Biomechanical degradation of the nano-filled resin-modified glass-ionomer surface

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 315-320

  De Fúcio, Suzana Beatriz Portugal ^b   De Paula, Andréia Bolzan ^b   De Carvalho, Fabíola Galbiatti ^b   Feitosa, Victor Pinheiro ^b   Ambrosano, Glaucia Maria B ^c   Puppin Rontani, Regina Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b Dental Materials Program   (Brazil)

^c Department of Social and Public Health ^*  (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLASS;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

BIOMECHANICS; GLASS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84872579314     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. McLean JW, Wilson AD. The clinical development of the glass ionomer cements, I: Formulations and properties. Aust Dent J 1977;22:31-36. (Pubitemid 8086504)
2. Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Wang G. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2000; 16:129-138.
3. Ermis RB. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions. Quintessence Int 2002;33:542-548.
4. Frazier KB, Rueggeberg FA, Mettenburg DJ. Comparison of wearresistance of Class V restorative materials. J Esthet Dent 1998;10:309-314. (Pubitemid 128765430)
5. Croll TP, Bar-Zion Y, Segura A, Donly KJ. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth: A retrospective evaluation. JAm Dent Assoc 2001;132:1110-1116. (Pubitemid 33609935)
6. Mitra SB. Adhesion to dentin and physical properties of a lightcured glass ionomer. unerase. J Dent Res 1991;70:72-74.
7. Mclean JW. Dentinal bonding agents versus glass-ionomer cements. Quintessence Int 1996;27:659-667.
8. 3M Espe. Ketac N100 Light Curing Nano-Ionomer Restorative. http://multimedia.mmm.com/mws/mediawebserver.dyn76666660Zjcf61V s6EVs66SJMhCOrrrrQ
9. Oilo G. Biodegradation of dental composites/glass ionomer cements. Adv Dent Res 1992;6:50-54.
10. Heintze SD, Forjanic M. Sueface roughness of different dental materials before and after simulated tooth-brushing in vitro. Oper Dent 2005;30:617-626. (Pubitemid 41426517)
11. Fucio SBP, Carvalho FG, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MAC, PuppinRontani RM. The influence of 30-day-old Streptococcus mutans biofilm on the surface of esthetic restorative materials - An in vitro study. J Dent 2008;36:833-839.
12. Turssi CP, Hara AT, Serra MC, Rodrigues Jr AL. Effect of storage media upon the surface micromorphology of resin-based restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:864-871. (Pubitemid 41705095)
13. Shabanian M, Richards LC. In vitro wear rates of materials under different loads and varying pH. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:650-656. (Pubitemid 40433927)
14. Turssi CP, Hara AT, de Magalhães CS, Serra MC, Rodrigues AL Jr. Influence of storage regime prior to abrasion on surface topography of restorative materials. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2003;65:221-232
15. Correr GM, Alonso RCB, Sobrinho LC, Puppin-Rontani RM, Ferracane JL. In vitro wear of resin-based materials - Simultaneous corrosive and abrasive wear. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006;78:105-114.
16. Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics a7nd/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17 Suppl 2:68-81. (Pubitemid 44327699)
17. Dunkin RT, Chambers DW. Gingival response to class V composite resin restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1983;106:482-484.
18. Lu H, Roeder LB, Lei L, Powers JM. Effect of surface roughness on stain resistance of dental resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005;17:102-109.
19. Yap AU, Ng JJ, Yap SH, Teo CK. Surface finish of resin-modified and highly viscous glass ionomer cements produced by new one-step systems. Oper Dent 2004;29:87-91. (Pubitemid 38130905)
20. Hotta M, Hirukawa H, Aono M. The effect of glaze on restorative glassionomer cements. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:197-201.
21. Brosh T, Ferstand N, Cardash H, Baharav H. Effect of polymerization under pressure on indirect tensile mechanical properties of lightpolymerized composites. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:381-387. (Pubitemid 40433837)
22. Awliya WY. The influence of temperature on the efficacy of polymerization of composite resin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007;8:9-16.
23. Quance SC, Shortall AC, Harrington E, Lumley PJ. Effect of exposure intensity and post-cure temperature storage on hardness of contemporary photo-activated composites. J Dent 2001;29:553-560. (Pubitemid 33660603)
24. Auschill TM, Arweiler NB, Brecx M, Reich E, Sculean A, Netuschil L. The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110:48-53.
25. Eick S, Glockmann E, Brandi B, Pfister W. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to various restorative materials in a continuous flow system. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:278-285. (Pubitemid 38482357)
26. Hamada S, Slade HD. Biology, immunology and cariogenicity of Streptococcus mutans. Microbiol Rev 1980;44:331-384. (Pubitemid 11128312)
27. Smales RJ, Gao W. In vitro caries inhibition at the enamel margins of glass ionomer restoratives developed for the ART approach. J Dent 2000;28:249-256.
28. Sales D, Sae-Lee D, Matsuy S, Ana ID. Short-term fluoride and cations release from polyacid-modified composites in a distilled water, and an acidic lactate buffer. Biomaterials 2003;24:1687-1696. (Pubitemid 36187458)
29. Hengtrakool C, Pearson GJ, Wilson M. Interaction between GIC and S. sanguis biofilms: Antibacterial properties and changes of surface hardness. J Dent 2006;34:588-597. (Pubitemid 44216093)
30. Hotta M, Hirukawa H, Aono M. The effect of glaze on restorative glassionomer cements: Evaluation of environmental durability in lactic acid solution. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:685-689.
31. Cattani-Lorente M-A, Dupuis V, Payan J, Moya F, Meyer JM. Effect of water on the physical properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 1999;15:71-78. (Pubitemid 129591104)
32. Percq A, Dubois D, Nicholson JW. Water transport in resin-modified glass-ionomer dental cement. J Biomater Appl 2008;23:263-273.
33. Fano L, Fano V, Ma W, Wang X, Zhu F. Hydrolytic degradation and cracks in resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;69B:87-93. (Pubitemid 38392002)
34. Kanchanavasita W, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ. Water sorption characteristics of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Biomaterials 1997;18:343-349. (Pubitemid 27075106)
35. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Loher H, Handel G. Effect of variations from the recommended powder/liquid ratio on some properties of resin-modified cements. Acta Odontol Scand 2006;64:214-220. (Pubitemid 44049761)
36. Carlen A, Nikdel K, Wennerberg A, Holmberg K, Olsson J. Surface characteristics and in vitro biofilm formation on glass ionomer and composite resin. Biomaterials 2001;22:481-487. (Pubitemid 32007853)
37. Wang Y, Spencer P, Yao X, Ye Q. Effect of coinitiator and water on the photoreactivity and photopolymerization of HEMA/camphorquinonebased reactant mixtures. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;78:721-728. (Pubitemid 44300025)
38. Guo X, Wang Y, Spencer P, Ye Q, Yao X. Effects of water content and initiator composition on photopolymerization of a model BisGMA/ HEMA resin. Dent Mater 2008;24:824-831. (Pubitemid 351626165)
39. Mount GJ, Patel C, Makinson OF. Resin modified glass-ionomers: Strength, cure depth and translucency. Aust Dent J 2002;47:339-343.
40. http://multimedia.mmm.com/mws/mediawebserver.dyn76666660Zjcf61 Vs6EVs66S3IzC0rrrrQ-
41. da Cunha MR, Puppin-Rontani RM, Ferracane JL, Correr-Sobrinho L. In vitro wear evaluation of dental materials in primary teeth. Am J Dent 2006;19:364-369.
42. Yesil ZD, Alapati S, Johnston W, PhD, Seghi RR. Evaluation of the wear resistance of new nanocomposite resin restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:435-443.
43. Wang XY, Yap AU, Ngo HC, Chung SM. Environmental degradation of glass-ionomer cements: A depth-sensing microindentation study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007;82:1 -6.