M. Hori, and P. Abrams. 1994. Effects of predator-specific defense on community complexity. Evolutionary Ecology 8:628-638.
29. Matsuda, H., M. Hori, and P. Abrams. 1996. Effects of predator-specific defense on biodiversity and community complexity in two-trophic-level communities. Evolutionary Ecology 10:13-28.
30. Murdoch, W. W. 1969. Switching in general predators: experiments on prey specificity and stability of prey populations. Ecological Monographs 39:335-354.
31. Peacor, S. D. 2002. Positive effect of predators on prey growth rate through modifications of prey behaviour. Ecology Letters 5:77-85.
32. Peacor, S. D., and E. E. Werner. 1997. Trait mediated indirect interactions in a simple aquatic food web. Ecology 78:1146-1156.
33. Peacor, S. D., and E. E. Werner. 2000. Predator effects on an assemblage of consumers through induced changes in consumer foraging behavior. Ecology 81:1998-2010.
34. Peacor, S. D., and E. E. Werner. 2001. The contribution of trait-mediated indirect effects to the net effects of a predator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 98:3904-3908.
35. Preisser, E. L., D. I. Bolnick, and M. Benard. 2005. Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption on predator-prey interactions. Ecology 86:501-509.
36. Relyea, R. A. 2003. Predator cues and pesticides: a double dose of danger for amphibians. Ecological Applications 13:1515-1521.
37. Rosenzweig, M. L. 1974. On the evolution of habitat selection. Pages 401-404 in Proceedings of the First International Congress of Ecology. Center for Agricultural Publishing, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
38. Rosenzweig, M. L. 1981. A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 62:327-335.
39. Rosenzweig, M. L. 1991. Habitat selection and population interactions: a search for mechanism. American Naturalist 137(Supplement):S5-S28.
40. Sapolsky, R. M. 1998. Why zebras don't get ulcers. W. H. Freeman, New York, New York, USA.
41. Schmitz, O. J. 1998. Direct and indirect effects of predation and predation risk in old-field interaction webs. American Naturalist 151:327-342.
42. Schmitz, O. J., A. P. Beckerman, and K. M. O'Brien. 1997. Behaviorally mediated trophic cascades: effects of predation risk on food web interactions. Ecology 78:1388-1399.
43. Sih, A. 1984. The behavioral response race between predator and prey. American Naturalist 123:143-150.
44. Stephens, D. W., and J. R. Krebs. 1985. Foraging theory. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
45. Vermeij, G. J. 1982. Unsuccessful predation and evolution. American Naturalist 120:701-720.
46. Werner, E. E., and S. D. Peacor. 2003. A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84:1083-1100.
47. Werner, E. E., and S. D. Peacor. 2006. Lethal and nonlethal predator effects on an herbivore guild mediated by system productivity. Ecology 87:347-361.