Effect of variations from the recommended powder/liquid ratio on some properties of resin-modified cements

Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 214-220

  Behr, Michael ^a   Rosentritt, Martin ^a   Loher, Hans ^a   Handel, Gerhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Differential thermal analysis; Flexural modulus; Flexural strength; Powder liquid ratio; Resin modified glass ionomer; Wear

Indexed keywords

GLASS IONOMER; RESIN CEMENT;

ARTICLE; DEVICE; DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING CALORIMETRY;

DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DIFFERENTIAL THERMAL ANALYSIS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; MATERIALS TESTING; PLIABILITY; POWDERS; SOLUTIONS; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 33745925563     PISSN: 00016357     EISSN: 15023850     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016350600555859     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Chun Li Z, White SN. Mechanical properties of dental luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:597-609.
2. Irie M, Suzuki K. Current luting cements: marginal gap formation of composite inlay and their mechanical properties. Dent Mater 2001;17:347-53.
3. Kelly JR. Perspectives on strength. Dent Mater 1995;11: 103-10.
4. Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Wang G. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2000;16:129-38.
5. Prosser HJ, Powis DR, Wilson AD. Glass-ionomer cements of improved flexural strength. J Dent Res 1986;65:146-8.
6. Fleming GJ, Marquis PM, Shortall AC. The influence of clinically induced variability on the distribution of compressive fracture strength of a hand-mixed zinc phosphate dental cement. Dent Mater 1999;15:87-97.
7. Fleming GJ, Faroog AA, Barralet JE. Influence of powder/liquid mixing ratio on the performance of a restorative glass-ionomer dental cement. Biomaterials 2003;24:4173-9.
8. Mitsuhasi A, Hanaoka K, Teranaka T. Fracture toughness of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials: effect of powder/liquid ration and powder particle size reduction on fracture tough-ness. Dent Mater 2003;19:747-57.
9. Craig RG, Powers JM. Mechanical properties. Wear. In: Restorative dental materials, 11th edn. St. Louis: Mosby; 2002. p. 109-10.
10. Irie M, Suzuki K. Marginal seal of resin-modified glass ionomers and compomers: effect of delaying polishing procedure after one day storage. Oper Dent 2000;25:488-96.
11. Pelka M, Ebert J, Schneider C, Petschelt A. Comparison of two- and three-body wear of glass-ionomers and composites. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104:132-7.
12. De Gee AJ, Pallav P. Occlusal wear simulation with the ACTA wear machine. J Dent 1994;22(Suppl 1):S21-7.
13. Charsley EL, Warrinton SB. Thermal analysis-techniques and applications. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry; 1992.
14. Höhne G, Hemminger W, Flammersheim HJ. Differential scanning calorimetry. An introduction for practitioners. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1996.
15. Craig RG, Powers JM. Mechanical properties. Wear. In: Restorative dental materials, 11th edn. St. Louis: Mosby; 2002. p. 87-90.
16. Darvell BW. Materials science for dentistry. In: Darvell BW, Resin restorative materials, 7th edn. Hong Kong; 2002.
17. Spahl W, Budzikiewicz H, Geurtsen W. Determination of leachable components from four commercial dental composites by gas and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. J Dent 1998;26:137-45.
18. Reichl FX, Durner J, Hickel R, Spahl W, Kehe K, Walter U, et al. Uptake, clearance and metabolism of TEGDMA in guinea pigs. Dent Mater 2002;18:581-9.
19. Reichl FX, Durner J, Kehe K, Manhart J, Folwaczny M, Kleinsasser N, et al. Toxiokinetic of HEMA in guinea pigs. J Dent 2002;30:353-8.
20. Eckrote KA, Burstone CJ, Freilich MA, Messer GE, Goldberg AJ. Shear in flexure of fiber composites with different end supports. J Dent Res 2003;82:262-6.
21. De Gee AJ, Ten Harkel-Hagenaar HC, Davidson CL. Structural and physical factors affecting the tooth brush wear of dental composites. J Dent Res 1996;75:1613-9.
22. Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Heymann HO. Protection hypothesis for composite wear. Dent Mater 1992;8:305-9.