The role of sound symbolism in language learning

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1152-1164

  Monaghan, Padraic ^a   Mattock, Karen ^a   Walker, Peter ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cross situational learning; Language acquisition; Language evolution; Sound symbolism; Word learning

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; SEMANTICS; SOUND; SYMBOLISM;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SEMANTICS; SOUND; SYMBOLISM; VERBAL LEARNING; VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84872675697     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0027747     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abelin, A. (1999). Studies in sound symbolism. Gothenburg, Sweden: Gothenburg University.
2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
3. Bergen, B. K. (2004). The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language, 80, 290-311. doi:10.1353/lan.2004.0056
4. Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
5. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2009). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer, Version 5.1.05 [Computer program]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org
6. Brown, R. (1958). Words and things. New York, NY: Free Press.
7. Bybee, J. (1985). Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.
8. Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 489-508. doi:10.1017/S0140525X08004998
9. Ciccotosto, N. (1991). Sound symbolism in natural language. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 53(2), 541.
10. Clark, A. (1998). Magic words: How language augments human computation. In P. Carruthers & J. Boucher (Eds.), Language and thought: Interdisciplinary themes (pp. 162-183). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11. Cutler, A. (1993). Phonological cues to openand closed-class words in the processing of spoken sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 109-131.
12. Davis, R. (1961). The fitness of names to drawings: A cross-cultural study in Tanganyika. British Journal of Psychology, 52, 259-268. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1961.tb00788.x
13. de Saussure, F. (1916). Course in general linguistics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
14. Farmer, T. A., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2006). Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103, 12203-12208. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602173103
15. Fischer-Jørgensen, E. (1978). On the universal character of phonetic symbolism with special reference to vowels. Studia Linguistica, 23, 80-90.
16. Gasser, M. (2004). The origins of arbitrariness of language. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 434-439). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Gasser, M., Sethuraman, N., & Hockema, S. (2010). Iconicity in expressives: An empirical investigation. In J. Newman & S. Rice (Eds.), Empirical and experimental methods in cognitive/functional research (pp. 163-180). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
18. Hinton, L., Nichols, J., & Ohala, J. (Eds.). (1994). Sound symbolism. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19. Hockett, C. F. (1960). The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203, 88-96. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88
20. Holland, M. K., & Wertheimer, M. (1964). Some physiognomic aspects of naming, or, maluma and takete revisited. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 19, 111-117. doi:10.2466/pms.1964.19.1.111
21. Horst, J. S., Scott, E. J., & Pollard, J. A. (2010). The role of competition in word learning via referent selection. Developmental Science, 13, 706-713. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00926.x
22. Imai, M., Kita, S., Nagumo, M., & Okada, H. (2008). Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition, 109, 54-65. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.015
23. Kantartzis, K., Kita, S., & Imai, M. (2009). Japanese sound-symbolism facilitates word learning in English-speaking children. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 591595). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Kelly, M. H. (1992). Using sound to solve syntactic problems: The role of phonology in grammatical category assignments. Psychological Review, 99, 349-364. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.2.349
25. Kita, S. (1997). Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics, 35, 379-416. doi:10.1515/ling.1997.35.2.379
26. Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology. New York, NY: Liveright.
27. Köhler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Liveright.
28. Kovic, V., Plunkett, K., & Westermann, G. (2010). The shape of words in the brain. Cognition, 114, 19-28. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.016
29. Maurer, D., Pathman, T., & Mondloch, C. J. (2006). The shape of boubas: Sound-shape correspondences in toddlers and adults. Developmental Science, 9, 316-322. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00495.x
30. Monaghan, P., Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2005). The differential role of phonological and distributional cues in grammatical categorization. Cognition, 96, 143-182. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.001
31. Monaghan, P., & Christiansen, M. H. (2008). Integration of multiple probabilistic cues in syntax acquisition. In H. Behrens (Ed.), Corpora in language acquisition research: History, methods, perspectives (pp. 139-164). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.
32. Monaghan, P., Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2007). The phonological distributional coherence hypothesis: Cross-linguistic evidence in language acquisition. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 259-305. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.12.001
33. Monaghan, P., Christiansen, M. H., & Fitneva, S. A. (2011). The arbitrariness of the sign: Learning advantages from the structure of the vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 325-347. doi:10.1037/a0022924
34. Monaghan, P., & Mattock, K. (2012). Integrating constraints for learning word-referent mappings. Cognition, 123, 133-143. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.12.010
35. Newman, S. (1933). Further experiments in phonetic symbolism. American Journal of Psychology, 45, 53-75. doi:10.2307/1414186
36. Newmeyer, F. J. (1993). Iconicity and generative grammar. Language, 68, 756-796. doi:10.2307/416852
37. Nielsen, A., & Rendall, D. (2011). The sound of round: Evaluating the sound-symbolic role of consonants in the classic takete-maluma phenomenon. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 115-124. doi:10.1037/a0022268
38. Nowak, M. A., & Krakauer, D. C. (1999). The evolution of language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 96, 8028-8033. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.14.8028
39. Nygaard, L. C., Cook, A. E., & Namy, L. L. (2009). Sound to meaning correspondences facilitate word learning. Cognition, 112, 181-186. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.04.001
40. Ohala, J. J. (1994). The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (pp. 325-347). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
41. Otis, K., & Sagi, E. (2008). Phonoaesthemes: A corpora-based analysis. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 65-70). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
42. Parault, S. J. (2006). Sound symbolic word learning in written context. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 228-252.
43. Paget, R. (1930). Human speech. New York, NY: Harcourt.
44. Parault, S. J., & Parkinson, M. (2008). Sound symbolic word learning in the middle grades. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 647671. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.07.003
45. Parault, S. J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2006). Sound-symbolism: A piece in the puzzle of word learning. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 329-351. doi:10.1007/s10936-006-9018-7
46. Plato. (1961). Cratylus (B. Jowett, Trans.). In E. Hamilton & H. Cairns (Eds.), The collected dialogues of Plato: Including the letters (pp. 421-474). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47. Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M. (2001). Synaesthesia: A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 3-34.
48. Rhodes, R. (1994). Aural images. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (pp. 276-292). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
49. Roget, P. M. (1991). Thesaurus. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org. (Original work published 1911)
50. Sapir, E. (1929). A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 225-239. doi:10.1037/h0070931
51. Shankar, M. U., Levitan, C. A., Prescott, J., & Spence, C. (2009). The influence of color and label information on flavor perception. Chemosensory Perception, 2, 53-58. doi:10.1007/s12078-009-9046-4
52. Smith, L., & Yu, C. (2008). Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situational statistics. Cognition, 106, 1558-1568. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.010
53. Spector, F., & Maurer, D. (2009). Synesthesia: A new approach to understanding the development of perception. Developmental Psychology, 45, 175-189. doi:10.1037/a0014171
54. Walker, P., Bremner, J. G., Mason, U., Spring, J., Mattock, K., Slater, A., & Johnson, S. (2010). Preverbal infants' sensitivity to synaesthetic cross-modality correspondences. Psychological Science, 21, 21-25. doi: 10.1177/0956797609354734
55. Wallis, J. (1699). Grammar of the English language (5th ed.). Oxford, England: Lichfield.
56. Wertheimer, M. (1958). The relation between the sound of a word and its meaning. American Journal of Psychology, 71, 412-415. doi:10.2307/1420089
57. Westbury, C. (2005). Implicit sound symbolism in lexical access: Evidence from an interference task. Brain and Language, 93, 10-19. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.07.006
58. Yu, C., & Ballard, D. H. (2007). A unified model of early word learning: Integrating statistical and social cues. Neurocomputing, 70, 2149-2165. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2006.01.034
59. Yu, C., & Smith, L. (2007). Rapid word learning under uncertainty via cross-situational statistics. Psychological Science, 18, 414-420. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01915.x