The evolutionary origins of mating failures and multiple mating

Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata

Volumn 146, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 11-25

  Gowaty, Patricia Adair ^a,b,c   Hubbell, Stephen P ^a,b,c  

^a Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology   (United States)

^b SMITHSONIAN TROPICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Panama)

^c Polistes Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost of reproduction; Demographic stochasticity; Mating theory; Multiple inseminations; Sexual conflict; Switch point theorem

Indexed keywords

DEMOGRAPHIC SURVEY; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FITNESS; MARKOV CHAIN; MULTIPLE MATING; PARENTAL INVESTMENT; REPRODUCTIVE COST; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEXUAL CONFLICT; STOCHASTICITY; TRADE-OFF;

EID: 84872396892     PISSN: 00138703     EISSN: 15707458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/eea.12023     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Ah-King M & Gowaty PA (in press) Reaction norms of sex and adaptive individual flexibility in reproductive decisions. What's Left of Sexual Selection? Behavioural Ecology and Animal Aesthetics (ed. by T Hoquet ), Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
2. Anderson WW, Kim YK & Gowaty PA (2007) Experimental constraints on mate preferences in Drosophila pseudoobscura decrease offspring viability and fitness of mated pairs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 104: 4484-4488.
3. Arnold SJ (1994) Bateman principles and the measurement of sexual selection in plants and animals. American Naturalist 144: S126-S149.
4. Baer B & Schmid-Hempel P (1999) Experimental variation in polyandry affects parasite loads and fitness in a bumble-bee. Nature 397: 151-154.
5. Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2: 349-368.
6. Berglund A (1994) The operational sex ratio influences choosiness in a pipefish. Behavioral Ecology 5: 254-258.
7. Bluhm CK & Gowaty PA (2004) Social constraints on female mate preferences in mallards, Anas platyrhynchos, decrease offspring viability and mother productivity. Animal Behaviour 68: 977-983.
8. Bonachea LA & Ryan MJ (2010) Simulated predation risk influcences female choice in tungara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus. Ethology 117: 400-407.
9. Brennan BJ, Flaxman SM & Alonzo SH (2008) Female alternative reproductive behaviors: the effect of female group size on mate assessment and copying. Journal of Theoretical Biology 253: 561-569.
10. Burley NT & Foster VS (2006) Variation in female choice of mates: condition influences selectivity. Animal Behaviour 72: 713-719.
11. Calabrese JM & Fagan WF (2004) Lost in time, lonely, and single: reproductive asynchrony and the Allee effect. American Naturalist 164: 25-37.
12. Calabrese JM, Ries L, Matter SF, Debinski DM, Auckland JN et al. (2008) Reproductive asynchrony in natural butterfly populations and its consequences for female matelessness. Journal of Animal Ecology 77: 746-756.
13. Candolin U (1997) Predation risk affects courtship and attractiveness of competing threespine stickleback males. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 41: 81-87.
14. Clark L & Grant JWA (2010) Intrasexual competition and courtship in female and male Japanese medaka, Oryzias latipes: effects of operational sex ratio and density. Animal Behaviour 80: 707-712.
15. Clayton DH (1991) The influence of parasites on host sexual selection. Parasitology Today 7: 329-334.
16. Clutton-Brock TH (2007) Sexual selection in males and females. Science 318: 1882-1885.
17. Clutton-Brock TH (2009) Sexual selection in females. Animal Behaviour 77: 3-11.
18. Clutton-Brock TH & Parker GA (1992) Potential reproductive rate and the operation of sexual selection. Quarterly Review of Biology 67: 437-456.
19. Dale S, Kruszewicz A & Slagsvold T (1996) Effects of blood parasites on sexual and natural selection in the pied flycatcher. Journal of Zoology 238: 373-393.
20. Danchin E, Giraldeau LA, Valone TJ & Wagner RH (2004) Public information: from nosy neighbors to cultural evolution. Science 305: 487-491.
21. Darwin C (1871) The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray, London, UK.
22. Dewsbury DA (2005) The Darwin-Bateman paradigm in historical context. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45: 831-837.
23. Drickamer LC, Gowaty PA & Holmes CM (2000) Free female mate choice in house mice affects reproductive success and offspring viability and performance. Animal Behaviour 59: 371-378.
24. Dukas R (2005) Leaning affects mate choice in female fruit flies. Behavioral Ecology 16: 800-804.
25. Endler JA (1988) Sexual selection and predation risk in guppies. Nature 332: 593-594.
26. Fisher RA (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
27. Fisher HS & Rosenthal GG (2006) Hungry females show stronger mating preferences. Behavioral Ecology 17: 979-981.
28. Gowaty PA (1997) Sexual dialectics, sexual selection, and variation in mating behavior. Feminism and Evolutionary Biology (ed. by PA Gowaty ), pp. 351-384. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY, USA.
29. Gowaty PA (2006) Beyond extra-pair paternity: individual constraints, fitness components, and social mating systems. Essays on Animal Behavior: Celebrating 50 years of Animal Behaviour (ed. by J Lucas & L Simmons ), pp. 221-256. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
30. Gowaty PA (2012) The evolution of multiple mating: costs and benefits of polyandry to females and of polygyny to males. Fly 6: 1-9.
31. Gowaty PA & Hubbell SP (2005) Chance, time allocation, and the evolution of adaptively flexible sex role behavior. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45: 931-944.
32. Gowaty PA & Hubbell SP (2009) Reproductive decisions under ecological constraints: it's about time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106: 10017-10024.
33. Gowaty P & Hubbell SP (2010) Killing time: a mechanism of sexual selection and sexual conflict. Primary Sexual Characters in Animals (ed. by J Leonard & A Cordoba-Aguilar ), pp. 79-96. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
34. Gowaty PA, Steinichen R & Andersson WW (2002) Mutual interest between the sexes and reproductive success in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 56: 2537-2540.
35. Gowaty PA, Drickamer LC & Schmid-Holmes S (2003) Male house mice produce fewer offspring with lower viability and poorer performance when mated with females they do not prefer. Animal Behaviour 65: 95-103.
36. Gowaty PA, Anderson WW, Bluhm CK, Drickamer LC, Kim YK & Moore AJ (2007) The hypothesis of reproductive compensation and its assumptions about mate preferences and offspring viability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 104: 15023-15027.
37. Gowaty PA, Kim YK, Rawlings J & Andersson WW (2010) Polyandry increases offspring viability and mother productivity but does not decrease mother survival in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 107: 13771-13776.
38. Hamilton WD & Zuk M (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role of parasites. Science 218: 384-387.
39. Hamilton IM, Haesler MP & Taborsky M (2006) Predators, reproductive parasites, and the persistence of poor males on leks. Behavioral Ecology 17: 97-107.
40. Head ML, Lindholm AK & Brooks R (2008) Operational sex ratio and density do not affect directional selection on male sexual ornaments and behavior. Evolution 62: 135-144.
41. Heubel KU & Schlupp I (2008) Seasonal plasticity in male mating preferences in sailfin mollies. Behavioral Ecology 19: 1080-1086.
42. Hubbell SP & Johnson LK (1987) Environmental variance in lifetime mating success, mate choice, and sexual selection. American Naturalist 130: 91-112.
43. Hunt J, Brooks DR & Jennions MD (2005) Female mate choice as a condition-dependent life-history trait. American Naturalist 166: 79-92.
44. Jirotkul M (1999) Operational sex ratio influences female preference and male-male competition in guppies. Animal Behaviour 58: 287-294.
45. Johnson JB & Basolo AL (2003) Predator exposure alters female mate choice in the green swordtail. Behavioral Ecology 14: 619-625.
46. Kavaliers M, Colwell DD, Brown WJ & Choleris E (2003a) Brief exposure to the odour of a parasitized male alters the subsequent mate odour responses of female mice. Animal Behaviour 65: 59-68.
47. Kavaliers M, Colwell DD, Choleris E, Agmo A, Muglia LJ et al. (2003b) Impaired discrimination of and aversion to parasitized male odors by female oxytocin knockout mice. Genes Brain and Behavior 2: 220-230.
48. Kavaliers M, Fudge MA, Colwell DD & Choleris E (2003c) Aversive and avoidance responses of female mice to the odors of males infected with an ectoparasite and the effects of prior familiarity. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 54: 423-430.
49. Kim YK, Koepfer HR & Ehrman L (1996) Developmental isolation and subsequent adult behavior of Drosophila paulistorum III. Alternative rearing. Behavior Genetics 26: 27-37.
50. Kim TW, Christy JH & Choe JC (2007) A preference for a sexual signal keeps females safe. PLoS ONE 2: e422.
51. Kim TW, Christy JH, Dennenmoser S & Choe JC (2009) The strength of a female mate preference increases with predation risk. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 276: 775-780.
52. Klug H, Kontax CI, Annis S & Vasudevan N (2008) Operational sex ratio affects nest tending and aggression in male flagfish Jordanella floridae Goode & Bean. Journal of Fish Biology 72: 1295-1305.
53. Laland KN (2001) Imitation, social learning, and preparedness as mechanisms of bounded rationality. Bounded Rationality - The Adaptive Toolbox (ed. by GSR Gigerenzer & R Selten ), pp. 233-247. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
54. Lopez S (1999) Parasitized female guppies do not prefer showy males. Animal Behaviour 57: 1129-1134.
55. Magnhagen C (1990) Reproduction under predation risk in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus, and the black goby, Gobious niger: the effect of age and longevity. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 26: 331-335.
56. Magnhagen C (1991) Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 6: 183-185.
57. Magurran AE, Seghers BH, Carvalhob GR & Shaw PW (1993) Evolution of adaptive variation in antipredator behavior. Marine Behaviour and Physiology 23: 29-44.
58. Mazzi D (2004) Parasites make male pipefish careless. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17: 519-527.
59. Miller MN & Fincke OM (1999) Cues for mate recognition and the effect of prior experience on mate recognition in Enallagma damselflies. Journal of Insect Behavior 12: 801-814.
60. Miller GF & Todd PM (1998) Mate choice turns cognitive. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2: 190-198.
61. Nicoletto PF (1995) Offspring quality and female choice in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Animal Behaviour 49: 377-387.
62. Papaj DR & Prokopy RJ (1989) Ecological and evolutionary aspects of learning in phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 34: 315-350.
63. Parker PG & Tang-Martinez Z (2005) Bateman gradients in field and laboratory studies: a cautionary tale. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45: 895-902.
64. Parker GA, Baker RR & Smith VGF (1972) The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male-female phenomenon. Journal of Theoretical Biology 36: 529-553.
65. Platt J (1964) Strong inference. Science 146: 347-353.
66. Poulin R (1994) Mate choice decisions by parasitized female upland bullies, Gobiomorphus breviceps. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 256: 183-187.
67. Poulin R & Vickery WL (1996) Parasite mediated sexual selection: just how choosy are parasitized females? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 38: 43-49.
68. Reynolds JD & Gross MR (1992) Female mate preference enhances offspring growth and reproduction in a fish, Poecilia reticulata. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 250: 57-62.
69. Rhainds M (2010) Female mating failures in insects. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 136: 211-226.
70. Roitberg BD, Reid ML & Li C (1992) Choosing hosts and mates: the value of learning. Insect Learning: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives (ed. by DR Papaj & AC Lewis ), pp. 174-194. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY, USA.
71. Sih A & Krupa JJ (1992) Predation risk, food-depivation and nonrandom mating by size in the stream water strider, Aquarius remigis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 31: 51-56.
72. Simmons LW (1994) Courtship role reversal in bush crickets: another role for parasites. Behavioral Ecology 5: 259-266.
73. Smith EJ, Partridge JC, Parsons KN, White EM, Cuthill IC et al. (2002) Ultraviolet vision and mate choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behavioral Ecology 13: 11-19.
74. Tang-Martinez Z & Ryder TB (2005) The problem with paradigms: Bateman's worldview as a case study. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45: 821-830.
75. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man (ed. by B Campbell ), pp. 136-179. Aldine, Chicago, IL, USA.
76. White DJ (2004) Influences of social learning on mate-choice decisions. Learning & Behavior 32: 105-113.
77. Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.