Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth: A retrospective evaluation

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 132, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 1110-1116

  Croll, Theodore P ^a,b,c,d   Bar Zion, Yael ^a   Segura, Adriana ^a   Donly, Kevin J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^d Georgetown Commons   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; VITREMER;

ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; CHEMISTRY; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INCISOR; INFANT; MALE; MOLAR TOOTH; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RECURRENT DISEASE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMPOSITE RESINS; CUSPID; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; INCISOR; INFANT; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MOLAR; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; RECURRENCE; RESIN CEMENTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0035434847     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0336     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Oral health in America: A report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, Md.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2000.
2. Black GV. Period of the temporary teeth. In: Black GV, ed. Operative dentistry: Treatment of caries. Vol. 3. Chicago: Medico-Dental; 1936:78-112.
3. Humphrey WP. Uses of chrome steel in children's dentistry. Dent Surv 1950;26:945-9.
4. Full CA, Walker JD, Pinkham JR. Stainless steel crowns for deciduous molars. JADA 1974;89:360-4.
5. Nelson GV, Osborne JW, Gale EN, Norman RD, Phillips RW. A three-year clinical evaluation of composite resin and a high copper amalgam in posterior primary teeth. ASDC J Dent Child 1980;47: 414-8.
6. Oldenburg TR, Vann WF Jr., Dilley DC. Composite restorations for primary molars: results after four years. Pediatr Dent 1987;9:136-43.
7. Tonn EM. Ryge G. Clinical evaluations of composite resin restora-tions in primary molars: a 4-year follow-up study. JADA 1988;117: 603-6.
8. Vann WF Jr., Barkmeier WW, Mahler DB. Assessing composite resin wear in primary molars: four-year findings. J Dent Res 1988;67 876-9.
9. Donly KJ, Wild T, Jensen ME. Cuspal reinforcement in primary teeth: an in vitro comparison of three restorative materials. Pediatr Dent 1988;10:102-4.
10. Morin D, deLong R. Douglas WH. Cusp reinforcement by the acid-etch technique. J Dent Res 1984;63:1075-8.
11. McLean JW, Wilson AD. The clinical development of the glass-ionomer cements, I: formulations and properties. Aust Dent J 1977; 22:31-6.
12. Diaz-Arnold AM, Holmes DC, Wistrom DW, Swift EJ. Short-term fluoride release/uptake of glass ionomer restoratives. Dent Mater 1995; 11:96-101.
13. Forsten L. Short- and long-term fluoride release from glass ionomers and other fluoride-containing filling materials in vitro. Scand J Dent Res 1990;98:179-85.
14. Hembree JH. Microleakage at the gingival margin of Class II composite restorations with glass-ionomer liner. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:28-30.
15. McInnes P, Perkins E, Weinberg R. Microleakage of glass ionomer/composite laminate Class V restorations. Am J Dent 1990; 3:21-4.
16. Olsen BT, Garcia-Godoy F, Marshall TD, Barnwell GM. Fluoride release from glass ionomer-lined amalgam restorations. Am J Dent 1989;2:89-91.
17. Mitra SB. Adhesion to dentin and physical properties of a light-cured glass ionomer liner/base. J Dent Res 1991;70:72-4.
18. Croll TP, Killian CM. Class I and Class II light-hardened glass ionomer/resin restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1993;4:908-18.
19. Croll TP, Killian CM. Glass-ionomer-resin restoration of primary molars with adjacent Class II carious lesions. Quintessence Int 1993; 24:723-7.
20. Croll TP, Helpin ML. Class II Vitremer restoration of primary molars. ASDC J Dent Child 1995;62:17-21.
21. Croll TP, Killian CM, Helpin ML. A restorative dentistry renais-sance for children: light-hardened glass ionomer/resin cement. ASDC J Dent Child 1993;60:89-94.
22. Donly KJ, Ingram C. An in vitro caries inhibition of photopolymerized glass ionomer liners. ASDC J Dent Child 1997;64:128-30.
23. Garcia-Godoy F, Jensen ME. Artificial recurrent caries in glass ionomer-lined amalgam restorations. Am J Dent 1990;3:89-93.
24. Griffin F, Donly KJ, Erickson R. Caries inhibition of three fluoride-releasing liners. Am J Dent 1992;5:293-5.
25. Hattab FN, Mok NY, Agnew EC. Artificially formed carieslike lesions around restorative materials. JADA 1989;118:193-7.
26. Hicks MJ, Flaitz CM, Silverstone LM. Secondary caries formation in vitro around glass ionomer restoration. Quintessence Int 1986;17: 527-32.
27. Jensen ME, Garcia-Godoy F, Wefel JS. Artificial root caries in amalgam restorations: effect of light-cured fluoride releasing liners. Am J Dent 1990;3:295-8.
28. Jensen ME, Wefel JS, Hammesfahr PD. Fluoride-releasing liners: in vitro recurrent caries. Gen Dent 1991;39:12-7.
29. Triolo PT, Wefel JS, Jensen ME. Fluoride-releasing core build-up materials and artificial caries. Am J Dent 1991;4:207-10.
30. Rabchinsky J, Donly KJ. A comparison of glass ionomer cement and calcium hydroxide liners in amalgam restorations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1993;13:378-83.
31. Souto M, Donly KJ. Caries inhibition of glass ionomers. Am J Dent 1994;7:122-4.
32. ten Cate JM, van Duinen RN. Hypermineralization of dental lesions adjacent to glass-ionomer cement restorations. J Dent Res 1995;74:1266-71.
33. Donly KJ, Segura A, Wefel JS, Hogan MM. Evaluating the effects of fluoride-releasing dental materials on adjacent interproximal caries. JADA 1999;130:817-25.
34. Donly KJ, Segura A, Kanellis M, Erickson RC. Clinical perfor-mance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. JADA 1999;130:1459-66.
35. McDonald RE, Avery DR. Restorative dentistry. In: McDonald RE, Avery DR, eds. Dentistry for the child and adolescent. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1994:399-427.
36. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980;30:347-58.
37. Mjör IA. Glass ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: a preliminary report. Quintessence Int 1996;27:171-4.
38. Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT. Longevity and cario-static effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results. J Dent Res 1997;76:1387-96.
39. Van Zeghbroeck L. Cements: theoretical considerations. In: Hunt PR, ed. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Glass Ionomers, Philadelphia, International Dental Symposia, PC; 1994: 217-26.
40. Uno S, Finger WJ, Fritz U. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater 1996;12:64-9.
41. Croll TP. Restorative dentistry for preschool children. In: Dental care for the preschool child: The dental clinics of North America. Johnsen DC, Tinanoff N, eds. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1995;39:737-70.
42. Nicholson JW, Croll TP. Glass-ionomer cements in restorative dentistry. Quintessence Int 1997;28:705-14.
43. Croll TP, Cavanaugh RR. Vitremer cement for Class I restoration of permanent teeth. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 1994;6:25-34.
44. Grandgenett C, Donly KJ, Croll TP. Filler particle percentage effects on compressive strength of a glass ionomer hybrid (abstract 411). J Dent Res 1996;75:69.
45. Quackenbush BM, Donly KJ, Croll TP. Powder/liquid ratio effects on caries inhibition of a light-cured glass-ionomer cement (abstract 645). J Dent Res 1997;76:94.
46. Quackenbush BM, Donly KJ, Croll TP. Solubility of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. ASDC J Dent Child 1998;65:310-12.
47. Croll TP. Preformed stainless steel crowns: an update. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;20:89-106.
48. Randall RC, Phil M, Vrijhoef MM, Wilson NH. Efficacy of pre-formed metal crowns vs. amalgam restorations in primary molars: a systematic review. JADA 2000;131:337-43.