The support of bone marrow stromal cell differentiation by airbrushed nanofiber scaffolds

Biomaterials

Volumn 34, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 2389-2398

  Tutak, Wojtek ^a   Sarkar, Sumona ^a   Lin Gibson, Sheng ^a   Farooque, Tanya M ^a   Jyotsnendu, Giri ^a   Wang, Dongbo ^a   Kohn, Joachim ^b   Bolikal, Durgadas ^b   Simon, Carl G ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Airbrushing; Bone marrow stromal cell; Cell differentiation; Electrospinning; Nanofiber; Stem cell

Indexed keywords

AIRBRUSHING; BONE MARROW STROMAL CELLS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; COMPRESSED GAS; ELECTROSPUN NANOFIBERS; ELECTROSPUNS; HUMAN BONE MARROW STROMAL CELLS; NANOFIBER MATS; NANOFIBER SCAFFOLD; NATIVE EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION; STEM CELL DIFFERENTIATION;

BONE; ELECTROSPINNING; MORPHOLOGY; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); STEM CELLS; TISSUE;

NANOFIBERS;

MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD; OSTEOCALCIN; POLYMER;

ARTICLE; BONE MARROW CELL; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSPINNING; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL; NANOFABRICATION; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STROMA CELL;

CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELLS, CULTURED; HUMANS; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOFIBERS; STEM CELLS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84872676457     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.12.020     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Abrams G.A., Goodman S.L., Nealey P.F., Franco M., Murphy C.J. Nanoscale topography of the basement membrane underlying the corneal epithelium of the rhesus macaque. Cell Tissue Res 2000, 299(1):39-46.
2. Li W.J., Laurencin C.T., Caterson E.J., Tuan R.S., Ko F.K. Electrospun nanofibrous structure: a novel scaffold for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res 2002, 60(4):613-621.
3. Jin G., Prabhakaran M.P., Ramakrishna S. Stem cell differentiation to epidermal lineages on electrospun nanofibrous substrates for skin tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2011, 7(8):3113-3122.
4. Elliott J.T., Tona A., Woodward J.T., Jones P.L., Plant A.L. Thin films of collagen affect smooth muscle cell morphology. Langmuir 2003, 19(5):1506-1514.
5. Li D., Xia Y. Electrospinning of nanofibers: reinventing the wheel?. Adv Mater 2004, 14(16):1151-1170.
6. Holzwarth J.M., Ma P.X. Biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2011, 32(36):9622-9629.
7. Formhals A. Process and apparatus for preparing artificial threads. US Patent No. 1975504; 1934.
8. Norton CL. Method of and apparatus for producing fibrous or filamentary material. US Patent No. 2048651; 1933.
9. Medeiros E.S., Glenn G.M., Klamczynski A.P., Orts W.J., Mattoso L.H. Solution blow spinning: a new method to produce micro- and nanofibers from polymer solutions. J Appl Polym Sci 2011, 113(4):2322-2330.
10. Srinivasan S., Chhatre S.S., Mabry J.M., Cohen R.E., McKinley G.H. Solution spraying of poly(methyl methacrylate) blends to fabricate microtextured, superoleophobic surfaces. Polymer 2011, 52(14):3209-3218.
11. Ertel S.I., Kohn J. Evaluation of a series of tyrosine-derived polycarbonates as degradable biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res 1994, 28(8):919-930.
12. Chatterjee K., Hung S., Kumar G.F., Simon C.G. Time-dependent effects of pre-aging 3D polymer scaffolds in cell culture medium on cell proliferation. J Funct Biomater 2012, 3(2):372-381.
13. Sharp D.G., Beard J.W. Size and density of polystyrene particles measure by ultracentrifugation. J Biol Chem 1950, 185(1):247-253.
14. Yang Y., Bolikal D., Becker M.L., Kohn J., Zeiger D.N., Simon C.G. Combinatorial polymer scaffold libraries for screening cell-biomaterial interactions in 3D. Adv Mater 2008, 20(11):2037-2043.
15. Simon C.G., Stephens J.S., Dorsey S.M., Becker M.L. Fabrication of combinatorial polymer scaffold libraries. Rev Sci Instrum 2007, 78(7):072207.
16. Dorsey S.M., Lin-Gibson S., Simon C.G. X-ray microcomputed tomography for the measurement of cell adhesion and proliferation in polymer scaffolds. Biomaterials 2009, 30(16):2967-2974.
17. Parekh S.H., Chatterjee K., Lin-Gibson S., Moore N.M., Cicerone M.T., Young M.F., et al. Modulus-driven differentiation of marrow stromal cells in 3D scaffolds that is independent of myosin-based cytoskeletal tension. Biomaterials 2011, 32(9):2256-2264.
18. Cordelires F., Jackson J. " 3D object counter" , ImageJ plugin 2006, http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/plugins/track/objects.html.
19. Uyar T., Havelund R., Hacaloglu J., Besenbacher F., Kingshott P. Functional electrospun polystyrene nanofibers incorporating α-, β-, and γ-cyclodextrins: comparison of molecular filter performance. ACS Nano 2010, 4(9):5121-5130.
20. Grafahrend D., Calvet J.L., Klinkhammer K., Salber J., Dalton P.D., Moller M., et al. Control of protein adsorption on functionalized electrospun fibers. Biotech Bioeng 2008, 101(3):609-621.
21. Kumar G., Tison C.K., Chatterjee K., Pine P.S., McDaniel J.H., Salit M.L., et al. The determination of stem cell fate by 3D scaffold structures through the control of cell shape. Biomaterials 2011, 32(35):9188-9196.
22. Dominici M., Le Blanc K., Mueller I., Slaper-Cortenbach I., Marini F., Krause D., et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The international society for cellular therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 2006, 8(4):315-317.
23. Robey P.G. Cell sources for bone regeneration: the good, the bad, and the ugly (but promising). Tissue Eng Pt B-Rev 2011, 17(6):423-430.
24. Smith L.A., Liu X., Hu J., Ma P.X. The influence of three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffolds on the osteogenic differentiation of embryonic stem cells. Biomaterials 2009, 30(13):2516-2522.
25. Smith L.A., Liu X., Hu J., Wang P., Ma P.X. Enhancing osteogenic differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells by nanofibers. Tissue Eng Pt A 2009, 15(7):1855-1864.
26. Ruckh T.T., Kumar K., Kipper M.J., Popat K.C. Osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells on poly(epsilon-caprolactone) nanofiber scaffolds. Acta Biomater 2010, 6(8):2949-2959.
27. Nguyen L.T., Liao S., Chan C.K., Ramakrishna S. Enhanced osteogenic differentiation with 3D electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds. Nanomedicine-UK 2012, 7(10):1561-1575.
28. Folkman J., Moscona A. Role of cell shape in growth control. Nature 1978, 273(5661):345-349.
29. Chen C.S., Mrksich M., Huang S., Whitesides G.M., Ingber D.E. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science 1997, 276(5317):1425-1428.
30. McBeath R., Pirone D.M., Nelson C.M., Bhadriraju K., Chen C.S. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 2004, 6(4):483-495.
31. Treiser M.D., Yang E.H., Gordonov S., Cohen D.M., Androulakis I.P., Kohn J., et al. Cytoskeleton-based forecasting of stem cell lineage fates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107(2):610-615.
32. Kumar G., Waters M.S., Farooque T.M., Young M.F., Simon C.G. Freeform fabricated scaffolds with roughened struts that enhance both stem cell proliferation and differentiation by controlling cell shape. Biomaterials 2012, 33(16):4022-4030.
33. Nam J., Johnson J., Lannutti J.J., Agarwal S. Modulation of embryonic mesenchymal progenitor cell differentiation via control over pure mechanical modulus in electrospun nanofibers. Acta Biomater 2011, 7(4):1516-1524.
34. Hong S., Kim G. Electrospun micro/nanofibrous conduits composed of poly(e-caprolactone) and small intestine submucosa powder for nerve tissue regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res B 2010, 94B(2):421-428.
35. Prabhakaran M.P., Venugopal J.R., Chyan T.T., Hai L.B., Chan C.K., Lim A.Y., et al. Electrospun biocomposite nanofibrous scaffolds for neural tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Pt A 2008, 14(11):1787-1797.
36. Li W.J., Cooper J.A., Mauck R.L., Tuan R.S. Fabrication and characterization of six electrospun poly(alpha-hydroxy ester)-based fibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater 2006, 2(4):377-385.
37. Zahedi P., Resaeian I., Ranaei-Siadat S.-O., Jafari S.-H., Supaphol P. A review on wound dressings with an emphasis on electrospun nanofibrous polymeric bandages. Polym Adv Technol 2010, 21(2):77-95.
38. Christopherson G.T., Song H., Mao H.Q. The influence of fiber diameter of electrospun substrates on neural stem cell differentiation and proliferation. Biomaterials 2009, 30(4):556-564.
39. Lowery J.L., Datta N., Rutledge G.C. Effect of fiber diameter, pore size and seeding method on growth of human dermal fibroblasts in electrospun poly(epsilon-caprolactone) fibrous mats. Biomaterials 2010, 31(3):491-504.
40. Li W.J., Danielson K.G., Alexander P.G., Tuan R.S. Biological response of chondrocytes cultured in three-dimensional nanofibrous poly(epsilon-caprolactone) scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003, 67A(4):1105-1114.
41. Baker B.M., Shah R.P., Silverstein A.M., Esterhai J.L., Burdick J.A., Mauck R.L. Sacrificial nanofibrous composites provide instruction without impediment and enable functional tissue formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109(35):14176-14181.
42. Friedman C.D., Costantino P.D., Takagi S., Chow L.C. BoneSource hydroxyapatite cement: a novel biomaterial for craniofacial skeletal tissue engineering and reconstruction. J Biomed Mater Res 1998, 43(4):428-432.