Modulus-driven differentiation of marrow stromal cells in 3D scaffolds that is independent of myosin-based cytoskeletal tension

Biomaterials

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 2256-2264

  Parekh, Sapun H ^a   Chatterjee, Kaushik ^a,b   Lin Gibson, Sheng ^a   Moore, Nicole M ^a   Cicerone, Marcus T ^a   Young, Marian F ^b   Simon, Carl G ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL AND CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone marrow stromal cell; Cytoskeleton; Hydrogels; Matrix modulus; Three dimensional culture

Indexed keywords

3D SCAFFOLDS; ACTIN FILAMENT; ASPARTATES; BONE MARROW STROMAL CELLS; CELL RESPONSE; CYTOSKELETAL; CYTOSKELETONS; ENCAPSULATED CELL; EXTRACELLULAR ENVIRONMENTS; HUMAN BONE MARROW STROMAL CELLS (HBMSC); IN-VIVO; INTEGRIN BINDING; INTEGRIN RECEPTORS; INTEGRINS; MARROW STROMAL CELL; MATRIX; MATRIX MODULUS; MECHANOSENSING; MICROTUBULES; MYOSIN II; OSTEOGENESIS; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION; POLY(ETHYLENE GLYCOL) HYDROGEL; PROTEIN LIGATION; THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D); THREE-DIMENSIONAL CULTURE;

AMINO ACIDS; BONE; ETHYLENE; ETHYLENE GLYCOL; HYDROGELS; PLANTS (BOTANY); POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYETHYLENE OXIDES; PRESSURE EFFECTS; PROTEINS; SCAFFOLDS; STIFFNESS MATRIX; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

CELL CULTURE;

INTEGRIN; INTEGRIN RECEPTOR; MACROGOL; MYOSIN; MYOSIN II; RHO KINASE; RHOA KINASE; SCAFFOLD PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE MARROW CELL; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL ENCAPSULATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL VIABILITY; CYTOSKELETON; DRUG BINDING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYDROGEL; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; MICROTUBULE; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; STROMA CELL; YOUNG MODULUS;

ADULT; ANIMALS; BONE MARROW CELLS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CYTOSKELETON; ELASTIC MODULUS; FEMALE; FIBRONECTINS; HUMANS; METHACRYLATES; MICE; MYOSINS; OLIGOPEPTIDES; OSTEOGENESIS; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; STROMAL CELLS; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 78751704335     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.11.065     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Barry F.P., Murphy J.M. Mesenchymal stem cells: clinical applications and biological characterization. Int J Biochem Cell B 2004, 36(4):568-584.
2. Engler A.J., Sen S., Sweeney H.L., Discher D.E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126(4):677-689.
3. Winer J.P., Janmey P.A., McCormick M.E., Funaki M. Bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells become quiescent on soft substrates but remain responsive to chemical or mechanical stimuli. Tissue Eng Part A 2009, 15(1):147-154.
4. Rowlands A.S., George P.A., Cooper-White J.J. Directing osteogenic and myogenic differentiation of MSCs: interplay of stiffness and adhesive ligand presentation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2008, 295(4):1037-1044.
5. Zhou J.A., Kim H.Y., Wang J.H.C., Davidson L.A. Macroscopic stiffening of embryonic tissues via microtubules, RhoGEF and the assembly of contractile bundles of actomyosin. Development 2010, 137(16):2785-2794.
6. Paszek M.J., Zahir N., Johnson K.R., Lakins J.N., Rozenberg G.I., Gefen A., et al. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell 2005, 8(3):241-254.
7. Ulrich T.A., Pardo E.M.D., Kumar S. The mechanical rigidity of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure, motility, and proliferation of glioma cells. Cancer Res 2009, 69(10):4167-4174.
8. Bianco P., Robey P.G., Simmons P.J. Mesenchymal stem cells: revisiting history, concepts, and assays. Cell Stem Cell 2008, 2(4):313-319.
9. Fu J.P., Wang Y.K., Yang M.T., Desai R.A., Yu X.A., Liu Z.J., et al. Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates. Nat Methods 2010, 7(9):733-736.
10. Petersen O.W., Ronnovjessen L., Howlett A.R., Bissell M.J. Interaction with basement-membrane serves to rapidly distinguish growth and differentiation pattern of normal and malignant human breast epithelial-cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992, 89(19):9064-9068.
11. Doyle A.D., Wang F.W., Matsumoto K., Yamada K.M. One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration. J Cell Biol 2009, 184(4):481-490.
12. Lammermann T., Bader B.L., Monkley S.J., Worbs T., Wedlich-Soldner R., Hirsch K., et al. Rapid leukocyte migration by integrin-independent flowing and squeezing. Nature 2008, 453(7191):51-55.
13. Peyton S.R., Kim P.D., Ghajar C.M., Seliktar D., Putnam A.J. The effects of matrix stiffness and RhoA on the phenotypic plasticity of smooth muscle cells in a 3-D biosynthetic hydrogel system. Biomaterials 2008, 29(17). 2597-07.
14. Cukierman E., Pankov R., Stevens D.R., Yamada K.M. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 2001, 294(5547):1708-1712.
15. Huebsch N., Arany P.R., Mao A.S., Shvartsman D., Ali O.A., Bencherif S.A., et al. Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate. Nat Mater 2010, 9:518-526.
16. Chatterjee K., Lin-Gibson S., Wallace W.E., Parekh S.H., Lee Y.J., Cicerone M.T., et al. The effect of 3D hydrogel scaffold modulus on osteoblast differentiation and mineralization revealed by combinatorial screening. Biomaterials 2010, 31(19):5051-5062.
17. Dominici M., Le Blanc K., Mueller I., Slaper-Cortenbach I., Marini F., Krause D., et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 2006, 8(4):315-317.
18. Block G.J., Ohkouchi S., Fung F., Frenkel J., Gregory C., Pochampally R., et al. Multipotent stromal cells are activated to reduce apoptosis in part by upregulation and secretion of stanniocalcin-1. Stem Cells 2009, 27(3):670-681.
19. Hauschka P.V., Frenkel J., Demuth R., Gundberg C.M. Presence of osteocalcin and related higher molecular-weight 4-carboxyglutamic acid-containing proteins in developing bone. J Biol Chem 1983, 258(1):176-182.
20. Lee Y.J., Parekh S.H., Kim Y.H., Cicerone M.T. Optimized continum from a photonic crystal fiber for broadband time-resolved coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering. Opt Express 2010, 18(5):4371-4379.
21. Liu Y., Lee Y.J., Cicerone M.T. Broadband CARS spectral phase retrieval using a time-domain Kramers-Kronig transform. Opt Lett 2009, 34(9):1363-1365.
22. Thibault M.M., Buschmann M.D. Migration of bone marrow stromal cells in 3D: 4 color methodology reveals spatially and temporally coordinated events. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 2006, 63(12):725-740.
23. Williams C.G., Malik A.N., Kim T.K., Manson P.N., Elisseeff J.H. Variable cytocompatibility of six cell lines with photoinitiators used for polymerizing hydrogels and cell encapsulation. Biomaterials 2005, 26(11):1211-1218.
24. Kloxin A.M., Kasko A.M., Salinas C.N., Anseth K.S. Photodegradable hydrogels for dynamic tuning of physical and chemical properties. Science 2009, 324(5923):59-63.
25. Sauer G.R., Zunic W.B., Durig J.R., Wuthier R.E. Fourier-transform Raman-spectroscopy of synthetic and biological calcium phosphates. Calcif Tissue Int 1994, 54(5):414-420.
26. Wozniak M.A., Chen C.S. Mechanotransduction in development: a growing role for contractility. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio 2009, 10(1):34-43.
27. Katsumi A., Orr A.W., Tzima E., Schwartz M.A. Integrins in mechanotransduction. J Biol Chem 2004, 279(13):12001-12004.
28. Hynes R.O. Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell 2002, 110(6):673-687.
29. Byron A., Humphries J.D., Askari J.A., Craig S.E., Mould A.P., Humphries M.J. Anti-integrin monoclonal antibodies. J Cell Sci 2009, 122(22):4009-4011.
30. Yeung T., Georges P.C., Flanagan L.A., Marg B., Ortiz M., Funaki M., et al. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. Cell Motil Cytoskel 2005, 60(1):24-34.
31. Discher D.E., Janmey P., Wang Y.L. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 2005, 310(5751):1139-1143.
32. Khatiwala C.B., Peyton S.R., Putnam A.J. Intrinsic mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix affect the behavior of pre-osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2006, 290(6):C1640-C1650.
33. McBeath R., Pirone D.M., Nelson C.M., Bhadriraju K., Chen C.S. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 2004, 6(4):483-495.
34. Ruiz S.A., Chen C.S. Emergence of patterned stem cell differentiation within multicellular structures. Stem Cells 2008, 26(11):2921-2927.
35. Sekiya I., Larson B.L., Vuoristo J.T., Cui J.G., Prockop D.J. Adipogenic differentiation of human adult stem cells from bone marrow stroma (MSCs). J Bone Miner Res 2004, 19(2):256-264.
36. Wall S.T., Yeh C.-C., Tu R.Y.K., Mann M.J., Healy K.E. Biomimetic matrices for myocardial stabilization and stem cell transplantation. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010, 95A(4):1055-1066.
37. Norvell S.M., Ponik S.M., Bowen D.K., Gerard R., Pavalko F.M. Fluid shear stress induction of COX-2 protein and prostaglandin release in cultured MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts does not require intact microfilaments or microtubules. J Appl Phys 2004, 96(3):957-966.
38. Homan S.M., Martinez R., Benware A., LaFlamme S.E. Regulation of the association of alpha 6 beta 4 with vimentin intermediate filaments in endothelial cells. Exp Cell Res 2002, 281(1):107-114.
39. Goldman R.D., Khuon S., Chou Y.H., Opal P., Steinert P.M. The function of intermediate filaments in cell shape and cytoskeletal integrity. J Cell Biol 1996, 134(4):971-983.
40. Pekny M., Lane E.B. Intermediate filaments and stress. Exp Cell Res 2007, 313(10):2244-2254.
41. Wang N., Tytell J.D., Ingber D.E. Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio 2009, 10(1):75-82.
42. Kelly D.J., Jacobs C.R. The role of mechanical signals in regulating chondrogenesis and osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells. Birth Defects Res C-Emb Tod-Rev 2010, 90(1):75-85.