In vitro wear evaluation of dental materials in primary teeth

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 364-369

  Da Cunha, Marcia Regina Bernardi ^a,b   Puppin Rontani, Regina Maria ^c   Ferracane, Jack L ^d   Correr Sobrinho, Lourenço ^a  

^a Federal University of Paraíba ^*

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARAÍBA   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^d OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOMER; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTITION; ENAMEL; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOLOGY; TOOTH DISEASE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTITION, PRIMARY; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH ATTRITION;

EID: 33846166723     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Roulet JF. Degradation of dental polymers. New York: Karger, 1987; 15-35.
2. Dahl BL, Carlsson GE, Ekfeldt A. Occlusal wear of teeth and restorative materials. Acta Odontol Scand 1993, 51: 299-311.
3. Mair LH, Stolarski TA, Vowles, RW, Lloyd CH. Wear: Mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. Report of a workshop. J Dent 1996; 24:141-148.
4. Söderholm KJ, Richards ND. Wear resistance of composites: A solved problem? Gen Dent 1998; 46:256-265.
5. Lutz, F, Phillips RW, Roulet JF, Setcos JC. In vivo and in vitro wear of potential posterior composites. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 914-920.
6. Seligman DA, Pullinger AG, Solberg WK. The prevalence of dental attrition and its association with factors of age, gender, occlusion, and TMJ symptomatology. J Dent Res 1988; 67: 1323-1333.
7. Madlena M, Keszilthelyi G, Alberth M, Nagy A. The attrition of deciduous teeth. Fogorv Sz 1989; 82: 273-276.
8. Nyström M. Development of horizontal tooth wear in maxillary anterior teeth from five to 18 years of age. J Dent Res 1990,69: 1765-1770.
9. Nanda RS, Khan J, Amand R. Age changes in the occlusal pattern of deciduous dentition. J Dent Res 1973; 52: 221-224.
10. Provenza DV. Fundamentals of oral histology and embriology. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1972; 107-119.
11. Mahoney E, Holt A, Swain M, Kilpatrick N. The hardness and modulus of elasticity of primary molar teeth: An ultra-micro-indentation study. J Dent 2000; 28: 589-594.
12. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Nixon WL. Occlusal forces in normal- and long-face children. J Dent Res 1983, 62: 571-574.
13. De Gee AJ, van Duinen RN, Werner A, Davidson CL. Early and long-term wear of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1613-1619.
14. Lambretchs P, Vanherle G, Vuylsteke M, Davidson CL. Quantitative evaluation of the wear resistance of posterior dental restorations: A new three-dimensional measuring technique. J Dent 1984; 12: 252-267.
15. Leinfelder KF. Posterior composite resins: The material and their clinical performance. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126: 663-676.
16. García-Godoy F. Resin-based composites and compomers in primary molars. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44: 541-570.
17. Peutzfeldt A, García-Godoy F, Asmussen E. Surface hardness and wear of glass ionomers and compomers. Am J Dent 1997; 10:15-17.
18. th ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 1998; 319-320 (In Portuguese).
19. nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001;109.
20. Cvar JF, Ryge G. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. US Government Printing Office, US Public Health Service 1971, Pub. No. 790-244.
21. Smith BGN, Knight JKK, An index for measuring the wear of the teeth. Br Dent J 1984; 156: 435-438.
22. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Evaluation of composite wear with a new multi-mode oral wear simulator. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 218-226.
23. Mazer RB, Leinfelder KF, Russell CM. Degradation of microfilled posterior composite. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 185-189.
24. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Clinical relevance of laboratory fatigue studies. J Dent 1994; 22: 97-102.
25. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1997, 76: 883-894.
26. Lugassy A, Greener EH. An abrasion resistance study of some dental resins. J Dent Res 1972; 51: 967-972.
27. Ehmford L, Derand T, Larsson LA, Svensson A. An abrasion test for composite resins. J Dent Res 1980; 59: 716-720.
28. Mckinney JE, Wu W. Relationship between subsurface damage and wear of dental restorative composites. J Dent Res 1982; 61: 1083-1088.
29. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Three-year follow-up of five posterior composites: In vivo wear. J Dent 1993; 21: 74-78.
30. Sunnegardh-Gronberg K, Peutzfeldt A, Van Dijken JW. Hardness and in vitro wear of a novel ceramic restorative cement Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110: 175-178.
31. Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Wang G. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 129-138.
32. Ogden AR. Porosity in composite resins. An Achilles heel? J Dent 1985; 13: 331-340.
33. Latta MA, Barkmeyer WW, Wilwerding TM, Balke SM. Localized wear of compomer restorative materials. Am J Dent 2001; 14: 238-240.
34. Jörgensen KD, Hørsted P, Janum O, Krogh J, Schultz J. Abrasion of class I restorative materials. Scand Dent Res 1979; 87: 140-145.
35. Jörgensen KD. Restorative resins: Abrasion vs. mechanical properties. Scand Dent Res 1980; 88: 557-568.
36. Lim BS, Ferracane JL, Condon JR, Adey JD. Effect of filler fraction and filler surface treatment on wear of microfilled composites. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 1-11.
37. Attin T, Vataschki M, Hellwig E. Properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quintessence Int 1996; 27; 203-209.
38. Hse KM, Wei SH. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128: 1088-1096.
39. Yap AU, Ong LF, Teoh SH, Hastings GW. Comparative wear ranking of dental restorative materials utilizing different wear simulation modes. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 574-580.
40. Frazier KB, Rueggeberg FA, Mettenburg DJ. Comparison of wear-resistance of Class V restorative materials. J Esthet Dent 1998; 10: 309-314.
41. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1405-1411.
42. Pilliar RM, Smith DC, Maric B. Oscillatory wear tests of dental composites. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 1166-1172.
43. Rice SL, Bailey WF, Wayne SF, Bums JA. Comparative in vitro sliding-wear study of conventional, microfilled, and light-cured composite restoratives. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 1173-1175.
44. Pallav P, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL, Erickson RL, Glasspoole EA. The influence of admixing microfiller to small-particle on composite resin on wear, tensile strength, hardness and surface roughness. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 489-490.
45. Yap AU. Occlusal contact area (OCA) wear of two new composite restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 194-200.
46. Leinfelder KF. Composite resins. Dent Clin North Am 1985; 29: 359-371.
47. De Gee AJ, Ten Harkel-Hagenaar HC, Davidson CL. Structural and physical factors affecting the brush wear of dental composites. J Dent 1985; 13: 60-70.
48. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF. Localized wear and marginal integrity of posterior resin composites. Am J Dent 1993; 6; 199-203.
49. Hu X, Shortall AC, Marquis, PM. Wear of three dental composites under different testing conditions. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 756-764.
50. Yap AU, Chew CL, Ong LF, Teoh SH. Environmental damage and occlusal contact area wear of composite restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 87-97.
51. Cobb DS, MacGregor KM, Vargas MA, Denehy GE. The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resin-based composites: A comparison. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131: 1610-1615.
52. Manhart J, Kunzelmann K-H, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 33-40.
53. Söderholm KJ, Lambretchs P, Sarrett D, Abe Y, Yang MC, Labella R, Yildiz E, Willems G. Clinical wear performance of eight experimental dental composites over three years determined by two measuring methods. Eur J Oral Sci 2001; 109: 273-281.
54. Krejci I, Albert P, Lutz F. The influences of antagonist standardization on wear. J Dent Res 1999; 78: 713-719.
55. Göhring TN, Besek MJ, Schmidlin PR. Attritional wear and abrasive surface alterations of composite resin materials in vitro. J Dent 2002; 30: 119-127.
56. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Chewing pressure vs. wear of composites and opposing enamel cusps. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 1525-1529.
57. Suzuki S, Suzuki SH, Cox CF. Evaluating the antagonist wear of restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127: 74-80.
58. Suzuki S, Nagai E, Taira Y, Minesaki Y. In vitro wear of indirect composite restoratives. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 431-436.
59. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Factors effecting dental composite wear in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 38: 303-313.
60. Shabanian M, Richards LC. In vitro wear rates of materials under different loads and varying pH. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 650-656.
61. Puppin-Rontani RM, de Goes MF, Voelske CE, García-Godoy F. Clinical perfomance and SEM evaluation of direct composite restorations in primary molars. Am J Dent 2006; 19:255-261.